Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
0.41s
31 Ct. Cl. 430 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 29, 1896
(Brown v. Fullerton, 13 Mees. & Wels., 556.) … (Carne v. Malins, 6 L. & Eq., 568.)
Cited 2 timesPublishedRed Lake Band v. United States
17 Cl. Ct. 362 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 28, 1989
In Fort Berthold Reservation v. … Sioux Tribe of Indians v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedAustin Engineering Co. v. United States
88 Ct. Cl. 559 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1939
That is the date upon which plaintiffs accepted the terms of adjustment agreed upon by the Local Board of Sales Control at Boston on May 19, 1922, and signed and returned to the said board with their acceptance the voucher … In Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 71 C.
Cited 17 timesPublishedPenn-Texas Corporation (Formerly Colt's Manufacturing Company) v. The United States
308 F.2d 575 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1962
See United States v. … Rejecting such cases as Commissioner v. Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc., 171 F.2d 474, 476 (C.A.2, 1948), and Commissioner v. Landers Corp., 210 F.2d 188, 191-92 (C.A.6, 1954). 5 . Commissioner v. Air Reduction.
Cited 4 timesPublished529 F.2d 531 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 1, 1975
Piccone v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 752 , 407 F. 2d 866 (1969) and cases cited therein. … See, Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502 , 504 F. 2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975).
Cited 3 timesPublished75 Ct. Cl. 436 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 6, 1932
Maryland Steel Co. v. United States, 235 U. S. 451 . … Mc Closkey v. United States, 66 C. Cls. 105 ; Carroll et al. v. United States, No. C-1236, decided by this court May 2, 1932.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. United States
147 F. Supp. 956 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957
Article 12, section 10, of the Missouri constitution of 1875 (V. A. M. … and approved by the Governor on April 8, 1933, and thereafter in force and effect through 1934 (Laws, Missouri 1933, pages 406-408), section 1 of which is contained in section 8008, Missouri Banking Laws (section 362.075 V.
Cited 1 timesPublished64 Ct. Cl. 204 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1927
The resolution of the board declaring this dividend stated that it was payable out of the surplus representing undistributed profits of the years prior to March 1, 1913. … It was decided in the case of Edwards v. Douglas, 269 U.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSylvia Bennett v. The United States
356 F.2d 525 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966
The Navy did all that was required of it by the decisions in Service v. Dulles, supra, and Vitarelli v. … In Vitarelli v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAmerican Diversified Corp. v. United States
609 F.2d 442 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1979
Co. v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 223, 256 , 531 F.2d 993, 1011 (1976). … Rated orders Obtained from Renegotiation Board Figures.
Cited 2 timesPublished36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,822 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1990
In February and March of 1985, the Nags Head Board of Commissioners (Board), which was the zoning and legislative body of the town, held three meetings at which the Board discussed the need to ensure an adequate water supply … However, the Nags Head Board of Commissioners (Board) had first formally considered the new water allocation ordinance on April 1, 1985, and the need for such an ordinance had been discussed at three prior Board meetings
Cited 25 timesPublishedOrbas & Associates v. United States
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,373 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1992
Boeing Co. v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 257 at 259 , (1992); Mendenhall v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 78, 82 (1990); Claude E. Atkins Enters. v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 644, 646 (1988). … Vemo Co. v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 217, 222 (1985).
Cited 6 timesPublished198 Ct. Cl. 929 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1972
The court interpreted United States v. … Beaver v.
Cited 2 timesPublished17 F. Supp. 509 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1937
Freuler v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 35 , 54 S.Ct. 308 , 78 L.Ed. 634 . … In the case of White v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWest Coast General Corp. v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,773 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1989
Services, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 257, 262 (1984). … See Tecom, Inc. v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 936 (Fed.Cir.1984); Z.A.N. Co. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 298, 304 (1984).
Cited 9 timesPublishedWarren G. Schaller v. The United States
311 F.2d 796 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1963
It is defendant’s position that plaintiff is entitled to recover only back pay between the date of separation and the date of re-employment by the Renegotiation Board, exclusive of legislative and in-grade increases, and … O’Brien v. United States, 124 Ct.Cl. 655 . See also Order in Cathie Lee Clark v. United States, No. 464-58, entered January 19, 3962.
Cited 4 timesPublished650 F.2d 291 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1980
Eurell v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 273 , 566 F.2d 1146 (1977). … Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublished161 Ct. Cl. 432 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1963
Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82, 84 (1921); Culligan v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl 222, 223 (1946), cert. denied 330 U.S. 848 ; Jordan v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 647, 648 (1957); Monday v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 1229, Int. Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 346 U. S. 464, 472, 474, 476-77 (1953); National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9, 17 (1962)).
Cited 25 timesPublished43 Ct. Cl. 320 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 30, 1908
October 23, 1900, he was, by order of the President, transferred to the retired list of officers of the navy upon the decision of a retiring board in conformity with the provisions of sections 1454 of the Revised Statutes … (The United States v. Thomas, 195 U. S. R., 418, 420 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished227 Ct. Cl. 784 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1981
Plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court, naming the bank board, GSA, and Crown Book Corporation, as defendants. … Southern California Financial Corp. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 104 , 634 F.2d 521 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 937 (1981).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna