Case law

Indiana Retail Hardware Ass'n v. United States

366 F.2d 998 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

As we said in Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. … Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States, supra, at 691, 320 F. 2d at 380.

Ciambelli v. United States

198 Ct. Cl. 240 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

Plaintiff appealed to the Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission which affirmed the decision. … In Jacobowitz v. United States, 191 Ct.

Absher v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 223 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1985

Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166 , 101 S.Ct. 453 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980). … Railroad Retirment Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. at 179 , 101 S.Ct. at 461 .

Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United States

324 F.2d 516 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1963

For example, the Supreme Court, in United States v. Callahan Walker Const. … McGraw and Co. v. United States, 130 F.Supp. 394 , 131 Ct.Cl. 501 (1955), and Oliver-Finnie Co. v.

North Star Chemical Works v. United States

71 Ct. Cl. 342 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1930

In October, 1918, the War Industries Board fixed the price of wool grease at 16 cents per pound. … American Rolling Mill Co. v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 882 . The cases cited by the plaintiff, Barrett Company v. United States, 273 U. S. 227 ; Peninsular Stove Co. v. United States, 58 C.

Caiyod v. Department of the Navy

231 Ct. Cl. 1004 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 17, 1982

The Merit Systems Protection Board ( mspb) held that he was not so entitled because his service for the United States did not amount to the necessary years of nonexcepted or nonexcluded service. … Menchavez v. Office of Personnel Management, ante at 924; Valenzuela v. Office of Personnel Management, ante at 907; Castro v. Office of Personnel Management, ante at 867; Cubacub v.

Andrew Radel Oyster Co. v. United States

78 Ct. Cl. 816 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1934

See Gibson v. United States, 166 U.S. 269 . … This case falls within the doctrine laid down in United States v. North American Co., 253 U.S. 330 , and is to be distinguished from the power of eminent domain as was pointed out in Phelps v.

Giles. v. Office of Personnel Management

229 Ct. Cl. 615 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 20, 1981

This civilian pay case comes before the court on petitioner’s appeal from final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. … Roskos v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 34, 40 , 549 F.2d 1386, 1389 (1977).

Arthur

513 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1975

After opening the record for whatever additional evidence the parties wished to present, the Board of Appeals and Beview upheld the previous determination that plaintiff’s separation was not an involuntary separation for … See Esgate v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 207 (1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 913 (1969). “it is therefore ordered that plaintiff’s petition be and the same is hereby dismissed.”

Langford v. United States

12 Ct. Cl. 338 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1876

The title thus assured to the American Board was what is known in our public-land law as a “statutory title.” … In the case of Gaines v. Nicholson, (9 How. R., 356,) one party claimed in like manner under a statutory grant, and the other under a subsequent Indian treaty.

U.S. Shelter Corp. v. United States

13 Cl. Ct. 606 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1987

Publishing Co. v. … V.

Eaton Corp. v. United States

591 F.2d 682 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1979

Plaintiff completed Article V of the proposed Special Terms and Conditions as indicated by the underscoring shown in the following quotation of the article: PRICES A. … Co. v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 274, 285 , 510 F.2d 1379, 1385 (1975).

Universal Coatings/Won Ill Co. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,173 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 19, 1991

United States v. Grumman *244 Aerospace Corp., 927 F.2d 575, 579 (Fed. Cir.1991); Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. v. United States, 878 F.2d 1426, 1428-29 (Fed.Cir.1989). … Ball, Ball & Brosamer, supra, 878 F.2d at 1428 ; KDH Corp. v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 34, 41 (1991); Cox Construction Co. v. United States, 21 Cl. Ct. 98, 103 (1990); Triax Co. v.

Grad Partnership v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,051 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1984

Dale Ingram, Inc. v. *361 United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 56 , 475 F.2d 1177 (1973); Project Map, Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 52 , 486 F.2d 1375 (1973); Fraass Surgical Mfg. Co. v. … Federal Corp. v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 212 (1983).

John P. Monahan v. The United States

354 F.2d 306 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

See Zirin v. McGinnes, 282 F.2d 113 (C.A.3, 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. *308 921, 81 S.Ct. 286 , 5 L.Ed.2d 260 . … Begendorf v. United States, 340 F.2d 362 , 169 Ct.Cl. 293 (January 1965).

Estate of Ridgely v. United States

180 Ct. Cl. 1220 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

as a site for. a new school — which site the Board rejected. … See e.g., Helvering v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 95 F. 2d 806 (4th Cir. 1938); Commissioner v. Shattuck, 97 F. 2d 790 (7th Cir. 1938); Helvering v. Kimberly, 97 F. 2d 433 (4th Cir. 1938); Phipps v.

Ackley v. United States

40 Ct. Cl. 216 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1905

and the sea pay of his grade from June 5 to September 8,1899, under the following state of facts: March 17, 1899, the claimant was, by order of the Secretary of the Navy, detached from duty as secretary of the Light-House Board … In the case of United States v.

Lincoln National Life Insurance v. United States

582 F.2d 579 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1978

See generally Brady v. United States, 397 U. S. 742, 748 (1970); Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 444 (1966). … V.

Cherry Hill Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 357 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1985

In a case analogous to this one, the Board of Contract Appeals was faced with ascertaining a reasonable interpretation of a contract. In J.A. Jones Constr. … See Johnson v. RAC Corp., 491 F.2d 510, 515 (4th Cir.1974); Washington v. Cameron, 411 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C.Cir.1969). See also Aviation Specialities, Inc. v.

Cornell v. District of Columbia

20 Ct. Cl. 229 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 23, 1885

By act of Congress approved June 20,1874, the Board of Public Works was abolished, and a Board of Audit, consisting of the First and Second Comptrollers of the United States, created, authorized to audit the floating indebtedness … The rule applicable to the case is stated by the Supreme Court in Cromwell v. The County of Sac ( 96 U. S.