Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

0.41s

  • Davenpoet v. United States

    31 Ct. Cl. 430 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 29, 1896

    (Brown v. Fullerton, 13 Mees. & Wels., 556.) … (Carne v. Malins, 6 L. & Eq., 568.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Red Lake Band v. United States

    17 Cl. Ct. 362 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 28, 1989

    In Fort Berthold Reservation v. … Sioux Tribe of Indians v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Austin Engineering Co. v. United States

    88 Ct. Cl. 559 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1939

    That is the date upon which plaintiffs accepted the terms of adjustment agreed upon by the Local Board of Sales Control at Boston on May 19, 1922, and signed and returned to the said board with their acceptance the voucher … In Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 71 C.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Penn-Texas Corporation (Formerly Colt's Manufacturing Company) v. The United States

    308 F.2d 575 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1962

    See United States v. … Rejecting such cases as Commissioner v. Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc., 171 F.2d 474, 476 (C.A.2, 1948), and Commissioner v. Landers Corp., 210 F.2d 188, 191-92 (C.A.6, 1954). 5 . Commissioner v. Air Reduction.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gunston

    529 F.2d 531 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 1, 1975

    Piccone v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 752 , 407 F. 2d 866 (1969) and cases cited therein. … See, Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502 , 504 F. 2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pope v. United States

    75 Ct. Cl. 436 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 6, 1932

    Maryland Steel Co. v. United States, 235 U. S. 451 . … Mc Closkey v. United States, 66 C. Cls. 105 ; Carroll et al. v. United States, No. C-1236, decided by this court May 2, 1932.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

    147 F. Supp. 956 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957

    Article 12, section 10, of the Missouri constitution of 1875 (V. A. M. … and approved by the Governor on April 8, 1933, and thereafter in force and effect through 1934 (Laws, Missouri 1933, pages 406-408), section 1 of which is contained in section 8008, Missouri Banking Laws (section 362.075 V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nolde v. United States

    64 Ct. Cl. 204 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1927

    The resolution of the board declaring this dividend stated that it was payable out of the surplus representing undistributed profits of the years prior to March 1, 1913. … It was decided in the case of Edwards v. Douglas, 269 U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sylvia Bennett v. The United States

    356 F.2d 525 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966

    The Navy did all that was required of it by the decisions in Service v. Dulles, supra, and Vitarelli v. … In Vitarelli v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • American Diversified Corp. v. United States

    609 F.2d 442 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1979

    Co. v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 223, 256 , 531 F.2d 993, 1011 (1976). … Rated orders Obtained from Renegotiation Board Figures.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. United States

    36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,822 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1990

    In February and March of 1985, the Nags Head Board of Commissioners (Board), which was the zoning and legislative body of the town, held three meetings at which the Board discussed the need to ensure an adequate water supply … However, the Nags Head Board of Commissioners (Board) had first formally considered the new water allocation ordinance on April 1, 1985, and the need for such an ordinance had been discussed at three prior Board meetings

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Orbas & Associates v. United States

    38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,373 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1992

    Boeing Co. v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 257 at 259 , (1992); Mendenhall v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 78, 82 (1990); Claude E. Atkins Enters. v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 644, 646 (1988). … Vemo Co. v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 217, 222 (1985).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bechtel v. United States

    198 Ct. Cl. 929 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1972

    The court interpreted United States v. … Beaver v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McNaghten v. United States

    17 F. Supp. 509 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1937

    Freuler v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 35 , 54 S.Ct. 308 , 78 L.Ed. 634 . … In the case of White v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • West Coast General Corp. v. United States

    36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,773 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1989

    Services, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 257, 262 (1984). … See Tecom, Inc. v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 936 (Fed.Cir.1984); Z.A.N. Co. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 298, 304 (1984).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Warren G. Schaller v. The United States

    311 F.2d 796 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1963

    It is defendant’s position that plaintiff is entitled to recover only back pay between the date of separation and the date of re-employment by the Renegotiation Board, exclusive of legislative and in-grade increases, and … O’Brien v. United States, 124 Ct.Cl. 655 . See also Order in Cathie Lee Clark v. United States, No. 464-58, entered January 19, 3962.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wiggins

    650 F.2d 291 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1980

    Eurell v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 273 , 566 F.2d 1146 (1977). … Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hannington v. United States

    161 Ct. Cl. 432 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1963

    Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82, 84 (1921); Culligan v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl 222, 223 (1946), cert. denied 330 U.S. 848 ; Jordan v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 647, 648 (1957); Monday v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 1229, Int. Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 346 U. S. 464, 472, 474, 476-77 (1953); National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9, 17 (1962)).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Hannum v. United States

    43 Ct. Cl. 320 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 30, 1908

    October 23, 1900, he was, by order of the President, transferred to the retired list of officers of the navy upon the decision of a retiring board in conformity with the provisions of sections 1454 of the Revised Statutes … (The United States v. Thomas, 195 U. S. R., 418, 420 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Globe, Inc. v. United States

    227 Ct. Cl. 784 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1981

    Plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court, naming the bank board, GSA, and Crown Book Corporation, as defendants. … Southern California Financial Corp. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 104 , 634 F.2d 521 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 937 (1981).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.