Case law

United Foundation Corp. v. United States

126 Ct. Cl. 567 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1953

, to which board the matters were submitted for final determination. … United States v.

Citizens National Bank of Waco v. United States

551 F.2d 832 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 23, 1977

Commissioner, 57 F.2d 7 (10th Cir. 1932), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 636; Brown-Crummer Co., 19 B.T.A. 750 (1930), petition dismissed on motion of the Commissioner, 63 F.2d 996 (1933); Commissioner v. … The Board of Tax Appeals upheld the bank ( 30 B.T.A. 556 ) and the Commissioner appealed.

Hoskins Lumber Co. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,178 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 25, 1991

See generally United States v. … V.

Alaska Pacific Navigation Co. v. United States

61 Ct. Cl. 251 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1925

On that date, while the ship was at Seattle, Wash., the United States Shipping Board, under authority of the act of June 15, 1917, 40 Stat. 182 , and Executive order of July 11, 1917, delegating to that board as the representative … Louis Car Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 547, 554 , where many authorities are cited. It must be held that the settlement in this case was final and binding upon both parties.

Ayers v. United States

5 Ct. Cl. 712 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869

The case is not substantially different from that already decided by the court in the case of Tait for Browning v. The United States, (ante.) There we held proof of this kind sufficient.

Ross Engineering Co. v. United States

120 F. Supp. 188 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1954

In Fogarty v. United States, 340 U. … This decision was signed by all three members of the board on changes, including plaintiff’s representative.

Hawley v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 563 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1987

Hawley’s claim relates that the Board considered Mr. Hawley’s request of $500,000 to be inappropriate for consideration by the Board since the relief was not a correction of the record. … Decision-making bodies normally have the power to correct their own errors, Bookman v. United States, 197 *568 Ct.Cl. 108 , 453 F.2d 1263 (1972), and the Correction Board is no exception. Doyle v.

Tennessee Valley Authority v. United States

13 Cl. Ct. 692 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1987

TVA v. … The statute vests discretion in the board in fixing such rates, and the exercise of this discretion is not subject to judicial review. Mobile Oil Corp. v.

Hudson v. United States

229 Ct. Cl. 768 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1982

The CSC Appeals Review Board (ARB) refused to reopen the FEAA decision. Plaintiff then filed suit for review of the Board determination in federal district court. … Giles v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 602 , 553 F.2d 647 (1977). We therefore affirm the Board decision.

Spearin v. United States

51 Ct. Cl. 155 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1916

De Groot v. United States, 5 Wall., 419 ; United States v. Adams, 6 Wall., 101 ; Mundy v. United States, 35 C. Cls., 265 ; Atlantic, Gulf Pacific Co. v. United States, No. 25293. … In Wilson v.

Lovell v. United States

46 Ct. Cl. 318 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 27, 1911

houses in the vicinity it was necessary for him to establish boarding camps and board the men, which he did at less than the actual cost to him; and this course the claimant deemed best to continue, on the ground that to … The defendants contend, on the authority of Sweeney v. United States ( 109 U. S., 618 ), Railroad Company v. March ( 114 U. S., 549, 553 ), Hoffeld (36 C.. Cls., 230, 235), and McIntyre ( 44 C.

Ricker J. Kleinfelter, Sr. v. The United States

318 F.2d 929 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1963

The Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission, on October 30, 1957, affirmed. … Jefferson Electric Co., 291 U.S. 386, 396 , 54 S.Ct. 443 , 78 L.Ed. 859 ; British-American Oil Producing Co. v. Board of Equalization, 299 U.S. 159 , 57 S.Ct. 132 , 81 L.Ed. 95 ; United States v.

Puritan Lawn Memorial Park Cemetery v. United States

15 Cl. Ct. 234 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 22, 1988

Only directors of Puritan attended its board of directors’ meetings. … Ass’n v.

Waring v. United States

127 Ct. Cl. 336 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1954

(Runkle v. United States, 122 U. S. 543, 557 ; Cf. United States v. Page, 137 U. S. 673 ; United States v. Fletcher, 148 U. S. 84 ; French v. Weeks, 259 U. S. 326, 334 ). … Page, United States v. Fletcher, and French v. Weeks, supra.

S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. United States

28 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,411 · United States Court of Claims · May 22, 1981

On March 23, 1979, plaintiff appealed from the contracting officer’s findings of fact and decision to the Department of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals ("board”). … See generally, Zidell Explorations, Inc. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 331 , 427 F.2d 735 (1970).

Harris v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 9 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1928

We hold that a fair construction of the facts leads to the conclusion that the plaintiffs are bound by the settlement with the War Department board of appraisers. … See United States v. Adams, 7 Wall. 463, 477. Whether he had authority to cancel the contract under the decision just named, jn view of the conclusion reached, it is not necessary to decide.

Hardie v. United States

39 Ct. Cl. 250 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1904

Under the statutes quoted in this connection this court has decided in favor of the right of the claimant to recover (Irby v. United States, 18 C. Cls. … In the case of Thomas v. The United States ( 16 C. Cls.

Alvin H. Leal, Trading as Plains Construction Company, and Mercantile National Bank at Dallas, a Corporation v. United States

276 F.2d 378 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

Ragonese v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 768 , 128 Ct.Cl. 156, 162 . … Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 89 Ct.Cl. 226, 250 ; General Contracting Corp. v. United States, 96 Ct.Cl. 255, 278 .

Speros v. United States

8 Cl. Ct. 422 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1985

The agency petitioned the Appeals Review Board of the Civil Service Commission to reopen and reconsider the FEAA decision, which, on December 1, 1977, the Review Board declined to do. … DC752B00038, slip op. at 5-6 (Merit Systems Protection Board May 8, 1980).

Choggiung Ltd. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,200 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1991

Triax Co. v. … Co. v.