Case law

ITT Federal Support Services, Inc. v. United States

531 F.2d 522 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1976

V, fA. 4. b.] … See, e.g., Klebe v. United States, 263 U.S. 188, 192 (1923) ; Algonac Mfg. Co. V. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 649, 673 , 428 F. 2d 1241 , 1255 (1970) ; Swanson v.

Red Lake Band v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 362 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 28, 1989

In Fort Berthold Reservation v. … Sioux Tribe of Indians v.

Franklin Instrument Co. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,002 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1982

See Bonebrake v. Cox, 499 F.2d 951, 957 (8th Cir. 1974). … Interpreting this provision in Radiation Technology, Inc. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 227, 232-33, 366 F.2d 1003, 1005-06 (1966), and in Franklin E. Penny Co. v. United States, 207 *753 Ct.

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. United States

151 F. Supp. 734 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

In Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. United States, 129 C. … Southern Pacific Company v.

Austin Engineering Co. v. United States

88 Ct. Cl. 559 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1939

That is the date upon which plaintiffs accepted the terms of adjustment agreed upon by the Local Board of Sales Control at Boston on May 19, 1922, and signed and returned to the said board with their acceptance the voucher … In Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 71 C.

Pierce v. United States

98 Ct. Cl. 28 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1942

Richardson v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 233 ; United States v. Wichersham, 201 U. S. 390 ; Burnap v. United States, 252 U. S. 512, 518-520 ; Norris v. United *38 States, 257 U. S. 77, 81, 82 ; Medkirk v. … Burnap v. United States, supra; Norris v. United States, supra; Medkirk v. United States, supra; Ruggles v. United States, supra; Baskin v. United States, supra.

Twombly Tree Experts, Inc. v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 921 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

The plaintiff does not contend that the Board improperly excluded, or failed to consider any evidence it offered at the Board hearing. … The pending motions for summary judgment do not raise directly, any questions concerning the authority of the court, under the decision in United States v.

Bechtel v. United States

198 Ct. Cl. 929 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1972

The court interpreted United States v. … Beaver v.

Davis v. United States

24 Ct. Cl. 442 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1889

Davis protested to4he board against the finding. The President approved the proceedings and findings of the examining boards, and Davis was thereupon retired from active service. … Gen., 414) and the case of Hunt v. The United States ( 14 Wall., 550 , and 8 C. Cls. R.., 9).

Chorpenning v. United States

3 Ct. Cl. 140 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1867

When the subject was brought before Postmaster General Brown, several of the items specified in the act were adjusted to the satisfaction of the claimant. … In the important case before cited (Meade v. The United States, 2 C. Cls.

Esprit Corp. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,069 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1984

E.g., Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270, 276 , 77 S.Ct. 269, 273 , 1 L.Ed.2d 306 (1957). … In a case similar to this one, a Board of Contract Appeals refused to award interest under the Contract Disputes Act when the Government delayed payment of undisputed invoices.

Davidson

219 Ct. Cl. 666 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 9, 1979

Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 1031 (1978); Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 350 (1976). … See, e.g., Frye v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 325 (1976); Hertzog v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 377 (1964); Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1 , 310 F. 2d 381 (1962), cert. denied, sub nom. Lipp v.

Samples v. United States

131 Ct. Cl. 797 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1954

In our decision in Poggas v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 385 , we held that such employees were entitled to the benefits of Section 23 of the Act of March 28, 1934. See also Parmenter v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 35 . … We have the impression that very few wage-board employees were employed on a weekly basis, and that the statute would have had little application if it had been limited to them. *800 It will be necessary, either by a hearing

Bio-Medical Applications of Lewiston, Inc. v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 84 · United States Court of Claims · May 23, 1989

Ace Construction Co. v. United States, 185 Ct.Cl. 487, 501-02 , 401 F.2d 816, 824-25 (1968) (pre-Contract Disputes Act review of board decision); Norfolk Dredging v. … Citing Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 (1941), and Board of Public Instruction of Taylor County, Florida v.

Robertson Co. v. United States.

437 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

C.A. v. United States, supra, 435 F.2d pp. 875, 881-882. Although the Board concluded that the contract drawings did not indicate the thickness of the concrete, we think its interpretation is incorrect. … V, 1965-1969)

Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

79 Ct. Cl. 37 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

The cost of the changes was in each case where the amount was in excess of $500, referred to a board on charges for a determination of such cost, and the cost as determined by the board was added to or deducted from the contract … Co. v.

Lamborn & Co. v. United States

65 F. Supp. 569 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1946

In Garrett v. … In Pope v.

Rothschild v. United States

407 F.2d 404 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1969

Brown, 380 U.S. 563 (1965) ; Evans v. Dudley, 295 F. 2d 713 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied 370 U.S. 909 (1962); Halle v. United States, 346 F. 2d 543 (4th Cir. 1965); and Humphreys v. … The case of Commissioner v. Brown, supra, cited by plaintiff is somewhat different to the other cited cases, but is also distinguishable on the facts from the instant case.

Sere v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 882 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 25, 1981

Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 27 , 515 F.2d 1397 (1975). … Wilmot v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 666 (1974), citing, inter alia, Grover v. United States, 200 Ct.Cl. 337 (1973); Morelli v. United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 848 (1966).

American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States

55 Ct. Cl. 466 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 25, 1920

Adams v. United States, 1 C. Cls., 192 -194. … Deming v. United States, 1 C. Cls., 190, 191 .