Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

4.77s

  • Pierce v. United States

    98 Ct. Cl. 28 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1942

    Richardson v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 233 ; United States v. Wichersham, 201 U. S. 390 ; Burnap v. United States, 252 U. S. 512, 518-520 ; Norris v. United *38 States, 257 U. S. 77, 81, 82 ; Medkirk v. … Burnap v. United States, supra; Norris v. United States, supra; Medkirk v. United States, supra; Ruggles v. United States, supra; Baskin v. United States, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. United States

    24 Ct. Cl. 442 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1889

    Davis protested to4he board against the finding. The President approved the proceedings and findings of the examining boards, and Davis was thereupon retired from active service. … Gen., 414) and the case of Hunt v. The United States ( 14 Wall., 550 , and 8 C. Cls. R.., 9).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chorpenning v. United States

    3 Ct. Cl. 140 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1867

    When the subject was brought before Postmaster General Brown, several of the items specified in the act were adjusted to the satisfaction of the claimant. … In the important case before cited (Meade v. The United States, 2 C. Cls.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Esprit Corp. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,069 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1984

    E.g., Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270, 276 , 77 S.Ct. 269, 273 , 1 L.Ed.2d 306 (1957). … In a case similar to this one, a Board of Contract Appeals refused to award interest under the Contract Disputes Act when the Government delayed payment of undisputed invoices.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. United States

    78 F. Supp. 111 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1948

    Bag Co. v. United States, 289 U.S. 28 , 53 S.Ct. 454 , 77 L.Ed. 1011 ; United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co., 288 U.S. 62 , 53 S.Ct. 278 , 77 L.Ed. 619 ; United States v. … United States v. Andrews, 302 U.S. 517 , 58 S.Ct. 315 , 82 L.Ed. 398 ; United States v. Garbutt Oil Co., 302 U.S. 528 , 58 S.Ct. 320 , 82 L.Ed. 405 ; Marks v. United States, 2 Cir., 98 F.2d 564 .”

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Samples v. United States

    131 Ct. Cl. 797 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1954

    In our decision in Poggas v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 385 , we held that such employees were entitled to the benefits of Section 23 of the Act of March 28, 1934. See also Parmenter v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 35 . … We have the impression that very few wage-board employees were employed on a weekly basis, and that the statute would have had little application if it had been limited to them. *800 It will be necessary, either by a hearing

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bio-Medical Applications of Lewiston, Inc. v. United States

    17 Cl. Ct. 84 · United States Court of Claims · May 23, 1989

    Ace Construction Co. v. United States, 185 Ct.Cl. 487, 501-02 , 401 F.2d 816, 824-25 (1968) (pre-Contract Disputes Act review of board decision); Norfolk Dredging v. … Citing Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 (1941), and Board of Public Instruction of Taylor County, Florida v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robertson Co. v. United States.

    437 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

    C.A. v. United States, supra, 435 F.2d pp. 875, 881-882. Although the Board concluded that the contract drawings did not indicate the thickness of the concrete, we think its interpretation is incorrect. … V, 1965-1969)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lamborn & Co. v. United States

    65 F. Supp. 569 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1946

    In Garrett v. … In Pope v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Rothschild v. United States

    407 F.2d 404 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1969

    Brown, 380 U.S. 563 (1965) ; Evans v. Dudley, 295 F. 2d 713 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied 370 U.S. 909 (1962); Halle v. United States, 346 F. 2d 543 (4th Cir. 1965); and Humphreys v. … The case of Commissioner v. Brown, supra, cited by plaintiff is somewhat different to the other cited cases, but is also distinguishable on the facts from the instant case.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Sere v. United States

    228 Ct. Cl. 882 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 25, 1981

    Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 27 , 515 F.2d 1397 (1975). … Wilmot v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 666 (1974), citing, inter alia, Grover v. United States, 200 Ct.Cl. 337 (1973); Morelli v. United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 848 (1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morse v. United States

    46 Ct. Cl. 361 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 10, 1911

    In July of that year he was examined by a naval retiring board at Washington, D. … (Potts v. United States, 125 U. S., 173 ; Burchard v. United States, ibid., 176.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Loyal Band or Group of Creek Indians v. United States

    97 F. Supp. 426 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1951

    United States v. Bostwick, 94 U. S. 53, 67 ; Fire Insurance Association v. Wickham, 141 U. S. 564 ; Bickley v. United States, 46 C. Cls. 77 . … It cites United States v. Goltra, 312 U.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • BLH, Inc. v. United States

    31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,106 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 22, 1983

    MBC, Inc. v. Engel, 119 N.H. 8, 13 , 397 A.2d 636, 639 (1979); Bishop v. Schield Bantam Co., 293 F.Supp. 94, 96 (N.D.Iowa 1968); Canadian Ace Brewing Co. v. … California State Board of Equalization v. Coast Radio Products, 228 F.2d 520, 525 (9th Cir. 1955); H & M Moving Inc. v. United States, 204 Ct.Cl. 696, 710 , 499 F.2d 660, 668 (1974).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. United States

    121 Ct. Cl. 415 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1952

    See, for example, Str inger v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 30 , and Lamb v. United States, 116 C. Cls. 325 . Nor do we intend to give it effect beyond the natural meaning of Section 14 as a whole. … Stringer v. United States, supra; Elchibegoff v. United States, 106 C. Cls. 541 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brookfield Construction Co. v. United States

    661 F.2d 159 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 23, 1981

    The Board held that neither the contract interest clause nor the Act affected the prohibition against recovery of interest for delay. Id. … Cl. 34 , 611 F. 2d 354 (1979); Warwick Constr., Inc. v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 567 (1980); Wheeler Bros. v. United States, 226 Ct. Cl. 553 (1980); Folk Constr. Co. v. United States, 226 Ct.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Citizens Associates, Ltd. v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,332 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1987

    Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 277 (1960).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Guettel v. United States

    67 Ct. Cl. 613 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1929

    Brown procured three insurance policies on his life aggregating $200,000, each naming his wife as beneficiary. . Each policy reserved to the insured the right to change the beneficiary. … Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 , United States v. Merriam, 263 U. S. 179 . We have reached the conclusion that the policy assigned to decedent’s wife was improperly included in decedent’s gross estate.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Walden v. United States

    24 Cl. Ct. 521 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1991

    Walden v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 532 (1991). … In military pay matters, the court reviews a plaintiff’s case “through the prism of a correction board.” Cohn v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 778, 789 (1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Snyder v. United States

    196 Ct. Cl. 413 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1971

    V 37. … See, e.g., Brozik *461 v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 546 (1967); Cooper v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 277 (1967) (reasonable doubt rule); Harris v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 538 (1966); Powers v. United States, 176 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.