Case law

City of Wheeling v. United States

20 Cl. Ct. 659 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1990

Wheeling initiated an administrative appeal which culminated in a Board of Assistance Appeals (Board) decision on October 31, 1983. … See Massachusetts v.

Mallow v. United States

161 Ct. Cl. 207 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1963

The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for review by a board of review. 16. … United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1, 14-15 (1926).

Hercules Inc. v. United States

38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,387 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 17, 1992

Hercules, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 301 (1991). Further briefing was directed. The case is once again before us on plaintiffs renewed motion for summary judgment and defendant’s opposition thereto. … In a preamble issued by the Cost Accounting Standards Board in conjunction with its original publication of CAS 403, the Board explained that the basis for this rule *666 is a recognition that state income taxes are akin

Gunn-Williams v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,106 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1984

Corp. v. United States, supra, and Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United States, supra. … Skelly and Loy v.

Discount Construction Co. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,200 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 6, 1982

The board has had no opportunity to consider the issue, and this court may not in a Wunderlich Act case go outside the administrative record. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 716 (1963). … There are also strong prudential considerations supporting remand to the board. It is the board, after all, whose decision is undermined by Erlandson’s alleged misconduct.

The Dearborn Company v. The United States. The Dearborn Company v. The United States

444 F.2d 1145 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1971

That issue was recently dealt with by this court in Waterman, Largen & Co. v. United States, 419 F.2d 845 , 189 Ct.Cl. 364 (1969), and FS Services, Inc. v. … Smith & Welton, Inc. v. United States, 164 F.Supp. 605 (E.D.Va.1958); Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. United States, 303 F.2d 916 , 157 Ct.Cl. 886 (1962); FS Services, Inc. v.

Robert McMullan & Sons, Inc.

650 F.2d 292 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 31, 1980

. §§321 , 322 (1976), of a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board), which denied plaintiffs claims for an equitable adjustment. … Co. v. United States, 188 Ct.Cl. 1062, 1077 , 412 F.2d 1325, 1333 (1969); See Arundel Corp. v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 84 , 515 F.2d 1116 (1975).

Rankin v. United States

98 Ct. Cl. 357 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1943

Prosser v. Finn, 208 U. S. 67 ; Waskey v. Hammer, 223 U. S. 85 ; Ewert v. Bluejacket, 259 U. S. 129 . … Beach v. United States, 226 U. S. 243, 260 ; Vlachos v. United States, 90 C. Cls. 165 ; The Curved Electrotype Plate Co. v. United States, 50 C. Cls. 258 . In Michigan Steel Box Co. v. United States, 49 C.

Pittman v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 321 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1984

Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 397-402 , 101 S.Ct. 2424, 2427-2429 , 69 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981); Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153 , 99 S.Ct. 970, 973 , 59 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979); Brown v. … Margolies, 279 U.S. 218, 225 , 49 S.Ct. 310, 313 , 73 L.Ed. 669 (1929); Bank of Montreal v. Kough, 612 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1980); Brown v. Kenron Aluminum and Glass Corp., 477 F.2d 526, 531 (8th Cir.1973); Moyer v.

James D. Stephens v. The United States

358 F.2d 951 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966

Johnston v. United States, 157 Ct.Cl. 474 (1962); Towell v. United States, supra; Furlong v. United States, supra; Wales v. United States, supra; Woodford v. United States, supra. … In Gwin v.

Swift & Co. v. United States

38 F.2d 365 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1930

This construction prevailed at all times prior to the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in Sweets Company of America v. … Corp., et al. v.

Standard-Southern Corp.

650 F.2d 286 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1980

Our leading case on this is *672 Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 135 , 475 F.2d 630 (1973). … The more recent case, Applied Devices Corp. v. United States, 219 Ct.

Bulger Block Coal Co. v. United States

48 F.2d 675 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1931

One is the ease of Eisner v. … Terry v. Eagle Lock Co., 47 Conn. 141 ; State v. Baltimore, etc., R. Co., 6 Gill (Md.) 363, 386. The opinion in the ease of United States v. Mellon (D.

Lee v. United States

229 Ct. Cl. 567 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1981

However, the half-a-loaf doctrine applies only when the relief sought in court was actually demanded of the Correction Board (see, e.g., Denton v. United States, 204 Ct. … But plaintiff apparently requested only a change in the nature of the discharge, not in the date, and his request to the Board was permissive, not mandatory. E.g. Mathis v. United States, supra, 183 Ct.

France et Canada Cie Francaise de Navigation v. United States

75 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1932

Finding V deals with the routine system of accounting through the New York Corporation and shows that at no-time was the New York Corporation indebted to the plaintiff or its predecessor, but that both were at all times indebted … Cory Bros. & Co. v. United States, 51 Fed. (2d) 1010. No jurisdictional question was raised.

Gleason v. District of Columbia

19 Ct. Cl. 430 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1884

The Board of Public Works ceased to. have any existence after the organization of the Board of Audit. … The substance of this controversy was before the Supreme 'Court of the United States in the case of Cowdrey v. Vandenburgh ( 101 U. S. R., 572 ).

Metcalf & Associates

503 F.2d 1406 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1974

Phase V contract was cancelled when work had reached the completed working drawing stage because. plaintiff’s plans for the multi-climate complex resulted in projected costs of more than twice the contract estimate, and defendant … Trial Judge Miller concluded that the Board’s ruling in this regard is supported by decisions of this court, including Monroe Garment Co. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 324 , 488 F. 2d 989 (1973).

Miller v. United States

652 F.2d 70 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 24, 1981

The United States Civil Service Commission Appeals Review Board (board) affirmed the FEAA decision on April 21, 1977. Plaintiff argues that his removal was procedurally defective for several reasons. … Moreover, we do not understand plaintiffs reliance on Ricucci v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 1 , 425 F.2d 1252 (1970).

New York & Baltimore Transportation Line v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 491 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1929

S. 75 ; Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 246, 248 ; Consolidation Coal Co. v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 608 , 270 U. S. 664 ; Pocahontas Fuel Co. v. United States, 01 C. Cls. 231 ; Alcock & Co. v. … Cls. 312, 325 ; Penn Chemical Co. v. *505 United States, 63 C. Cls. 15, 26 ; New River Collieries Co. et al. v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 205 (certiorari denied October 15, 1928); William C. Atwater & Co., Inc. v.

Borden v. United States

116 F. Supp. 873 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1953

In the recent case of Edelstein v. … See also Kenny v. United States, 62 Ct.Cl. 328 . In Kyle v.