Case law

Hermann R. Habicht v. United States

290 F.2d 832 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

Leiner v. United States, 143 Ct.Cl. 806; Schwartz v. United States, Ct.Cl. 181 F. Supp. 408 . … In Hynning v.

Baker v. United States

17 F. Supp. 976 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1937

It appears, however, that no part of the dividends credited to plaintiff for the years 1924 and 1925 was withdrawn by him, and that on January 8, 1926, the board of directors of Baker Ice Machine Company, Inc., formally and … It is only one of the items going to make up its capital and surplus, Jacobus v. United States, *980 9 F.Supp. 41 , 80 Ct.Cl. 357 ; A. D. Saenger, Inc., v.

Wetsel-Oviatt Lumber Co.

197 Ct. Cl. 1071 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 31, 1972

Plaintiff alleges that the Government agreed to mark for cutting 12,800 M board feet of timber, more or less, but that only 6,493,670 board feet were marked, that it had inspected the area prior to the contract date and had … (See Iran Nat'l Airlines Corp. v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 504 , 360 F. 2d 640 (1966).) On March 31, 1972 the court, by order, granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Miller v. United States

34 Ct. Cl. 335 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 27, 1899

(Carlisle v. United States, 29 C. Cls. R., 414 .) Pending the motion for a new trial the Supreme Court (affirming the decision of this court in Wardwell, admx., v. United States, 32 C. Cls. … (Dwarris on Stat., 515; Muller v. United States, 4 O. Ols. R., 61.)

Nigris v. United States

169 Ct. Cl. 619 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1965

Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 (1959). … Allen v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 598 (1961) ; Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 (1959) ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 (1956).

Robert J. Cornelius, Sr. v. The United States

348 F.2d 960 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

In Miller v. … Justice Hunt, in the opinion in Garfielde v.

Thomas v. United States

38 Ct. Cl. 70 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1903

The first essential of the order subjected the officer to the performance of whatever duty might be assigned to him in connection with the duties of that board. … Thomas v. United States, post, p. —.) Judgment will be entered for the mileage unpaid, aggregating $420.81, in favor of plaintiff.

Potter v. United States

167 Ct. Cl. 28 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

United States v. Penn Foundry & Mfg. Co., 337 U.S. 198 (1949). See also Carnegie Steel Co. v. … V 3.

Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. United States

53 Ct. Cl. 473 · United States Court of Claims · May 27, 1918

The land in question was west of Owosso, and the fundamental question in the case before the Supreme Court of Michigan was, as stated by that court (Bowes v. … Michigan Eailroad Company, and thereafter another case arose wherein the Supreme Court of Michigan (Fenn v.

Aleman Food Services, Inc. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,258 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 30, 1992

See Shank-Artukovich v. … Therefore, the Board did not have' jurisdiction over these counts. The Federal Circuit affirmed.

Thorne

199 Ct. Cl. 1002 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1972

Board. … Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, on the basis of the decision by this court in Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.

Horace Heidt Foundation v. United States

170 F. Supp. 634 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959

and that the three organizers should constitute the first board of directors. … Sico Co. v. United States, 102 F.Supp. 197 , 121 Ct.Cl. 373 ; Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden, 263 U.S. 578 , 44 S.Ct. 204 , 68 L.Ed. 458 ; C. F. Mueller Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 190 F.2d 120 ; Roche’s Beach, Inc., v.

Hart Glass Mfg. Co. v. United States

48 F.2d 435 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1931

Swift & Co. v. United States, 69‘ Ct. Cl. 171. … Feather River Lumber Co. v. United States, 66 Ct. Cl. 54 ; Hazel M. Davis v. United States, 67 Ct. Cl. 643 ; Swift & Co. v. United States, 68 Ct. Cl. 97 ; Kings County Savings Institution v. Blair, 116 U. S. 200 , 6 S.

Swiss Confederation v. United States

70 F. Supp. 235 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1947

Plaintiff filed claim therefor with the Board of Economic Warfare. … United States v. New River Collieries Co., 262 U.S. 341 , 43 S.Ct. 565 , 67 L.Ed. 1014 ; United States v. Miller et al., 317 U.S. 369 , 63 S.Ct. 276 , 87 L.Ed. 336 , 147 A.L.R. 55 ; United States v.

Gladstone Booth v. The United States

436 F.2d 474 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1971

The rule has been followed ever since Smithmeyer v. … Brown v. United States, 396 F.2d 989 , 184 Ct.Cl. 501 (1968). Accordingly, defendant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

American Optical Corp. v. United States

592 F.2d 1149 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1979

The facts stated in Section I were found by the Board or are otherwise properly derived from undisputed evidence in the administrative record. See Truong Xuan True v. United States, 212 Ct. … Porter v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 355, 366 , 496 F.2d 583, 590 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 (1975); AMCO Electric v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 24, 31 , 493 F.2d 647, 650 (1974).

Los Angeles & S. L. R. v. United States

21 F. Supp. 347 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1937

Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 79 F.2d 247, 252 , certiorari denied New York Life Ins. Co. v. … In Lucas v.

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, as Trustee Under Indenture Dated November 15, 1927, Made by Henry H. Rogers, Deceased v. The United States

312 F.2d 785 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1963

See Parkway Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C.Mem.Dec., March 16, 1959; Brown v. Commissioner, 215 F.2d 697, 699-701 (C.A.5, 1954) ; Lewis v. Commissioner, 253 F.2d 821, 827-28 (C.A.2, 1958); Wilson v. … See also Brown v. Commissioner, supra. In Ruoff v.

Scarbrough v. United States

8 F. Supp. 736 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1934

The facts in this case are precisely the same as in the case of Lemuel Scarbrough et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 17 B. T. A. 317. … We think what was said by the Board of Tax Appeals in the above case is applicable here, and that plaintiffs are entitled to recover the sum of $472.92, with interest thereon as provided by law.

Levin v. United States

597 F.2d 760 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1979

His only other source of income was $5,000 in salary for sitting on the board of directors of a small oil-producing company. … Boehm v. Commissioner, 326 U.S. 287, 294 (1945).