Case law

Pratt-Mallory Co. v. United States

12 F. Supp. 1020 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1936

Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 .

Allied Kid Co. v. United States

145 F. Supp. 633 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

circumstances and conditions existing in the Manila Port Terminal Area at the time pertinent to plaintiff’s claim are set out fully in the court’s findings of fact, and are also discussed in Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation v. … The evidence is not clear as to just what the military personnel said after they boarded the vessel.

Morrow v. United States

156 Ct. Cl. 493 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1962

The Correction Board requested an opinion of the Surgeon General who replied: The finding of the physical evaluation board, 2 November 1954, Valley Forge Army Hospital, that Lt. Colonel James D. … [Italic supplied] This court, in the case of Remaley v. United States, 129 Ct.

Vemo Co. v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,095 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 27, 1985

Co. v. … Co. v. United States, supra, 228 Ct.Cl. at 563 , 661 F.2d at 167 .

Greene v. United States

94 F. Supp. 666 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1951

This can only be done by an immigration inspector, or, in certain cases, by a Board of Special Inquiry. … This we do not think is at variance with what we said in O'Rourke v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 33, 40 , et seq., iandl Taylor v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 59, 63 , et seq.

Foreign Trade Management Co. v. United States

74 F. Supp. 550 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1947

Swiss Confederation v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 388 ; cert. denied, 332 U. S. 815 ; United States v. New River Collieries, 262 U. S. 341 . We must, then, determine, if we can, the export price of this commodity. … . - It suffices to say that the Board of Economic Warfare thought these prices were too high, and would not grant export licenses for sales at such prices.

Robinson v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 130 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1984

Fucik v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 379, 382 , 655 F.2d 1089, 1093 (1981); Brewer v. … Alers v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 560, 570 , 633 F.2d 559, 564 (1980); Giles v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 602, 609 , 553 F.2d 647, 650-51 (1977); Power v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 126, 130 , 531 F.2d 505, 507 (1976).

Pedone v. United States

151 F. Supp. 288 · United States Court of Claims · May 8, 1957

On or about November 25, 1952, the partners entered into a stipulation with the Wage Stabilization Board with respect to the excessive' wage payments. … See Supreme Court discussion in Lilly v. Commissioner, 343 U.S. 90 , 72 S.Ct. 497 , 96 L.Ed. 769 .

Cape Fox Corp. v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 223 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 27, 1983

The modification was thought to reduce the contract sale to 28.5 million board feet; subsequent calculations revealed that the volume of the sale was approximately 27.7 million board feet. … A total of about 4 million additional board feet had been cut and bucked and about 3 million board feet was then in rafts.

Cowen v. United States

149 Ct. Cl. 598 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1960

Green v. Baughman, 243 F. 2d 610 . He did appeal, and as stated previously before final determination his case was reviewed five different times on both the merits and procedures. … No military officers were assigned to membership on the Board. *613 29.

Brozo v. United States

156 Ct. Cl. 476 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1962

Bienvenu v. United States, supra. … Plaintiff relies on Leonard v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 91; Fredrickson v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 890 ; and Williams v. United States, 145 Ct.

Oak Worsted Mills v. United States

36 F.2d 529 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1929

For the reasons above stated, we concur in the view taken upon this question by the Board of Tax Appeals and by the Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Florsheim Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. … A.) 22 F.(2d) 367 ; Campbell v. Holt, 115 U. S. 620 , 6 S. Ct. 209 , 29 L. Ed. 483 ; Railroad Co. v. Alabama, 101 U. S. 832 , 25 L. Ed. 973 ; Beers v. Arkansas, 20 How. 527 , 15 L. Ed. 991 ; West Side Co. v.

Hurst

546 F.2d 432 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1976

See Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 (1976), and King v. United States, 395 U.S. 1 (1968). “it is thereeore ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition is granted.”

Stith v. Office of Personnel Management

231 Ct. Cl. 827 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1982

This civilian pay case comes before us on respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to appeal the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (board) within 30 days of its decision, as required by Rule 172(a) and 5 U.S.C … The petition was thus clearly out of time (180 days after the board decision) and so beyond our jurisdiction. Coleman v. Department of the Army, 227 Ct.Cl. 536 (1981).

Lawrenson v. United States

153 F. Supp. 790 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1957

We quote from a decision in the case of Rafferty v. … The Court, following the rule in Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U. S. 74, 79 , 58 S. Ct. 98, 100 , 82 L. Ed. 57 , sustained the reduction.

Ferraro

650 F.2d 288 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1980

According to plaintiff he did not ask for or have a physical evaluation board at the time of his retirement. He was, however, examined by the Veterans Administration in 1966, 1969 and 1974. … See, e.g., Jordan v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 65, 72-73 (1974).

Hoffman Construction Co. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,664 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1981

The General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (Board) rejected plaintiffs claim and plaintiff here appeals. … Space Corp. v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 1, 6 , 470 F.2d 536, 539 (1972). Plaintiff here cannot argue that the discrepancy was so subtle as to be unrecognizable.

Solitron Devices, Inc.

215 Ct. Cl. 1080 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 24, 1978

In October 1974, these records had ceased to be of interest to the Internal Revenue Service or the Renegotiation Board. The Board’s unilateral orders were issued on January 24, 1975. … Steamship Co. v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 312 , 459 F.2d 1393 (1972).

Warren G. Schaller v. United States

288 F.2d 700 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

Flanagan v. Young, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 119 , 228 F.2d 466 . … Crocker v. United States, 127 F.Supp. 568 , 130 Ct.Cl. 567 .

Nealon

175 Ct. Cl. 894 · United States Court of Claims · May 2, 1966

arbitrary, and that since plaintiff has *895 failed to allege arbitrary denial of bis application by tbe board, be lias failed to make out a case. … for the Correction of Military Keeords and on the basis of Bowman v.