Case law

S. Harvey Klein, Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Beam Radionics Corp. v. United States

285 F.2d 778 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961

In that ease the Supreme Court held that the Act of June 15, 1917, 40 Stat. 182 , as construed in Russell Motor Car Co. v. … decision in Volentine & Littleton v.

North Dakota-Montana Wheat Growers Ass'n v. United States

94 Ct. Cl. 665 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1941

Redfield v. Parks, 132 U. S. 239 ; United States v. Beebe, 127 U. S. 338 ; United States v. Thompson, 98 U. S. 486 ; United States v. Whited & Wheless, 246 U. S. 552 ; Chesapeake & D. Canal Co. v. United States, 250 U. … S. 123 ; United States v. Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co., 118 U. S. 120 ; Metropolitan R. Co. v. District of Columbia, 132 U. S. 1 .

Eversharp, Inc. v. United States

147 F. Supp. 502 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

The War Department Price Adjustment Board determined that it had realized excessive profits of $775,459 on such contracts in 1944. … The War Contracts Price Adjustment Board purported to set a rate of six percent by regulation.

Del E. Webb Corp.

652 F.2d 69 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1981

The board then properly held that such was an impermissible result. Monroe M. Tapper & Assoc. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 27, 34 , 602 F.2d 311, 315 (1979); ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States, 207 Ct. … Laka Tool & Stamping Co. v. United States, ante at 83, 639 F.2d 738 (1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1086 (1981); Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 533, 544 , 513 F.2d 588, 593-94 (1975); Koppers Co. v.

Dunn v. United States

21 Ct. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1886

Section 290 provides that “ in case any officer of the Navy or Marine Corps on board a vessel in the employ of the United *23 States” shall have lost personal effects, he may be allowed one month’s sea pay. … This view of the case is sustained by the Supreme Court in Wilkes v. Dinsman ( 7 Howard, 89 ). That case originated under the Act of March 2, 1837 (5 Stat.

Martin-Marietta Corporation v. The United States

418 F.2d 502 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1969

See also, Standard Oil Co.- v. United States, 224 F.Supp. 913 (S.D.N.Y.1963). … For cases in which the section 1481(b) credit provision was properly applicable, see Standard Roofing & Material Co. v. United States, 199 F.2d 607 (10th Cir. 1952) ; Overlakes Corp. v.

Abbate v. United States

123 Ct. Cl. 769 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

The plaintiffs rely upon our decision in Stringer v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 30 . … To be sure the National Labor Relations Act expressly authorizes the Board to award back pay, in addition to restoration.

Parks v. United States

147 F. Supp. 261 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957

Plaintiff appealed the Seventh Region decision to the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Review in Washington, D. C. The board upheld the decision of the Seventh Region. … Cls. 486 ; Eberlein v. United States, 257 U. S. 82 ; Bryan v. United States, 128 C. Cls. 541 ; Ciaffone v. United States, 126 C. Cls. 532 .

Whitlock Corporation v. United States

159 F. Supp. 602 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1958

Volentine and Littleton v. United States, 145 F.Supp. 952 , 136 Ct.Cl. 638 . Plaintiff has made no such showing here. … Mohawk Condensed Milk Company v. United States, 48 F.2d 682 , 70 Ct.Cl. 671 ; Lomax Transportation Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 331, 333 .

Jackson v. United States

179 Ct. Cl. 29 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1967

Singleton, 361 U.S. 234 (1960), Grisham v. Hagan, 361 U.S. 278 (1960), McElroy v. Guagliardo, 361 U.S. 281 (1960), and Wilson v. … As stated in Nicholas v.

Curtis W. Garrott v. The United States

340 F.2d 615 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965

Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 ; MacLeod v. Fernandez, 1 Cir., 101 F.2d 20 , certiorari denied Taste v. … Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74 [ 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 ]. * * * ” [ 163 F.Supp. at p. 598 , at p. 15.]

Cole v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 890 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 25, 1981

Sweatt v. *892 United States, ante at 833, 835; Artis v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 732, 736-39 , 506 F.2d 1387, 1388-90 (1974). There are no extenuating circumstances in this case, as there were in Hagarty v. … In Dumas v. United States, 223 Ct.

Denny v. United States

162 Ct. Cl. 640 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

This is another case in line with our recent decisions in Jones v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 119 , 282 F. 2d 906 (1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 880 (1961); Hoag, et al. v. … The petition of Rodney Browne Starr (No. 4) is dismissed.

Butkin Precision Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

544 F.2d 499 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1976

V. … Ball Co. v. United States, 209 Ct.

Navajo Tribe of Indians

193 Ct. Cl. 1095 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1971

Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corp., 276 U.S. 575 (1928); British-American Oil Producing Co. v. Board of Equalization of Montana, 299 U.S. 159 (1936), and Board of County Comm'rs v. Seber, 318 U.S. 705 (1943).

Webb

650 F.2d 287 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1980

Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 (1953); Furlong v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 557, 563 (1961); see also Cooper v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 277, 288 (1967). Armstrong v. United States, 205 Ct. … Cl. 754, 762 (1974); Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300, 304 (1973). Armstrong v. United States, supra note 2, 205 Ct. Cl. at 756 ; Biddle v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 87 (1968); Caddington v.

Crow v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,305 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 3, 1982

Co. v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 487, 500 , 401 F.2d 816, 823 (1968). See generally Nager Electric Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 234, 242-44 , 368 F.2d 847, 853-54 (1966). … Plaintiff alleges no error of law in the board’s decision and our review under the Wunderlich Act of the board’s findings of fact is very limited. 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1976); Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct.

Carol D. Heers, Harold W. Heers, and Charles M. Heers, Trading as Heers Associates, a California Partnership v. The United States

357 F.2d 344 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 13, 1964

Miller, Inc. v. United States. 4 “ * * * In essence, that Act is designed to provide housing for armed services personnel without the use of appropriated funds. … Miller, Inc. v. United States, Ct.Cl. No., 3-62, decided April 5, 1963, p. 19 (and cases cited).

Powers

650 F.2d 287 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 25, 1980

McCourt v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 894, 895 (1977); see Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240 (1975); 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1976). … Applications to a military records correction board are permissive, not mandatory, and do not serve to toll the statute of limitations. E.g., Ramsey v. United States, 215 Ct.

Stanley Securities Co. v. United States

38 F.2d 907 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1930

Edgar Estates Corporation v. United States, 65 Ct. Cl. 415 ; Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107 , 31 S. Ct. 342 , 55 L. Ed. 389 , Ann. Cas. 1912B, 1312. … Edwards v. Chile Copper Co., 270 U. S. 452 , 46 S. Ct. 345, 346 , 70 L. Ed. 678 . In Edgar Estates Corporation v.