Case law

Birt v. United States

180 Ct. Cl. 910 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

Responding to a like contention in Grant v. United States, 162 Ct. … See Rowe v. United States, supra, 167 Ct. Cl. at 471-72 .

Luchs v. United States

6 F. Supp. 222 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

An appeal was taken to the Board of Tax Appeals by the Washington School of Art and on January 7, 1929, the decision of the Board sustained the ruling of the Commissioner. … Dorsheimer v. United States, 2 Ct. Cl. 103 , affirmed 7 Wall. 166 , 19 L. Ed. 187 ; Lone Star Brewing Association, 61 Ct. Cl. 118 .

Adams v. United States

46 Ct. Cl. 291 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 27, 1911

But in this case the court is without affirmative evidence that there was either an original or duplicate invoice on board at all. The presumption is great that there was no such paper on board the schooner. … Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U. S., 113 . It is true that some exceptions have been made as to the presence of papers. It has sometimes been held that mere lack of a paper does not warrant condemnation.

Davis v. United States

152 Ct. Cl. 805 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1961

Baer v. Commissioner, supra; McMurtry v. United States, supra; Bowers v. Commissioner, supra; Owens v. Commissioner, 273 F. 2d 251 (1959); Fisher v. United States, supra; and Patrick v. United States, 186 F. … Commissioner, supra; Richardson v. Commissioner, supra; Smith’s Estate v. Commissioner, supra; Donnelly v. Commissioner, supra; Estate of Walsh v. Commissioner, supra; Douglas v. Commissioner, supra.

Lewis C. McCarty Jr. v. The United States

437 F.2d 961 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

With the takeover of the V-loan by the Navy, Marine’s entire picture was drastically changed to the utmost disadvantage of the company”, according to the chairman of its board of directors. … Co. v.

A. L. Coupe Construction Co. v. United States

139 F. Supp. 61 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1956

Shepherd v. United States, 125 C. Cls. 724, 741 ; Bein v. United States, 101 C. Cls. 144 ; Eastern Contracting Company v. United States, 97 C. Cls. 341 ; P. J. Carlin Construction Company v. United States, 92 C. … Cls. 280 ; United States v. Cramp & Sons, 206 U. S. 118 ; Pelton Water Wheel Company v. United States, 55 C. Cls. 31 ; Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 712 ; and Eppes v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 645 .

K-W Construction, Inc. v. United States

671 F.2d 481 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 10, 1982

See, e.g., Sun Oil Co. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 716 , 572 F.2d 786 (1978). … Heyer Products Co. v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 63, 69 , 140 F. Supp. 409, 412-13 (1956). See also Morgan Business Associates, Inc. v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 325, 330 , 619 F.2d 892, 895 (1980).

Jovick v. United States

492 F.2d 1215 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1973

Brooks v. United States, supra. … The board is composed of three members appointed by the Director of Central Intelligence. The Office of Personnel administrative to the board. d. DEPUTY DIRECTORS.

Carroll v. United States

81 F. Supp. 268 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1948

Cls. 384 ; Thornley v. United States, 18 C. Cls. 111 ; Faust v. United States, 42 C. Cls. 94 ; Fulmer v. United States, 32 C. Cls. 112 ; Young v. United States, 19 C. Cls. 145 ; Yemans v. United States, 52 C. … Cls. 388, 395 ; Bowie v. United States, 45 C. Cls. 48 , and Byrd v. United States, 103 C. Cls. 285, 294 ), and found that all of these cases have no bearing upon the one before us.

Pierce v. United States

49 F. Supp. 324 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1943

In De Coppet v. Helvering, 108 F. 2d 187 (C. C. … The then Board of Tax Appeals, now the Tax Court of the United States, in Hagerman v. Commissioner, 34 B. T.

Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago v. The United States

403 F.2d 721 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1968

Louis Union Trust Co. v. Burnet, 59 F.2d 922 (C.A. 8, 1932); Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 50 F.2d 842 (C.A. 3, 1931); Michigan Trust Co. v. United States, 21 F.Supp. 482 (W.D. … People v. YMCA, 365 Ill. 118 , 6 N.E.2d 166 (1936) ; Turnverein “Lincoln” v. Board of Appeals, 358 Ill. 135 , 192 N.E. 780 (1934); People ex rel. Greer v.

Rhodes v. United States

156 Ct. Cl. 31 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1962

EMPLOYMENT REVIEW BOARD The Director may appoint an Employment Review Board to advise him concerning any particular case. ‡ ‡ Cases are legion holding that the Government, as an employer, has the right to terminate the employment … Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 ; Hoppe v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 559 , cert. denied 355 U.S. 816 ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 ; DeBusk v. United States, 132 Ct.

Jamsar, Inc. v. The United States

442 F.2d 930 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

If we are concerned with the latter in that case the decision of the Board would not be binding on this court and we must then pass on the merits of plaintiff’s claim. Beacon Construction Company of Massachusetts v. … But see, Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v.

Cuban-American Sugar Co. v. United States

27 F. Supp. 307 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1939

United States v. Andrews, 302 U. … Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co., 288 U. S. 502 ; Welch v. Obispo Oil Co., 301 U. S. 190 ; Central Iron & Steel Co. v. United States, 79 C. Cls. 56 ; Bradford & Co. v. United States, 79 C.

Jones Mercantile Co. v. United States

8 F. Supp. 700 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1934

Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409 , 51 S. Ct. 186 , 75 L. Ed. 415 . … We think the record in this ease shows that plaintiff received sufficient notice for the purpose of an appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals under the accepted practice at that time. Roy & Titcomb, Inc., v.

Rutstein v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 874 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1982

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 17-19 , 310 F.2d 381, 391-392 (1962), cert. denied sub nom., Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963). … Friedman v. United States, supra, 159 Ct. Cl. at 25 , 310 F.2d at 396 ; see Eurell v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 273 , 566 F.2d 1146 (1977).

Joseph Swaaley v. The United States

376 F.2d 857 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1967

Keyishian v. Board of Regents of the University of The State of New York, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967), and cases cited. Wieman v. … In Engelhardt v.

Fickett v. United States

149 Ct. Cl. 697 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1960

Pie cites this court’s opinions in Price v. United States, Waterbury v. United States, and Presson v. United States, reported in volume 121 Ct. Cl. at pages 664, 687, and 695, respectively. … Officers and men showed zeal and aptitude for the service and the conduct of the men while on board was excellent. 1907 Annual cruise of the Naval Militia Aug. 20, to Aug. 28, 1907 on board the U. 8. S. Prairie.

Anderson v. United States

97 Ct. Cl. 545 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1942

Brown, Speers, Eq. 38, 41, (quoted and referred to approvingly in the opinion in Aetna L. Ins. Co. v. … Slade v. Van Vechten, 11 Paige 21 ; Cole v. Malcolm, 66 N. Y. 366 ; Sanford v. McLean, 3 Paige, 117 ; Atlantic Ins. Co. v. Storrow, 5 Paige, 285 ; Graham v. Dickinson, 3 Barb. Ch. 169 ; Ellsworth v. Lockwood, 42 N.

Bar Ray Products, Inc. v. United States

162 Ct. Cl. 836 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

Decision by this court was deferred pending action by the Supreme Court hi the case of United States v. Carlo Bianchi and Co., Inc., 373 U.S. 709 . The Supreme Court decided the Bianehi case on June 3, 1963. … The evidence taken before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals bears on disputed factual issues related to these contractual provisions.