Case law

Nealon

175 Ct. Cl. 894 · United States Court of Claims · May 2, 1966

arbitrary, and that since plaintiff has *895 failed to allege arbitrary denial of bis application by tbe board, be lias failed to make out a case. … for the Correction of Military Keeords and on the basis of Bowman v.

Mott v. United States

9 Ct. Cl. 257 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1873

And in the case of Morgan v. … And in Morgan’s case there was a pilot on board, as there was here.

Laningham v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 146 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1984

See Interstate Circuit v. United States, 306 U.S. 208, 221 , 59 S.Ct. 467, 472 , 83 L.Ed. 610 (1939); California-Pacific Utilities v. United States, 194 Ct.Cl. 703, 718 (1971); United States v. … Browning Debentures Holding Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1086 (2d Cir.1977).

Shaller

546 F.2d 430 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1976

The CSC Board of Appeals and Review reaffirmed that finding. … Cl. 352 (1976); Gratehouse v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 288 , 512 F. 2d 1104 (1975); Antera v. United States, 182 Ct.

Dunstan Abel v. The United States

423 F.2d 339 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

Brownell v. Tom We Shung, 352 U.S. 180, 184-185 , 77 S.Ct. 252 , 1 L.Ed.2d 225 (1956); Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48, 51 , 75 S.Ct. 591 , 99 L.Ed. 868 (1955); Heikkila v. … Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114, 121-125 , 66 S. *345 Ct. 423, 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, supra; Brownell v. Tom We Shung, supra; Wellman v.

Pratt-Mallory Co. v. United States

12 F. Supp. 1020 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1936

Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 .

Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co. v. United States

41 F.2d 870 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1930

In Yon Baumback. v. … The Chevrolet Motor Company v. United States, 64 Ct.

Ciambelli v. United States

198 Ct. Cl. 240 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

Plaintiff appealed to the Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission which affirmed the decision. … In Jacobowitz v. United States, 191 Ct.

Robinson v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 130 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1984

Fucik v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 379, 382 , 655 F.2d 1089, 1093 (1981); Brewer v. … Alers v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 560, 570 , 633 F.2d 559, 564 (1980); Giles v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 602, 609 , 553 F.2d 647, 650-51 (1977); Power v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 126, 130 , 531 F.2d 505, 507 (1976).

Morrow v. United States

156 Ct. Cl. 493 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1962

The Correction Board requested an opinion of the Surgeon General who replied: The finding of the physical evaluation board, 2 November 1954, Valley Forge Army Hospital, that Lt. Colonel James D. … [Italic supplied] This court, in the case of Remaley v. United States, 129 Ct.

Tinsley v. United States Air Force

229 Ct. Cl. 705 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1981

A cause of action for military disability pay or compensation accrues as soon as the proper military board has acted or declined to act. Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. … Cl. 1 , 310 F.2d 381 (1962), cert. denied sub nom., Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963).

Eastman Kodak Co. v. United States

48 F. Supp. 357 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1943

United States v. 200 Barrels of Whiskey, 95 U.S. 571 , 24 L.Ed. 491 ; Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 342 , 40 S.Ct. 155 , 64 L.Ed. 297 ; Campbell v. … United States v. Harrison Johnston, 124 U.S. 236 , 8 S.Ct. 446 , 31 L.Ed. 389 ; Brown v. United States, 113 U.S. 568 , 5 S.Ct. 648 , 28 L.Ed. 1079 ; United States v.

Walker v. United States

179 Ct. Cl. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1967

On April 8, 1964, the Civil Service Commission’s Board of Appeals and Beview affirmed this decision. It denied reconsideration of the decision. Plaintiff then filed suit for back pay in this court on July 1, 1965. … United States v. Wickersham, 201 U.S. 390, 399, 400 (1906); Armand v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 339 (1956); Corrigan v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 392 (1961); Alpert v. United States, 161 Ct.

Spaulding

154 Ct. Cl. 866 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1961

Upon consideration of defendant’s motion and on the basis of this court’s decision in Brown v. United States, 150 Ct.

Giles. v. Office of Personnel Management

229 Ct. Cl. 615 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 20, 1981

This civilian pay case comes before the court on petitioner’s appeal from final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. … Roskos v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 34, 40 , 549 F.2d 1386, 1389 (1977).

Hurst

546 F.2d 432 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1976

See Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 (1976), and King v. United States, 395 U.S. 1 (1968). “it is thereeore ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition is granted.”

ISCO, Inc.

506 F.2d 1407 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1974

. § 742 ; Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 472 , 130 F. Supp. 336 (1955) and Johnson v. U.S. … Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 280 U.S. 320 (1930)] and on the basis of 28 U.S.C. § 1506 (1970), “it is ordered that defendant’s said motion for summary judgment of dismissal is denied and this case is transferred

Adkins v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 715 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1981

The filing of an application with the correction board did not toll the statute of limitations as this was a permissive, not a mandatory remedy. Bruno v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 383 , 556 F.2d 1104 (1977). … Montilla v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 48 , 457 F.2d 978 (1972); Parker v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 661 , 461 F.2d 806 (1972). There is no triable issue here.

Whitecliff, Inc. v. United States

536 F.2d 347 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1976

An amendment of 1972 established a Provider Reimbursement Review Board with jurisdiction to review reimbursement disputes where the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000. … of the Board’s decision by the Secretary.

Clemmer Const. Co. v. United States

71 F. Supp. 917 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1947

The Government invokes the ruling of the Supreme Court in Horowitz v. United States, 267 U.S. 458 , 45 S.Ct. 344 , 69 L.Ed. 736 , and the decisions of this court in the early cases of Deming v. … United States, 1 Ct.Cl. 190 , and Jones v. United States, 1 Ct. Cl. 383 , to the effect that no action lay for such conduct of the Government. It also cites our recent decisions in Gothwaite v.