Case law

Wise v. United States

18 Cl. Ct. 763 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 29, 1989

Plaintiff appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). … See Hedman v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 304, 316 , (1988); Bodine v.

Bodine

538 F.2d 348 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1976

While United States v. … United States v. Causby, supra at 261 .

Diekelman v. United States

8 Ct. Cl. 371 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1872

In construing that resolution, it will be remembered that this court has uniformly insisted on the strict construction of private acts of Congress. — Hubbell v. United States, (6 C. Cls. R., p. 53;) Atocha v. … The United States, (Ibid., 691;) Roberts v. United States, (Ibid., p. 84.)

Carrie Kramer and Julius Kramer, Executors of the Estate of Abraham Kramer, Deceased v. The United States

406 F.2d 1363 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1969

Tasty Baking Co. v. … In Worthen v.

Spearin v. United States

51 Ct. Cl. 155 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1916

De Groot v. United States, 5 Wall., 419 ; United States v. Adams, 6 Wall., 101 ; Mundy v. United States, 35 C. Cls., 265 ; Atlantic, Gulf Pacific Co. v. United States, No. 25293. … In Wilson v.

Tennessee Valley Authority v. United States

13 Cl. Ct. 692 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1987

TVA v. … The statute vests discretion in the board in fixing such rates, and the exercise of this discretion is not subject to judicial review. Mobile Oil Corp. v.

Norcoast Constructors, Inc. v. United States

477 F.2d 929 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

'We suspended for the Board to determine quantum if the parties did not agree. -They did not, and the Board awarded $40,000. This, it found, was the “salvage value” of the tank. … Once *698 this is clearly seen, no rational attack on the Board’s award on the ground of insufficiency can be made on the record before us. Bruce Constr. Corp. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 97 , 324 F.2d 516 (1963).

Troise v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,904 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1990

Jansen v. … In Ramsey v.

Ruggles v. United States

45 Ct. Cl. 86 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 10, 1910

(Carr v. Gordan, 82 Fed. Rep., 373, 379; Page v. Moffett, 85 Fed. Rep., 38-40.) Paragraph 4 of section 2 of the civil-service act of January 16, 1883 (22 Stat. … This was the view of Circuit Judge Lurton in the case of Morgan v. Nunn (84 Fed.

Curved Electrotype Plate Co. v. United States

50 Ct. Cl. 258 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1915

Harvey Steel Co. v. United States, 38 C. Cls., 662 , affirmed in 196 U. S., 310 ; Eclipse Bicycle Co. v. Farrow, 199 U. S., 581 . … City of Findlay v. Pertz, 66 Fed., 427 .

Queen v. United States

137 Ct. Cl. 167 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1956

Plaintiff’s failure to file his appeal until May 1950, almost one year after the receipt of his notice on June 7,1949, would effectively bar his recovery here under the doctrine announced by this court in Martilla v. … Cls. 177 , and more recently in Heffernan v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 839 .

Dante S. Reale v. The United States

413 F.2d 556 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

See, e. g., Piccone v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 752 , 407 F.2d 866 (1969); Faircloth v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 133 (1968); Biddle v. … It should never have been necessary for him to go to the Correction Board for relief at all, and that Board could not cure the legally defective release. See Friedman v.

Loyal Band or Group of Creek Indians v. United States

97 F. Supp. 426 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1951

United States v. Bostwick, 94 U. S. 53, 67 ; Fire Insurance Association v. Wickham, 141 U. S. 564 ; Bickley v. United States, 46 C. Cls. 77 . … It cites United States v. Goltra, 312 U.

General Aniline & Film Corporation v. The United States

360 F.2d 647 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1966

Only the Tax Court was given jurisdiction to review the action of the Board (or of its successor, the Administrator of General Services). … LeTourneau, Inc. v. Administrator of General Services, 96 U.S. App.D.C. 326, 226 F.2d 48 (1955), and cases there cited. Eversharp, Inc. v. United States, 125 F.Supp. 244 , 129 Ct.Cl. 772 (1954), and Putnam Tool Co. v.

Johnston v. United States

69 Ct. Cl. 728 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1930

Hurley, of the Shipping Board, who sent him to Mr. … On the contrary, it appears that the contract was never completed, but under the circumstances we think there was an implied contract on the part of the Shipping Board to pay the plaintiff. In Coleman v.

Feener Technical Schools, Inc. v. United States

141 F. Supp. 777 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

The Board determined that it did not and we think the Board was right. … C. 2516 (1952 Ed.); United States v. N. Y. Rayon Co., 329 U. S. 654, 658 .

McNulty v. United States

126 Ct. Cl. 573 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1953

For information concerning positions coming under the jurisdiction of the Establishment Boards, it will be necessary that you contact the appropriate board. … For your convenience, there is enclosed a list of Establishment Boards in the State of Florida.

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States

660 F.2d 474 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 23, 1981

Browne which was filed on February 5,1980, and was limited to the issue of liability for breach. The case has been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. … Similarly, Arcole Midwest Corp. v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 818 , 113 F.Supp. 278 (1953), and Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct.

McCanless v. United States

227 Ct. Cl. 722 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1981

Gaskins v. … Coleman v.

Snyder v. United States

196 Ct. Cl. 413 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1971

V 37. … See, e.g., Brozik *461 v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 546 (1967); Cooper v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 277 (1967) (reasonable doubt rule); Harris v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 538 (1966); Powers v. United States, 176 Ct.