Case law

Burke v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 853 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 26, 1982

Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 27, 34 , 515 F.2d 1397, 1401 (1975); Ricci v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 687, 693 , 507 F.2d 1390, 1393 (1974); Schlegal v. United States, 189 Ct. … Power v. United States, 209 Ct.

Maddux v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 193 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 2, 1885

In the case of John Conley v. … . *200 In the case of Francis M, Tanner, snrmving partner, &o., v.

Ryan v. United States

38 Ct. Cl. 143 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1903

Yankee in addition to his former duty, yet as the claimant lived on board the U. S. S. … Thomas v. United, States (ante, p. 113) and need not be further considered here. Petition dismissed.

Cresswell v. United States

173 F. Supp. 805 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1959

Co. v. New York Evening Post, 2 Cir., 256 F. 435, 441 ; Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. United States, 211 U.S. 176, 188 , 29 S.Ct. 77 , 53 L.Ed. 136 . … Minneapolis-Moline Co. v. United States, 149 F.Supp. 146 , 137 Ct. Cl. 790, 795 ; Union Paving Company v. United States, 115 F.Supp. 179 , 126 Ct. Cl. 478, 489 ; Sternbergh v.

McCord v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 849 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 23, 1982

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 24 , 310 F.2d 381, 395-96 (1962), cert. denied sub nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963). … See King v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 876 (1977).

Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States

74 F. Supp. 165 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1947

In accordance with Article 15 of the contract, they appealed to the *167 Secretary of War, who referred the appeal to the War Department Board of Contract Appeals. … Hirsch and Pernice Contracting Corporation v. United States, 104 C. Cl. 45, and Morris & Cumings Dredging Co., Inc., v. United States, 78 C.

In re the Reference of the Claim of Morrison

87 Ct. Cl. 606 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1938

A board of officers was thereupon appointed by competent authority to investigate and report upon his claim. … In Curran v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 26 , in construing this part of the statute, the court held that the woi’ds “connected therewith” meant in connection with the property so lost.

Hopkins v. United States

82 F. Supp. 1015 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1949

The Board decided that the transaction in which J. J. … Irwin v. Gavit, 268 U.S. 161 , 44 S.Ct. 475 , 69 L.Ed. 897 ; Brooks v. United States, 6 F.Supp. 844 , 79 Ct.Cl. 470 ; Regenold v. United States, 60 F.Supp. 765 , 104 Ct.Cl. 238 . The case of Burnet v.

Coastal Corp. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,984 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1984

. §§ 601-613 (1982), and that the board therefore lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. Coastal Corp. v. United States, 713 F.2d 728 (Fed.Cir.1983). … A Source Evaluation Board (SEB) was established for this procurement.

Green v. United States

7 Ct. Cl. 496 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1871

The law of South Carolina, at the time of the seizure of this property, was the common law ; and it had been declared by the case of Myers v. Griffts, (11 Rich. … In the English case of Brown v.

Costner v. United States

665 F.2d 1016 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 18, 1981

The commission’s Appeals Review Board (board) affirmed BRIOH in an opinion dated May 15, 1975, on the ground that plaintiff was never "appointed” to a position with the Federal Government within the meaning of5U.S.C. §2105 … There is substantial evidence to support the board’s decision that plaintiff was never appointed to a federal position during the period in dispute.

S.O.G. of Arkansas v. United States

546 F.2d 367 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1976

See, e.g., Space Corp. v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 1, 5-6 , 470 F. 2d 536, 538-39 (1972); Jamsar, Inc. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 819, 827 , 442 F. 2d 930, 934 (1971); Woodcrest Constr. Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 184 Ct. Cl. 1, 12-13 , 395 F. 2d 783, 789-90 (1968); Blount Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 478, 496 , 346 F. 2d 962, 972-73 (1965); Beacon Constr. Co. of Mass. v.

Hall v. District of Columbia

31 Ct. Cl. 376 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 22, 1896

In the case of Barnard, administrator, v. The District of Columbia (20 C. Cls. … (Barnard v. District of Columbia, 127 U. S., 409 .) In the case of Barnes v. District ( 22 C. Cls.

American Dredging Co.

23 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,971 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1977

of Contract Appeals (the board). … Miller, Inc. v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 292 , 422 F. 2d 1344 (1970), and Aircraft Associates & Mfg. Co. v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 886 , 357 F. 2d 373 (1966), and upon Rule 27 of the F.B.C.P.

Norris Industries, Inc.

214 Ct. Cl. 776 · United States Court of Claims · May 27, 1977

"Defendant requests prompt review under Rule 53(c)(3) of Trial Judge Browne’s order denying defendant discovery of certain of plaintiffs books and records. … V, 1965).

California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 774 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1986

NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … See, e.g., Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 807 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2374 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973); SEC v.

Town of Fallsburg v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 633 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 8, 1991

Virginia v. … Co. v.

Vasey v. United States

128 Ct. Cl. 754 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1954

Plaintiff then lodged a further appeal under section. 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act with the Board of Appeals and Beview of the Civil Service Commission, and on August 22, 1950, that board found in plaintiff’s favor … In our opinion it did. *757 This identical argument was made by defendant in the recent cases of Goodwin v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 417 , and Smith v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 706 . It was rejected in both.

Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States

292 F.2d 290 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

In Central Engineering and Construction Co. v. United States, 103 Ct. … If a Notice of Appeal is filed, it will be forwarded to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals and the Becorder of that Board will docket the appeal and will forward to you a copy of the Buies of the Board.

Keltner v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 824 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1984

See Buchanan v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 291 , 621 F.2d 373 (1980). … pertain to selection boards or to continuation boards.