Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

0.29s

  • Jackson v. United States

    179 Ct. Cl. 29 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1967

    Singleton, 361 U.S. 234 (1960), Grisham v. Hagan, 361 U.S. 278 (1960), McElroy v. Guagliardo, 361 U.S. 281 (1960), and Wilson v. … As stated in Nicholas v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. United States

    230 Ct. Cl. 827 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1982

    Upon reconsidering the case in 1980, pursuant to the plaintiffs request, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals reaffirmed the 1961 ruling. … Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974). 3.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Della Valle v. United States

    231 Ct. Cl. 818 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1982

    Plaintiff refers this court, however, to Ralpho v. Bell, 569 F.2d 607 (D.C. … We conclude, though, that Ralpho v. Bell does not apply. There is a great difference between screening a claimant from virtually all information concerning his claim, as happened in Ralpho v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Buffalo Brake Beam Co. v. United States

    19 F. Supp. 250 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1937

    See Appeal of American La Dentelle, 1 B.T.A. 575 ; Baker-Vawter Co. v. Com’r, 7 B.T.A. 594 ; and Sweets Co. of America v. Com’r, 12 B.T.A. 1285 .” … The rule laid down in the Board cases referred to was approved by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in American Paper Exports, Inc., et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. United States

    31 Ct. Cl. 314 · United States Court of Claims · May 20, 1896

    But in the case of The United States v. Harmon ( 147 U. S. … (Brown's a Case, 6 C. Cls. R., 174 ; United States v. O’ Grady, 22 Wall. R., 641.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Swiss Federal Railways v. United States

    112 F. Supp. 357 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1953

    Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States, 13 Sup. Ct. 622; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 299 ; Olson v. United States, 292 U. S. 246 ; United States v. New River Collieries Co ., 262 U. … S. 341 ; Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States, 265 U. S. 106 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • John J. Harte Co. v. United States

    91 F. Supp. 753 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1950

    United States v. Blair, 321 U. S. 730, 735 . This mechanism, moreover, is exclusive in nature. Solely through its operation may claims be made and adjudicated as to matters arising under the contract. United States v. … Blair, supra, 735 ; United States v. Callahan Walker Co., 317 U. S. 56, 61 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Swift & Co. v. United States

    43 Ct. Cl. 409 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1908

    Clause 2 of the contract of July 1, 1898, provided for the care and refrigeration of the beef on board the steamships while en route to Cuba, the claimant agreeing at its own expense to erect and equip on board said vessels … McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat., 316 . Claimant contracted to furnish chilled, refrigerated beef to a “ moving army ” engaged in hostilities.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seiberling v. United States

    22 F. Supp. 397 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1938

    The case of Reid v. … We think this case falls within the decision in the following cases: Johnson v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 360 ; United States v. Andrews (supra); United States v. Garbutt Oil Company, 302 U.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brad Foote Gear Works, Inc. v. United States

    288 F.2d 894 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961

    In Brad Foote Gear Works, Inc. v. United States, decided with Junior Toy Corp. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Monroe M. Tapper & Associates

    202 Ct. Cl. 1084 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1973

    Contracts; decision of Contract Appeals Board on rema/nd; review of by court; jwisdiction of Board.- — This case grew out of a contract between plaintiff and the then Post Office Department. … Monett v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 1 , 5 n. 4, 419 F. 2d 434 , 436 n. 4 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 846 (1970).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. United States

    56 F.2d 897 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1932

    McCoach v. Insurance Co. of North America, supra; United States v. Boston Insurance Co. supra; and Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. United States, supra. … A. 13, the board held, in considering the Revenue Acts of 1921 and 1924, that the term “reserve funds” has the same meaning under all acts. In Midland Mutual Life. Insurance Co. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Standard-Southern Corp.

    650 F.2d 286 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1980

    Our leading case on this is *672 Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 135 , 475 F.2d 630 (1973). … The more recent case, Applied Devices Corp. v. United States, 219 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodrich Engineering Corp. v. United States

    29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,639 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1982

    See generally Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 142, 147-151 , 405 F.2d 554, 556-559 (1968); Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 364, 368 (1964), cert denied, 382 U.S. 841 (1965). … Thus, the Board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and we so hold.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gunn-Williams v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,106 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1984

    Corp. v. United States, supra, and Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United States, supra. … Skelly and Loy v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Penn-Texas Corporation (Formerly Colt's Manufacturing Company) v. The United States

    308 F.2d 575 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1962

    See United States v. … Rejecting such cases as Commissioner v. Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc., 171 F.2d 474, 476 (C.A.2, 1948), and Commissioner v. Landers Corp., 210 F.2d 188, 191-92 (C.A.6, 1954). 5 . Commissioner v. Air Reduction.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gleason v. District of Columbia

    19 Ct. Cl. 430 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1884

    The Board of Public Works ceased to. have any existence after the organization of the Board of Audit. … The substance of this controversy was before the Supreme 'Court of the United States in the case of Cowdrey v. Vandenburgh ( 101 U. S. R., 572 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Financial Associates, Ltd. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,681 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 3, 1984

    Brown, Disbursing Officer.” … See, e.g., Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 2213 n. 10, 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 , 326 n. 5, 99 S.Ct. 645 , 649 n. 5, 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • M. A. Long Co. v. United States

    79 Ct. Cl. 656 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1934

    Crooks v. Harrelson, 282 U.S. 55 . The cost of timbering fell on the Government.’ … Clark v. United States, 95 U.S. 539 ; District of Columbia v. Barnes, 191 U.S. 146 ; Wood et al. v. United States, 49 C.Cls. 119; Wilcox v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. United States

    36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,822 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1990

    In February and March of 1985, the Nags Head Board of Commissioners (Board), which was the zoning and legislative body of the town, held three meetings at which the Board discussed the need to ensure an adequate water supply … However, the Nags Head Board of Commissioners (Board) had first formally considered the new water allocation ordinance on April 1, 1985, and the need for such an ordinance had been discussed at three prior Board meetings

    Cited 25 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.