Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

3.29s

  • Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States

    9 Cl. Ct. 336 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1986

    In Neely v. … Sioux Tribe v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Gross v. United States

    531 F.2d 482 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1976

    A Navy Board of Review affirmed the findings and sentence as modified; the Court of Military Appeals denied a petition for grant of review; the Board for Correction of *74 Naval Records rejected plaintiff’s application for … This general rule of exhaustion does not in itself bar Gross’s suit; he sought review from all military courts and boards that could have reviewed his case.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • A.C. Seeman, Inc. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,679 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1984

    United States, 343 F.2d 943 , 170 Ct.Cl. 389 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 , 86 S.Ct. 545 , 15 L.Ed.2d 468 (1966); Brown v. United States, 358 F.2d 1002 , 175 Ct.Cl. 343 (1966). … Co. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Schutt Construction Co. v. United States

    353 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

    The Board also denied recovery of the survey expenses. Schutt was paid a total of $135,400 as a result of the Board’s decision. … Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States, supra. However, the further conclusion of the Board that recovery should be limited to the excess acreage over 15 percent is not based on any strong legal ground.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Heid Bros. v. United States

    69 Ct. Cl. 704 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1930

    The facts in the case presented are identical with the facts before this court in Heid Brothers, Inc., v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 87 . … He never approved the findings of the claims board or took any action whatever in connection therewith.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Allegheny Steel Co. v. United States

    18 F. Supp. 398 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1937

    In Lucas v. … The case of Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 , 54 S.Ct. 356, 360 , 78 L.Ed. 725 , involved a question as to the right to deduct certain expenses from gross income in making up a return.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. United States

    23 Ct. Cl. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1888

    In United States v. … (Murray v. Gibson, 15 How., 421, 423 ; McEwen v. Den, 24 How., 242, 244; Harvey v. Tyler, 2 Wall., 328, 347 ; Sohn v. Waterson, 17 Wall., 596, 599 ; Twenty Per Cent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baginsky v. United States

    10 Cl. Ct. 803 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 19, 1986

    See Bush v. Lucas, 462 U.S. 367 , 385 n. 28, 103 S.Ct. 2404 , 2415 n. 28, 76 L.Ed.2d 648 (1983); INS v. … In Featheringill v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dillingham Transportation Building, Ltd. v. United States

    146 F. Supp. 953 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957

    In Roche’s Beach, Inc., v. … Universal Oil Products Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. United States

    3 F. Supp. 655 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1933

    Ed. 968 , and in Denman v. Slayton, 282 U. S. 514 , 51 S. Ct. 269 , 75 L. Ed. 500 . … We fail to see the parallel between the question presented in this case and that decided in National Life Insurance Co. v. United States, supra, and in Denman v. Slayton, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gernand v. United States

    412 F.2d 1190 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

    Hutton v. United, States, 154 Ct. Cl. 34 (1961)); MoDougal v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 90 , 149 F. Supp. 651 (1957); Adler et al. v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 200 , 146 F. … Gernand v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 936 (1966). See Gernand v. United States, supra. See Estate of Mabel Lloyd Ridgely v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 1220, 1231, fn. 5 (1667).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • DeBusk v. United States

    132 Ct. Cl. 790 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1955

    Bailey v. Richardson, 182 F. 2d 46 . Certainly giving plaintiff an “Unsatisfactory” performance rating is not punishment. If it is not punishment, then the hearing thereon has not subjected plaintiff to jeopardy. … See Keim v. United States, 177 U. S. 290 . Neither section 652 of Title 5 of the United States Code (1952 Ed.) nor the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, supra, contemplates such a restriction upon executive discretion.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Miller v. United States

    69 Ct. Cl. 750 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1930

    This final board designated in the department as the “Honest and Faithful Board,” a designation adopted by Mr. Justice Clarke in his opinion in French v. Weeks, 259 U. … The Supreme Court in French v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Guantanamo Sugar Co. v. United States

    94 Ct. Cl. 569 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1941

    Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United States, 283 U. … See Bull v. United States, 295 U. S. 247 ; Lit v. United States (E. D. Pa.) 18 F. Supp. 435 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Surety Co. v. United States

    72 Ct. Cl. 369 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931

    Parish v. United States, 57 C. Cls. 529 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 428 ; Mitchell v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 443 , affirmed 267 U. S. 341 ; Jackson v. United States, 230 U. S. 1 ; Bedford v. … Compare American Smelting Co. v. United States, 259 U. S. 75, 78 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parish v. United States

    98 F. Supp. 347 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1951

    Wartime construction was largely regulated by the War Production Board, and the Government agencies concerned interpreted WPB Construction Conservation Order L-41, as amended, to require authorization by that board before … Thomas Earle & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 90 Ct.Cl. 308 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Eastman Reforestation Co. v. United States

    29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,900 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1981

    All of the submissions have been carefully examined and, on the basis thereof, without oral argument, we find that the decision of the Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals (board) is correct as a matter of … Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 180 , 351 F.2d 956 (1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Forest Environmental Services Co. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,683 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1984

    Louisiana-Pacific v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 757 (1981). … This resulted in a 316,000 board feet underrun.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,267 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1987

    Co. v. … Indeed, the court notes that even the appellate court agreed and held that “the Board proceedings in this case were so defective that the Board’s findings and decision are not entitled to the usual finality accorded Board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Penker Construction Co. v. United States

    96 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1942

    This court in Barlow v. United States, 35 C. … See Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 154, 185 ; Lawman v. United States, 41 C. Cls. 470 ; Carroll et al. v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 103 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.