Case law

Samuel Jacobowitz v. The United States

424 F.2d 555 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

Both parties appealed to the Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission. … Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254, 261 (1962); Williams v.

Dillon

566 F.2d 1190 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1977

The clinic’s physician then recommended consideration of plaintiffs case by a board of medical officers and the board ultimately recommended discharge due to an erroneous enlistment. This was effected. … See, e.g., Abbott v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 384, 388-89 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1024 (1973).

McRitchie v. United States

23 Ct. Cl. 23 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1887

The rules and discipline for a man-of-war were always enforced, and the officers and crew dressed in Navy uniform, and always messed and slept on board. … The service rendered at Norfolk, under the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in United States v. Symonds ( 120 U. S. R., 50 ), should also be considered sea service.

Alfred Hofmann and Company v. The United States

329 F.2d 657 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 13, 1964

Plaintiff cites Fruit Growers Express Co. v. … No Government contract shall contain a provision making final on a question of law the decision of any administrative official, representative, or board.” 5 . United Foundation Corporation v.

Libby v. United States

81 F. Supp. 722 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 3, 1949

The Commanding Officer at Morrison Field transmitted the Board’s Report to the War Department with the statement that he did not concur in the findings or recommendations of the Board, and on July 20,1944, a Board of Officers … The defendant argues that the facts in the case of Stevens v. United States, 41 C. Cls. 344 , are apposite to the facts in the case at bar.

Cornell v. District of Columbia

20 Ct. Cl. 229 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 23, 1885

By act of Congress approved June 20,1874, the Board of Public Works was abolished, and a Board of Audit, consisting of the First and Second Comptrollers of the United States, created, authorized to audit the floating indebtedness … The rule applicable to the case is stated by the Supreme Court in Cromwell v. The County of Sac ( 96 U. S.

Dravo Corp. v. United States

480 F.2d 1331 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1973

Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals (The Board) on May 27,1969. In a decision, Eng. … We hold that the plaintiff is right, and the Board in error.

Guss v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 380 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1925

Gardner v. Michigan, Central R. R. Co., 150 U. S. 349 ; Manh attan Life Ins. Co. v. Broughton, 109 U. S. 121 ; Oscanyan v. Arms Co., 103 U. S. 261 ; Jacobs v. Marks, 182 U. S. 583 ; Haldeman v. United States, 91 U. … S. 584 ; Hughes v. United States, 4 Wall. 232 ; Homer v. Brown, 16 How. 355 ; Spicer v. United States, 5 C. Cls. 34 ; Book v. United States, 31 C. Cls. 272 . The motion of the defendant is overruled.

Haehn Management Co. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,469 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1988

It is true that the board in Lybum remarked that the “relatively new material” had proved itself on other projects when manufactured, tested, stored, and applied properly, see id. at 22,190, but the board made the same observation … Moore v. United States, 196 U.S. 157, 166 , 25 S.Ct. 202, 203-04 , 49 L.Ed. 428 (1905); Northwestern Indus. Piping, Inc. v. United States, 199 Ct.Cl. 540, 550-51 , 467 F.2d 1308, 1314 (1972); W.G. Cornell Co. v.

American Manufacturing Co.

215 Ct. Cl. 1037 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1978

V 1975). … Co. v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 185, 194 , 518 F.2d 1202, 1207 (1975). "it is therefore ordered that the relief demanded in defendant’s request for review is denied without prejudice.

Paragon Energy Corp. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,989 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 27, 1981

Marden Corp. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 799, 805 , 442 F. 2d 364, 367 (1971); Len Co. & Associates v. United States, 181 Ct. … See Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 757 , 345 F. 2d 833 (1965); Shedd, Disputes and Appeals: The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 29 Law & Contemp.

Ottinger v. United States

157 Ct. Cl. 12 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1962

Ottinger Brothers v. United States, 123 Ct. Cl. 23 (1952). … H* «í» H* V 51.

SCM Corp. v. United States

595 F.2d 595 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1979

Plaintiff appealed the final decision of the contracting officer to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) on November 14, 1972, which docketed the case as No. 17936. … See United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 (1969).

Harrison v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 122 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1885

In Edwards’s Lessee v. … R., 87 ); and Brown’s Case ( 18 C. Cls. R., 537 ), affirmed by the Supreme Court ( 113 U. S., 568 ).

Empire Ordnance Corp. v. United States

108 F. Supp. 622 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

The rule as to necessary or indispensable parties was stated in Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank Co., 215 U. … The counterclaim alleges that the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board determined that these companies were indebted to the United States.

Andrew Radel Oyster Co. v. United States

78 Ct. Cl. 816 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1934

See Gibson v. United States, 166 U.S. 269 . … This case falls within the doctrine laid down in United States v. North American Co., 253 U.S. 330 , and is to be distinguished from the power of eminent domain as was pointed out in Phelps v.

Chavez v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 212 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1988

British American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 89 Ct.Cl. 438, 441 (1939). In this case, the election of legal theory dictated the election of forum. Brown v. … Brown v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 343 , 358 F.2d 1002 (1966) (if plaintiff’s action is dismissed from the district court proceeding without *217 addressing the merits jurisdiction may lie in this court).

Barron v. United States

231 Ct. Cl. 854 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 23, 1982

For the reasons set out below, we uphold the decision of the board. … . § 7703 (c); Moss v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 837 (1982); Brewer v. U.S. Postal Service, 227 Ct. Cl. 276 , 647 F.2d 1093 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1144 (1982); Wathen v. United States, 208 Ct.

Ackley v. United States

40 Ct. Cl. 216 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1905

and the sea pay of his grade from June 5 to September 8,1899, under the following state of facts: March 17, 1899, the claimant was, by order of the Secretary of the Navy, detached from duty as secretary of the Light-House Board … In the case of United States v.

John P. Monahan v. The United States

354 F.2d 306 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

See Zirin v. McGinnes, 282 F.2d 113 (C.A.3, 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. *308 921, 81 S.Ct. 286 , 5 L.Ed.2d 260 . … Begendorf v. United States, 340 F.2d 362 , 169 Ct.Cl. 293 (January 1965).