Case law

Basch v. United States

52 Ct. Cl. 134 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 29, 1917

In Lamar v. Browne, 92 U. … In the meantime the suit of Lamar v. Browne, 92 U. S., 187 , had been brought, as also that of Lamar v. McCulloch,, 115 U. S., 163 .

Jovick v. United States

492 F.2d 1215 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1973

Brooks v. United States, supra. … The board is composed of three members appointed by the Director of Central Intelligence. The Office of Personnel administrative to the board. d. DEPUTY DIRECTORS.

Pierce v. United States

49 F. Supp. 324 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1943

In De Coppet v. Helvering, 108 F. 2d 187 (C. C. … The then Board of Tax Appeals, now the Tax Court of the United States, in Hagerman v. Commissioner, 34 B. T.

Rutstein v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 874 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1982

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 17-19 , 310 F.2d 381, 391-392 (1962), cert. denied sub nom., Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963). … Friedman v. United States, supra, 159 Ct. Cl. at 25 , 310 F.2d at 396 ; see Eurell v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 273 , 566 F.2d 1146 (1977).

Newbery Alaska, Inc. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,133 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1982

The record does not establish the requisite "meeting of the minds” for an implied-in-fact contract See Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592 (1923); Somali Development Bank v. United States, 205 Ct. … Plaintiffs petition is dismissed. 1 Pacific’s appeal before the DOT Contract Appe ils Board remains viable and our order herein does not necessarily determine whatever outcome may obtain in that case.

Aleman Food Services, Inc. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,199 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1991

According to the quotation provided by the plaintiff, ”[t]he authority of any agent must ordinarily be derived from the board of directors acting as a body.” 15 Tex Jur 3d § 254 (1981) (citing Scott v. … “But this authority need not necessarily be conferred by a precedent resolution of the board.” Id. (citing Aransas Pass Harbor Co. v. Manning, 94 Tex. 558, 562 , 63 S.W. 627, 629 (1901)).

Dravo-Groves v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,186 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1982

But see Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute v. United States, 677 F.2d 149 (1st Cir. 1982). The second is that defendant is improperly seeking actual rather than liquidated damages. … See generally Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 1048 , cert. denied, 459, U.S. 1086 (1982); Roubin & Janeiro, Inc. v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 580 (1981); Warwick Construction, Inc. v.

Bar Ray Products, Inc. v. United States

162 Ct. Cl. 836 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

Decision by this court was deferred pending action by the Supreme Court hi the case of United States v. Carlo Bianchi and Co., Inc., 373 U.S. 709 . The Supreme Court decided the Bianehi case on June 3, 1963. … The evidence taken before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals bears on disputed factual issues related to these contractual provisions.

Hazelhurst Oil Mill & Fertilizer Co. v. United States

42 F.2d 331 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1930

In Maxwell v. Griswold, 10 How. 242, 256 , 13 L. … And in Parker v. Great Western Ry.

Northern Pacific Railway Company, Transferee of Northwestern Improvement Company v. The United States

378 F.2d 686 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1967

See Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473, 476 , 60 S.Ct. 355 , 84 L.Ed. 406 (1940); Moline Properties, Inc. v. … See Jackson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 233 F.2d 289, 290-291 (C.A.2, 1956); Paymer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 150 F.2d 334, 337 (C.A.2, 1945); Dudley v.

Burke v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 853 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 26, 1982

Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 27, 34 , 515 F.2d 1397, 1401 (1975); Ricci v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 687, 693 , 507 F.2d 1390, 1393 (1974); Schlegal v. United States, 189 Ct. … Power v. United States, 209 Ct.

Maddux v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 193 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 2, 1885

In the case of John Conley v. … . *200 In the case of Francis M, Tanner, snrmving partner, &o., v.

Giglio v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 160 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1989

See Sanders v. United States Postal Service, 801 F.2d 1328, 1331 (Fed.Cir.1986); Hary v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 10, 17 , 618 F.2d 704, 707 (1980); Sanders v. … In military board matters, legal advise is often given ex parte to boards under conditions of privilege and without taint to the proceedings. See Weiss v. United States, 180 Ct.Cl. 863, 870-72 (1967).

Cresswell v. United States

173 F. Supp. 805 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1959

Co. v. New York Evening Post, 2 Cir., 256 F. 435, 441 ; Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. United States, 211 U.S. 176, 188 , 29 S.Ct. 77 , 53 L.Ed. 136 . … Minneapolis-Moline Co. v. United States, 149 F.Supp. 146 , 137 Ct. Cl. 790, 795 ; Union Paving Company v. United States, 115 F.Supp. 179 , 126 Ct. Cl. 478, 489 ; Sternbergh v.

Major Coat Co. v. United States

549 F.2d 196 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 4, 1977

As noted in Instrument Systems Corp. v. … Cf. observations of Cowen, Chief Judge, in Sandnes’ Sons, Inc. v.

McCord v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 849 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 23, 1982

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 24 , 310 F.2d 381, 395-96 (1962), cert. denied sub nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963). … See King v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 876 (1977).

Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States

74 F. Supp. 165 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1947

In accordance with Article 15 of the contract, they appealed to the *167 Secretary of War, who referred the appeal to the War Department Board of Contract Appeals. … Hirsch and Pernice Contracting Corporation v. United States, 104 C. Cl. 45, and Morris & Cumings Dredging Co., Inc., v. United States, 78 C.

Green v. United States

7 Ct. Cl. 496 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1871

The law of South Carolina, at the time of the seizure of this property, was the common law ; and it had been declared by the case of Myers v. Griffts, (11 Rich. … In the English case of Brown v.

Tilley v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 451 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1988

Gava v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 676, 679 n. 2 (1980). Park v. … Tilley’s application to the Board will not be counted for purposes of laches. See, Stephen H. Muse v.

Hopkins v. United States

82 F. Supp. 1015 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1949

The Board decided that the transaction in which J. J. … Irwin v. Gavit, 268 U.S. 161 , 44 S.Ct. 475 , 69 L.Ed. 897 ; Brooks v. United States, 6 F.Supp. 844 , 79 Ct.Cl. 470 ; Regenold v. United States, 60 F.Supp. 765 , 104 Ct.Cl. 238 . The case of Burnet v.