Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
2.34s
312 F.2d 785 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1963
See Parkway Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C.Mem.Dec., March 16, 1959; Brown v. Commissioner, 215 F.2d 697, 699-701 (C.A.5, 1954) ; Lewis v. Commissioner, 253 F.2d 821, 827-28 (C.A.2, 1958); Wilson v. … See also Brown v. Commissioner, supra. In Ruoff v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedHorace Heidt Foundation v. United States
170 F. Supp. 634 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959
and that the three organizers should constitute the first board of directors. … Sico Co. v. United States, 102 F.Supp. 197 , 121 Ct.Cl. 373 ; Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden, 263 U.S. 578 , 44 S.Ct. 204 , 68 L.Ed. 458 ; C. F. Mueller Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 190 F.2d 120 ; Roche’s Beach, Inc., v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedAmerican Optical Corp. v. United States
592 F.2d 1149 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1979
The facts stated in Section I were found by the Board or are otherwise properly derived from undisputed evidence in the administrative record. See Truong Xuan True v. United States, 212 Ct. … Porter v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 355, 366 , 496 F.2d 583, 590 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 (1975); AMCO Electric v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 24, 31 , 493 F.2d 647, 650 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublished546 F.2d 430 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1976
The CSC Board of Appeals and Review reaffirmed that finding. … Cl. 352 (1976); Gratehouse v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 288 , 512 F. 2d 1104 (1975); Antera v. United States, 182 Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished506 F.2d 1407 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1974
. § 742 ; Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 472 , 130 F. Supp. 336 (1955) and Johnson v. U.S. … Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 280 U.S. 320 (1930)] and on the basis of 28 U.S.C. § 1506 (1970), “it is ordered that defendant’s said motion for summary judgment of dismissal is denied and this case is transferred
Cited 1 timesPublished390 F.2d 915 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1968
Such a problem is basically one of fact to be decided on the particular circumstances of the case, Browne v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 523 , 356 F. 2d 546 (1966), and no one circumstance or factor is controlling. … See, e.g., Brown v. Comm'r, 143 F. 2d 468, 470 (5th Cir. 1944); Ehrman v. Comm'r, 120 F. 2d 607, 610 (9th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 668 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedSwiss Confederation v. United States
70 F. Supp. 235 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1947
Plaintiff filed claim therefor with the Board of Economic Warfare. … United States v. New River Collieries Co., 262 U.S. 341 , 43 S.Ct. 565 , 67 L.Ed. 1014 ; United States v. Miller et al., 317 U.S. 369 , 63 S.Ct. 276 , 87 L.Ed. 336 , 147 A.L.R. 55 ; United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTinsley v. United States Air Force
229 Ct. Cl. 705 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1981
A cause of action for military disability pay or compensation accrues as soon as the proper military board has acted or declined to act. Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. … Cl. 1 , 310 F.2d 381 (1962), cert. denied sub nom., Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963).
Cited 0 timesPublished228 Ct. Cl. 715 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1981
The filing of an application with the correction board did not toll the statute of limitations as this was a permissive, not a mandatory remedy. Bruno v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 383 , 556 F.2d 1104 (1977). … Montilla v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 48 , 457 F.2d 978 (1972); Parker v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 661 , 461 F.2d 806 (1972). There is no triable issue here.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Health & Medical Organization, Inc. v. United States
641 F.2d 870 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1981
Texas v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 522 , 537 F.2d 466 (1976). 42 U.S.C. §§ 1855 -55g (1964) (current version at 42 U.S.C. §§ 4401 et seq. (1970)). City of Manassas Park v. United States, 224 Ct. … Florentino v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 545 , 607 F.2d 963 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1083 (1980). For discussion on judicial review of administrative decisions see Julius Goldman’s Egg City v.
Cited 19 timesPublished151 Ct. Cl. 205 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 2, 1960
Crocker v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 567 ; Knotts v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 489 ; Stringer v. United States, 117 Ct. Cl. 30 . … Crocker v. United States, supra; McGuire v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 17 ; Harris v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 15 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedE. H. Sales, Inc. v. The United States
340 F.2d 358 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965
United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Co., 317 U.S. 56 , 63 S.Ct. 113 , 87 L. Ed. 49 (1942). … Co. v. United States, 337 F.2d 861 , 162 Ct.Cl. -, decided July 12, 1963; H. R. Henderson & Co., Inc. v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 319-60, this day decided.
Cited 13 timesPublished169 Ct. Cl. 619 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1965
Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 (1959). … Allen v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 598 (1961) ; Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 (1959) ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 (1956).
Cited 19 timesPublishedGrand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. United States
53 Ct. Cl. 473 · United States Court of Claims · May 27, 1918
The land in question was west of Owosso, and the fundamental question in the case before the Supreme Court of Michigan was, as stated by that court (Bowes v. … Michigan Eailroad Company, and thereafter another case arose wherein the Supreme Court of Michigan (Fenn v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedU.S. Shelter Corp. v. United States
13 Cl. Ct. 606 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1987
Publishing Co. v. … V.
Cited 9 timesPublished199 Ct. Cl. 1002 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1972
Board. … Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, on the basis of the decision by this court in Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAleman Food Services, Inc. v. United States
37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,258 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 30, 1992
See Shank-Artukovich v. … Therefore, the Board did not have' jurisdiction over these counts. The Federal Circuit affirmed.
Cited 5 timesPublished17 F. Supp. 976 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1937
It appears, however, that no part of the dividends credited to plaintiff for the years 1924 and 1925 was withdrawn by him, and that on January 8, 1926, the board of directors of Baker Ice Machine Company, Inc., formally and … It is only one of the items going to make up its capital and surplus, Jacobus v. United States, *980 9 F.Supp. 41 , 80 Ct.Cl. 357 ; A. D. Saenger, Inc., v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMason & Hanger Co. v. United States
65 Ct. Cl. 424 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1928
See United States v. Mason & Hanger Co., 260 U. S. 323 ; Hurley-Mason Company case, 62 C. Cls. 105 . … This board made an elaborate report upon the claim in question. See vol. 2, Decisions Board of Contract Adjustment, p. 180.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 F. Supp. 736 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1934
The facts in this case are precisely the same as in the case of Lemuel Scarbrough et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 17 B. T. A. 317. … We think what was said by the Board of Tax Appeals in the above case is applicable here, and that plaintiffs are entitled to recover the sum of $472.92, with interest thereon as provided by law.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna