Case law

Alabama Flake Graphite Co. v. United States

125 Ct. Cl. 635 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1953

This is shown, among other things, by Shumate’s letter to Wierum of the War Production Board after his visit to Washington. … Article V of tile RFC Resolution of February 20, 1942, authorizing plaintiffs’ loan, provided in part as follows : (3) CONSTRUCTION.

T.J.D. Services, Inc. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,871 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 11, 1984

Palmer & Sicard, Inc. v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 420, 422 (1984); Conoc Constr. Corp. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 146, 148 (1983); Metric Constr. Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, supra, and Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United States, supra.

Arthur

513 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1975

After opening the record for whatever additional evidence the parties wished to present, the Board of Appeals and Beview upheld the previous determination that plaintiff’s separation was not an involuntary separation for … See Esgate v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 207 (1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 913 (1969). “it is therefore ordered that plaintiff’s petition be and the same is hereby dismissed.”

Caiyod v. Department of the Navy

231 Ct. Cl. 1004 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 17, 1982

The Merit Systems Protection Board ( mspb) held that he was not so entitled because his service for the United States did not amount to the necessary years of nonexcepted or nonexcluded service. … Menchavez v. Office of Personnel Management, ante at 924; Valenzuela v. Office of Personnel Management, ante at 907; Castro v. Office of Personnel Management, ante at 867; Cubacub v.

Indiana Retail Hardware Ass'n v. United States

366 F.2d 998 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

As we said in Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. … Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States, supra, at 691, 320 F. 2d at 380.

H. L. Yoh Co. v. United States

153 Ct. Cl. 104 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961

In Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States, 138 Ct. … In other cases, Ruff v. United States, 96 Ct. Cl. 148 (1942); Virginia Engineering Co ., Inc., v. United States, 101 Ct. Cl. 516 (1944); Loftis v. United States, 110 Ct.

Absher v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 223 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1985

Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166 , 101 S.Ct. 453 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980). … Railroad Retirment Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. at 179 , 101 S.Ct. at 461 .

Jones

578 F.2d 1391 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1978

not appear before a retiring board upon his release from active duty. … Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 17-19 , 310 F.2d 381, 391-92 (1962), cert. denied sub nom. Lipp v. *730 United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963).

Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United States

324 F.2d 516 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1963

For example, the Supreme Court, in United States v. Callahan Walker Const. … McGraw and Co. v. United States, 130 F.Supp. 394 , 131 Ct.Cl. 501 (1955), and Oliver-Finnie Co. v.

Murdaugh Stuart Madden and Clifford J. Hynning v. The United States

371 F.2d 469 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1967

Co. v. United States, 97 F.Supp. 829, 831 , 119 Ct.Cl. 749, 766 (1951), and Seaboard Surety Co. v. … Madden, on June 14, docketed an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. The board scheduled a hearing for November 15, 1960. Meanwhile, although SBA continued to work with Mr.

Black Star Security, Inc. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,431 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1984

Mosely Co., Inc. v. … In Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v.

Prindle v. United States

41 Ct. Cl. 8 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1905

In the case of the United States v. Thomas ( 195 U. S., 421 ) Mr. … Justice Brown, in commenting upon the purposes of this proviso, uses this language: “ Shore duty beyond seas being an exceptional duty, both to officers of the Army and Navy, and being probably attended by increased expenditures

Community Services, Incorporated v. The United States

422 F.2d 1353 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

For instance, the Tax Court in South Penn Oil Co. v. … The Board determined that there were many times when such words were not necessary. See Colton v. Colton, 127 U.S. 300 , 8 S.Ct. 1164 , 32 L.Ed. 138 (1888).

Biddle

175 Ct. Cl. 895 · United States Court of Claims · May 2, 1966

. § 1552 authorizing the establishment of Correction Boards to correct military records, citing as authority for its position, Betty Friedman, et al. v. United States, 159 Ct. … Friedman v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 239 , 158 F. Supp. 364 (1958), is inapposite since the claim in that case was founded on disability retirement statutes.

Twin Disc, Inc. v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 713 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 27, 1986

Browne. … Perry Brown. (Brown Tr. W.-2120-21).

Pettit v. United States

488 F.2d 1026 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1973

The Board rejected his appeal as untimely. … He did not ask the Board to waive the time limit and did not and does not at the present time contend that the Board abused its discretion by not extending the time limit for his appeal. *228 Plaintiff says it would have

Bean v. United States

175 F. Supp. 166 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1959

They have no right to additional compensation for this period under the decisions of this court in Gaetke, et al. v. United States, 136 C. Cls. 756 , and Sawyer, et al. v. United States, 138 C. … Armstrong v. United States, 144 C. Cls. 659 , cert. denied 361 U.S. 825 .

Alexander v. United States

37 Ct. Cl. 33 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1901

Antoine Fuette, and a prize crew was put on board, but on the following da}*- the master succeeded in overpowering the prize crew and recaptured the vessel and took her into the island and port of Tortola, one of the Virgin … (Vattel’s Law of Nations, Book III, 339 et seq.; Barker v. Blakes, 9 East Rep., 283; 1 Chitty’s Commercial Law, 482-489; The Ship Maria, 1 C. Rob. Rep., 340 ; The Ship Mentor, 1 Edwards’s Rep., 208.)

Rawlins v. United States

646 F.2d 459 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1980

He was considered again by the administrative board of Nov.-Dee., 1945, but was not selected by that board. … by the above described panels and boards.

Commercial Metals Co. v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 343 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966

The abbreviation “f.o.b.” means “free on board.” Stalik v. United States, 247 F. 2d 136, 138 (10th Cir., 1957). … Sheridan-Kirk Contract Co. v. United States, 52 Ct. Cl. 407, 413 (1917) ; Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. United States, 109 Ct. Cl. 390, 418 (1947) ; Breese Burners, Inc. v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 649, 659 , 121 F.