Case law

Umbeck v. United States

149 Ct. Cl. 418 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

Higgins v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 960 ; Denning v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 369 ; Chollar v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 338 . … United States v. Jones, 131 U.S. 1 ; United States v. Alire, 6 Wall. 573 ; Hart v. United States, 91 Ct. Cl. 308 .

Manufacturers Service Co. v. United States

582 F.2d 561 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1978

Steamship Co. v. United States, 198 Ct. … In Instrument Systems Corp. v. United States, 212 Ct.

Hunt and Willett, Inc., for Itself and for the Use of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. The United States

351 F.2d 980 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1965

Co. v. … WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 323 F.2d 874 , decided Oct. 11, 1963; Wingate Constr. Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., No. 394-60, decided Jan. 24, 1964; Potter v.

Berdan Fire-Arms Manufacturing Co. v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 355 · United States Court of Claims · May 19, 1890

General Hancock was the president of this board; hence it has -since been known as the u Hancock Board.” … , in effect, recommended by the board for adoption.

Hazelhurst Oil Mill & Fertilizer Co. v. United States

42 F.2d 331 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1930

In Maxwell v. Griswold, 10 How. 242, 256 , 13 L. … And in Parker v. Great Western Ry.

In re Government of Norway

172 F. Supp. 651 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1959

States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation, and the successors and assigns of any thereof, jointly and severally, they, the said Manss Steamship Corporation, and Harry V. … See Virginia Shipbuilding Corp. v. United States Shipping Board, 292 F. 440 (1923).

Cumberland Glass Mfg. Co. v. United States

44 F.2d 455 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1930

In Marigold Garden Co. v. Commissioner, 6 B. T. … See also Haugh & Keenan Storage So Transfer Co. v. Heiner [D. C.] 20 F.(2d) 921 .” The rule announced by the board in these cases is sustained by numerous decisions of the courts.

Finn v. United States

152 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1961

The Eeview Board affirmed the decision of the Eegional Office. … Bryant v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 460 , cert. denied 344 U.S. 913 ; Oroghan v. United States, 116 Ct. Cl. 577 , cert. denied 340 U.S. 854 .

Schwartz v. United States

16 Cl. Ct. 182 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1989

See Jensen v. Dept. of Trans., 858 F.2d 721 (Fed.Cir.1988). The issue was whether the Merit Systems Protection Board should pay an attorney fee award under the CSRA to the attorney or to the client. … On or about May 8,1987, Ron Brown sent a letter to plaintiff breaching the government’s agreement to send a joint payee check.

Alexander

546 F.2d 431 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 28, 1976

On timely appeal to the CSC’s Board of Appeals *369 and Review (BAR), that Board affirmed plaintiff’s RIF separation. “Plaintiff thereupon filed suit in this court seeking, back pay and attorneys’ fees and costs. … Wilmot v. United States, supra, at 682 ; Grover v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 337, 343 (1973); Morelli v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 848, 858 (1966); Keener v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 334, 339 (1964); Harrington v.

Elastic Stop Nut Corp. v. United States

113 F. Supp. 446 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1953

The Board of Awards of the St. … (Ru bin v. United States, 167 F 2d 113 , CCA 2d).

Wilco Floor Service, Inc. v. United States

197 Ct. Cl. 902 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972

Co. v. United States, 168 Ct. … Hoffer Oil Co. v.

Keltner v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 824 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1984

See Buchanan v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 291 , 621 F.2d 373 (1980). … pertain to selection boards or to continuation boards.

McCormack v. United States

496 F.2d 543 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1974

The Board’s ruling, being unsupported by the substantial evidence, cannot stand.' … See McGucken v. United States, 187 Ct.

Pine Products Corp. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,495 · United States Court of Claims · May 26, 1988

Bernitt v. Smith-Powers Logging Co., 184 F. 139, 143 (C.C.D.Or.1911); General Eng’g Corp. v. Virgin Islands Water, 636 F.Supp. 22, 39 (D.V.I.1985); Heinz v. … Adams Veneer Co. v. Lyng, No. 87-108 FR (D.Or. Nov. 9, 1987) [available on WEST-LAW, 1987 WL 46898 ].

John McShain, Inc. v. United States

412 F.2d 1281 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

However, the Board properly denied plaintiff’s appeal for relief on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter. See, United States v. … In view of the Board’s action, and by mutual consent of the parties, a trial was held here to determine fully all questions of liability and damages. See, Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v.

Coastal Corp. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,984 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1984

. §§ 601-613 (1982), and that the board therefore lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. Coastal Corp. v. United States, 713 F.2d 728 (Fed.Cir.1983). … A Source Evaluation Board (SEB) was established for this procurement.

Fred G. Clark Co. v. United States

71 Ct. Cl. 662 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1931

Under the decision in United States Bedding Co. v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 341 , affirmed 266 U. S. 491 , plaintiff is not entitled to recover. … The disposition of the claim by the Board of Contract Adjustment was not final before that board was dissolved and its functions transferred to the War Department Claims Board.

Thompson

650 F.2d 286 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1980

See, e.g., Monroe Garment Co. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 324 , 488 F.2d 989 (1973); Zidell Explorations, Inc. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 331, 334 , 427 F.2d 735, 737 (1970). … In General Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 214 Ct.

Monchamp Corp. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,833 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 27, 1990

The contracting officer denied the claim and plaintiff appealed to the United States Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals (the “Board”). … Coastal Corp. v.