Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
3.29s
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States
9 Cl. Ct. 336 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1986
In Neely v. … Sioux Tribe v.
Cited 17 timesPublished531 F.2d 482 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1976
A Navy Board of Review affirmed the findings and sentence as modified; the Court of Military Appeals denied a petition for grant of review; the Board for Correction of *74 Naval Records rejected plaintiff’s application for … This general rule of exhaustion does not in itself bar Gross’s suit; he sought review from all military courts and boards that could have reviewed his case.
Cited 8 timesPublishedA.C. Seeman, Inc. v. United States
32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,679 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1984
United States, 343 F.2d 943 , 170 Ct.Cl. 389 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 , 86 S.Ct. 545 , 15 L.Ed.2d 468 (1966); Brown v. United States, 358 F.2d 1002 , 175 Ct.Cl. 343 (1966). … Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedSchutt Construction Co. v. United States
353 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965
The Board also denied recovery of the survey expenses. Schutt was paid a total of $135,400 as a result of the Board’s decision. … Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States, supra. However, the further conclusion of the Board that recovery should be limited to the excess acreage over 15 percent is not based on any strong legal ground.
Cited 0 timesPublished69 Ct. Cl. 704 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1930
The facts in the case presented are identical with the facts before this court in Heid Brothers, Inc., v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 87 . … He never approved the findings of the claims board or took any action whatever in connection therewith.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAllegheny Steel Co. v. United States
18 F. Supp. 398 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1937
In Lucas v. … The case of Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 , 54 S.Ct. 356, 360 , 78 L.Ed. 725 , involved a question as to the right to deduct certain expenses from gross income in making up a return.
Cited 2 timesPublished23 Ct. Cl. 363 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1888
In United States v. … (Murray v. Gibson, 15 How., 421, 423 ; McEwen v. Den, 24 How., 242, 244; Harvey v. Tyler, 2 Wall., 328, 347 ; Sohn v. Waterson, 17 Wall., 596, 599 ; Twenty Per Cent.
Cited 1 timesPublished10 Cl. Ct. 803 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 19, 1986
See Bush v. Lucas, 462 U.S. 367 , 385 n. 28, 103 S.Ct. 2404 , 2415 n. 28, 76 L.Ed.2d 648 (1983); INS v. … In Featheringill v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDillingham Transportation Building, Ltd. v. United States
146 F. Supp. 953 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957
In Roche’s Beach, Inc., v. … Universal Oil Products Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedPhiladelphia Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. United States
3 F. Supp. 655 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1933
Ed. 968 , and in Denman v. Slayton, 282 U. S. 514 , 51 S. Ct. 269 , 75 L. Ed. 500 . … We fail to see the parallel between the question presented in this case and that decided in National Life Insurance Co. v. United States, supra, and in Denman v. Slayton, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublished412 F.2d 1190 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969
Hutton v. United, States, 154 Ct. Cl. 34 (1961)); MoDougal v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 90 , 149 F. Supp. 651 (1957); Adler et al. v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 200 , 146 F. … Gernand v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 936 (1966). See Gernand v. United States, supra. See Estate of Mabel Lloyd Ridgely v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 1220, 1231, fn. 5 (1667).
Cited 5 timesPublished132 Ct. Cl. 790 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1955
Bailey v. Richardson, 182 F. 2d 46 . Certainly giving plaintiff an “Unsatisfactory” performance rating is not punishment. If it is not punishment, then the hearing thereon has not subjected plaintiff to jeopardy. … See Keim v. United States, 177 U. S. 290 . Neither section 652 of Title 5 of the United States Code (1952 Ed.) nor the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, supra, contemplates such a restriction upon executive discretion.
Cited 21 timesPublished69 Ct. Cl. 750 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1930
This final board designated in the department as the “Honest and Faithful Board,” a designation adopted by Mr. Justice Clarke in his opinion in French v. Weeks, 259 U. … The Supreme Court in French v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGuantanamo Sugar Co. v. United States
94 Ct. Cl. 569 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1941
Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United States, 283 U. … See Bull v. United States, 295 U. S. 247 ; Lit v. United States (E. D. Pa.) 18 F. Supp. 435 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Surety Co. v. United States
72 Ct. Cl. 369 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931
Parish v. United States, 57 C. Cls. 529 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 428 ; Mitchell v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 443 , affirmed 267 U. S. 341 ; Jackson v. United States, 230 U. S. 1 ; Bedford v. … Compare American Smelting Co. v. United States, 259 U. S. 75, 78 .
Cited 0 timesPublished98 F. Supp. 347 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1951
Wartime construction was largely regulated by the War Production Board, and the Government agencies concerned interpreted WPB Construction Conservation Order L-41, as amended, to require authorization by that board before … Thomas Earle & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 90 Ct.Cl. 308 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedEastman Reforestation Co. v. United States
29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,900 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1981
All of the submissions have been carefully examined and, on the basis thereof, without oral argument, we find that the decision of the Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals (board) is correct as a matter of … Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 180 , 351 F.2d 956 (1965).
Cited 0 timesPublishedForest Environmental Services Co. v. United States
32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,683 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1984
Louisiana-Pacific v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 757 (1981). … This resulted in a 316,000 board feet underrun.
Cited 13 timesPublishedBaltimore Contractors, Inc. v. United States
34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,267 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 30, 1987
Co. v. … Indeed, the court notes that even the appellate court agreed and held that “the Board proceedings in this case were so defective that the Board’s findings and decision are not entitled to the usual finality accorded Board
Cited 5 timesPublishedPenker Construction Co. v. United States
96 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1942
This court in Barlow v. United States, 35 C. … See Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 154, 185 ; Lawman v. United States, 41 C. Cls. 470 ; Carroll et al. v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 103 .
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna