Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

2.65s

  • Saul Freedman, D/B/A M. & E. Equipment & Parts Company v. The United States

    320 F.2d 359 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

    Co. v. … Brandt & Co. v. H. N. Morris & Co., Ltd., [1917] 2 K.B. 784; A. V. Pound & Co. v. M. W. Hardy & Co. [1956] A.C. 588 (H.L.). In Frank v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Brainard v. District of Columbia

    19 Ct. Cl. 128 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1884

    (Masterton v. Brooklyn, 7 Hill, 61 ; Seaton v. New Orleans ( 3 La. Ann., 44 ); Story v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co. ( 6 N. Y., 2 Selden, 85); Sedgwick on Damages, 137.) … June 15,1875, the board audited and allowed a bill of $1,825 for materials claimed to have been left upon the ground and used in the work by succeeding contractors. The claim was filed with the board June 15, 1875.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leal v. United States

    149 Ct. Cl. 451 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

    Ragonese v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 156, 162 . … Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. v. United States, *463 89 Ct. Cl. 226, 250 ; General Contracting Corp. v. United States, 96 Ct. Cl. 255, 278 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Citizens Associates, Ltd. v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,332 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1987

    Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 277 (1960).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Murray v. United States

    15 Cl. Ct. 17 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1988

    In Murray v. … Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Engagement at Manila Bay

    36 Ct. Cl. 206 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1901

    A petition has been presented by the administratrix of Charles V. … Barrett — who were detailed for duty on board the U. S. R. C. McCulloch April 26, 1898, and returned May 13, 1898.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • T.W.P. Co.

    650 F.2d 285 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1980

    . §§ 321 , 322 (1976) of a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (hereinafter, "Board”) which denied a portion of plaintiffs claims. … Simply because there was evidence to the contrary in the record *607 does not mean the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence, see Koppers v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 142 , 405 F. 2d 554 (1968).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hernandez v. Department of the Treasury

    230 Ct. Cl. 726 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 26, 1982

    This civilian pay case comes to us on petitioner’s timely appeal of a final Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) decision. See 5 U.S.C. §7703 (b)(l) (Supp. … See Piskadlo v. Veterans’ Administration, No. 81-1267, slip op. at 2-3 (1st Cir. Jan. 11, 1982).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Casey v. United States

    459 F.2d 495 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

    Ore. 1962), and Converse v. Earle, 43 AFTR 1308 (D.C. Ore. 1951). Plaintiffs herein rely very much on these two cases, but Converse and Waits are no longer the law in the Ninth Circuit. A careful reading of Drey v. … Kinley, 51 T.C. 1000 (1969), and Ransburg v. United States, 281 F. Supp. 324 (S.D.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Franklin Instrument Co. v. United States

    30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,002 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1982

    See Bonebrake v. Cox, 499 F.2d 951, 957 (8th Cir. 1974). … Interpreting this provision in Radiation Technology, Inc. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 227, 232-33, 366 F.2d 1003, 1005-06 (1966), and in Franklin E. Penny Co. v. United States, 207 *753 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blue Cross Ass'n v. United States

    474 F.2d 654 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1973

    Cited in the board opinion are Cramp Shipbuilding Co. v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 72 (1952) ; Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 97 F. Supp. 948 (D.C. … See Commissioner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. United States

    151 F. Supp. 734 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

    In Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. United States, 129 C. … Southern Pacific Company v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ray Myers v. The United States

    416 F.2d 1302 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1969

    Accordingly, I accept the findings of this Board”. [Emphasis supplied.] … In Watson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duke v. Department of the Air Force

    230 Ct. Cl. 977 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1982

    This case appears before the court on an appeal by petitioner from a final opinion and order of the Merit Systems Protection Board (mspb) entered on April 23, 1981. … Holder v. Department of the Army, 229 Ct. Cl. 417, 422 , 670 F.2d 1007, 1010-11 (1982).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States

    150 Ct. Cl. 760 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1960

    In short, the answer to the question is that plaintiff is bound by the decision of the Correction Board unless the same is arbitrary, capricious or unlawful. Wales v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 765 ; Gordon v. … In this case there is no allegation or proof that said action of the Correction Board was either arbitrary, capricious, or unlawful. As a matter of fact, the evidence shows that the Correction Board action was lawful.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ITT Federal Support Services, Inc. v. United States

    531 F.2d 522 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1976

    V, fA. 4. b.] … See, e.g., Klebe v. United States, 263 U.S. 188, 192 (1923) ; Algonac Mfg. Co. V. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 649, 673 , 428 F. 2d 1241 , 1255 (1970) ; Swanson v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Red Lake Band v. United States

    17 Cl. Ct. 362 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 28, 1989

    In Fort Berthold Reservation v. … Sioux Tribe of Indians v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ivy H. Smith Co. v. United States

    154 Ct. Cl. 74 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

    Corps of Engineers Claims and Appeals Board and its position was not accepted by the Board. … We are required to treat the Board’s decision as final unless it is shown that the administrative determination is arbitrary or capricious or is not based on substantial evidence. Volentine and Littleton v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Austin Engineering Co. v. United States

    88 Ct. Cl. 559 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1939

    That is the date upon which plaintiffs accepted the terms of adjustment agreed upon by the Local Board of Sales Control at Boston on May 19, 1922, and signed and returned to the said board with their acceptance the voucher … In Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 71 C.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United States

    31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,391 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 12, 1983

    Terteling & Sons, Inc. v. … See generally Brown Boveri Corp., 33 Comp.Gen. 499 (1954).

    Cited 69 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.