Case law

Alvarez v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 311 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1985

As to creditable service see Cubacub v. … See Abadilla v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 838 (1982); Menchavez v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 924 (1982); Caiyod v. United States, 231 Ct. Cl. 1004 (1982); DeGuzman v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 1005 (1982).

Nalle v. United States

51 Ct. Cl. 43 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1916

The only evidence before the court in support of the exercised right of deduction is the departmental certificate, the caption of which is quoted in Finding V. … This certificate shows that the amount of the deduction is for the pay and mileage of the members of the inspecting board for all of the time of their service in making inspections under all of the supplemental contracts

Curved Electrotype Plate Co. v. United States

50 Ct. Cl. 258 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1915

Harvey Steel Co. v. United States, 38 C. Cls., 662 , affirmed in 196 U. S., 310 ; Eclipse Bicycle Co. v. Farrow, 199 U. S., 581 . … City of Findlay v. Pertz, 66 Fed., 427 .

Richard Bruce McAulay v. The United States

305 F.2d 836 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1962

Furlong v. United States, 152 F. Supp. 238 , 138 Ct.Cl. 843 . … Part 725) provided for the appointment by designated authorities of medical boards and physical evaluation boards.

Russell Corp. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,589 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1988

Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Marley v. United States, 191 Ct.Cl. 205 , 423 F.2d 324 (1970); Astronautics Corp. v. United States, 193 Ct.Cl. 910 , 436 F.2d 430 (1971); Whittaker Corp. v.

Dante S. Reale v. The United States

413 F.2d 556 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

See, e. g., Piccone v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 752 , 407 F.2d 866 (1969); Faircloth v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 133 (1968); Biddle v. … It should never have been necessary for him to go to the Correction Board for relief at all, and that Board could not cure the legally defective release. See Friedman v.

General Aniline & Film Corporation v. The United States

360 F.2d 647 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1966

Only the Tax Court was given jurisdiction to review the action of the Board (or of its successor, the Administrator of General Services). … LeTourneau, Inc. v. Administrator of General Services, 96 U.S. App.D.C. 326, 226 F.2d 48 (1955), and cases there cited. Eversharp, Inc. v. United States, 125 F.Supp. 244 , 129 Ct.Cl. 772 (1954), and Putnam Tool Co. v.

McNulty v. United States

126 Ct. Cl. 573 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1953

For information concerning positions coming under the jurisdiction of the Establishment Boards, it will be necessary that you contact the appropriate board. … For your convenience, there is enclosed a list of Establishment Boards in the State of Florida.

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States

660 F.2d 474 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 23, 1981

Browne which was filed on February 5,1980, and was limited to the issue of liability for breach. The case has been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. … Similarly, Arcole Midwest Corp. v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 818 , 113 F.Supp. 278 (1953), and Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct.

McCanless v. United States

227 Ct. Cl. 722 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1981

Gaskins v. … Coleman v.

Steel Products Engineering Co. v. United States

78 Ct. Cl. 410 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1933

opinion of the court: The plaintiff entered into a formal contract with the defendant to construct, furnish, and deliver twelve orienta-tors, Air Corps Type A-l, “ together with one (1) complete set of direct reading, dark-brown … Braden v. The United States, 16 C.Cls. 389. If the plaintiff is entitled to recover, it must recover under the terms of the contract.

Myers v. United States

99 Ct. Cl. 158 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1943

such boarding officers shall be allowed extra compensation for services in boarding vessels at night or on Sundays or holidays at the rates prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury as herein provided, the said extra compensation … In Ferguson v.

Talisman Associates, Ltd.

202 Ct. Cl. 1119 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 25, 1973

See Produce *1120 Factors Corp. v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 572 , 467 F. 2d 1343 (1972); General Electric Co. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 678 , 440 F. 2d 420 (1971) ; Beaconwear Clothing Co. v. … L. 92-415, to the Armed Services Board' of Contract Appeals for further appropriate proceedings.

Kleen-Rite Janitorial Service, Inc.

578 F.2d 1390 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 27, 1978

"Plaintiffs first challenge to the Board decision is that there is no substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that after the deletion of the box lunch facility, plaintiffs employees had no further services to … See Rice v. United States, 192 Ct. Ct. 903, 428 F.2d 1311 (1970).

Levy

169 Ct. Cl. 1020 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 10, 1965

No fraud upon the court has been committed by defendant. (15) In Edgar v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 9 (1959), this court reconsidered; its rulings in Levy v. United States, 118 Ct. Cl. 106 (1951), and O’Brien v. … See also Larsen et al. v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 178 (1959).

W. S. King & Co. v. United States

80 Ct. Cl. 325 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1934

Co. v. United States, 58 C. … In the case of Electric Boast Company v. United States, 66 C.

Baldwin v. United States

175 Ct. Cl. 264 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1966

Smith v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 205 (1960). … Colbath v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 414 , 341 F. 2d 626 (1965). Harris v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 425 (1961).

Irby Construction Co. v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 342 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

McHale Co. v. United States, 151 F. Supp. 115 (N.D. … City Chevrolet Co. v.

Bilello v. United States

174 Ct. Cl. 1253 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1966

Bantom, et al., v. United States, 165 Ct. … And in Adams, et al., v. United States, 162 Ct.

Saylor v. United States

14 Ct. Cl. 453 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1878

On the 14th, the quartermaster at Fort Brown telegraphed him to the same effect, and that the whole amount of his contract for that post would be required by the 30th June following. … R., 470 ; Bulkley’s Case, 7 id., 547 ; Mann’s Case, 3 id., 404; Adams v. United States, 1 id., 106; Moore & Boice v. United States, id., 90, 13 How., 334 ; United States v. Speed, 8 Wall., 77 .)