Case law

Lord

227 Ct. Cl. 692 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 24, 1981

Harper v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 135 , 310 F.2d 405 (1962); Walters v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 215, 224-28 , 358 F.2d 957, 962-64 (1966); Farrar v. United States, 173 Ct. … If the Board relies, on remand, upon the standards set forth in the directive issued by the Secretary of Defense in January 1973 (discussed above and in Davidson v.

Z.A.N. Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,875 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 5, 1984

See Ruhnau-Evans-Ruhnau Assoc. v. … Co., Inc. v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 384 (1983).

Arlington Trust Co. v. United States

139 F. Supp. 556 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1956

United States v. Leyde & Leyde, 89 F. Supp. 256 . … United States v. Leyde & Leyde, 89 F. Supp. 256 .

Empire Institute of Tailoring, Inc. v. United States

161 F. Supp. 409 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1958

Levine v. United States, 137 F.Supp. 955 , 133 Ct.Cl. 774 ; Sese v. United States, 113 F.Supp. 658 , 125 Ct.Cl. 526 ; Gray v. United States, 124 Ct.Cl. 313 ; Reliance Motors, Inc., v. … Girault v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 521 , 133 Ct.Cl. 135 ; Mistretta v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 264 , 128 Ct.Cl. 41 ; Nassif v. United States, 125 Ct.Cl. 379 ; Thomas v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 76 ; Gray v.

Stovel v. United States

36 Ct. Cl. 392 · United States Court of Claims · May 20, 1901

incident to the destruction of the -Spanish fleet in Manila Bay on May 1, 1898, and the court is asked to instruct the Auditor as to the right of the claimant to participate in that bounty, In the case of Admiral Dewey v. … It was held in the case of Sampson v. The United States (ante, 194) that the order made in said case was subject to change until a full disposition of the matter.

Railroad Concrete Crosstie Corp. v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 781 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1984

Subsequently, the General Counsel reaffirmed and further explained this determination, whereupon plaintiff appealed the General Counsel’s decision to the Railroad Retirement Board (the “Board”). … The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the Board’s decision, Railroad Concrete Crosstie Corp. v.

Continental Ore Corporation v. The United States

423 F.2d 1248 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

Credit Corporation (hereinafter “the Board”). 1 The Board, after considering the nature of war risk surcharges, denied plaintiff's appeal. … In the case of Tsakiroglou & Co., Ltd. v.

Kirby v. United States

201 Ct. Cl. 527 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

Following the discharge, plaintiff Kirby eventually applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board, seeking to have it remove the bar to his future enlistment and to have the board change the nature of his discharge. … In Gearinger v.

DeBarros v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,614 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1984

Thereafter, plaintiff appealed to the Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals (AGBCA). … or tort was outside the Board’s jurisdiction.”

Hadlock v. United States

159 Ct. Cl. 52 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1962

Plaintiff also cites Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 . We can see no-relevancy in this situation. … Collins v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 382 , 386 and Bryan v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 541, 547 . Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and defendant’s cross-motion is granted.

Overall Roofing & Construction Inc. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,849 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1990

The final decision also contained the requisite language that it was final unless appealed within 90 days to the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals, or within one year to this court. … Corp. v. United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 , 178 Ct.Cl. 599 (Fed.Cir.1967); Ralcon, Inc. v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 294, 299-300 (1987); Citizens Assocs., Ltd. v.

Woog v. United States

48 Ct. Cl. 80 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1913

.” *89 In United States v. … Hyde v. Shine, 199 U. S., 81 ; United States v. Keitel, 211 U. S., 394 ; Curley v. United States, 130 Fed. Rep., 1; Mc- *90 Gregor v. United States, 184 Fed. Rep., 195; Haas v. Henkel, supra. In United States v.

Wolverine Supply, Inc. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,676 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1989

Co. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 1, 7 , 314 F.2d 501 , 504 (1963). . … Co. v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 862, 865 (1982); Singleton v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 156, 165 (1984). cf. Emeco Indus., Inc. v.

Luchs v. United States

6 F. Supp. 222 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

An appeal was taken to the Board of Tax Appeals by the Washington School of Art and on January 7, 1929, the decision of the Board sustained the ruling of the Commissioner. … Dorsheimer v. United States, 2 Ct. Cl. 103 , affirmed 7 Wall. 166 , 19 L. Ed. 187 ; Lone Star Brewing Association, 61 Ct. Cl. 118 .

Adams v. United States

46 Ct. Cl. 291 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 27, 1911

But in this case the court is without affirmative evidence that there was either an original or duplicate invoice on board at all. The presumption is great that there was no such paper on board the schooner. … Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U. S., 113 . It is true that some exceptions have been made as to the presence of papers. It has sometimes been held that mere lack of a paper does not warrant condemnation.

Davis v. United States

152 Ct. Cl. 805 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1961

Baer v. Commissioner, supra; McMurtry v. United States, supra; Bowers v. Commissioner, supra; Owens v. Commissioner, 273 F. 2d 251 (1959); Fisher v. United States, supra; and Patrick v. United States, 186 F. … Commissioner, supra; Richardson v. Commissioner, supra; Smith’s Estate v. Commissioner, supra; Donnelly v. Commissioner, supra; Estate of Walsh v. Commissioner, supra; Douglas v. Commissioner, supra.

Rieth v. United States

462 F.2d 530 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1972

Mross v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 165, 169 (1968). … Lawler v. United States, 169 Ct.Cl. 644 (1965), finding 27.

Germain School of Photography, Inc. v. United States

150 Ct. Cl. 841 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1960

837 and V-899. … The Board held that a fair and reasonable rate for contract V-837 was $0,497 per student hour and $0,523 per student hour for contract V-899.

Telephone Directory Advertising Co. v. United States

142 F. Supp. 884 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Lucas v. Earl, 281 U. S. 111 ; Burnet v. Leininger, 285 U. S. 136 ; Helvering v. Horst, 311 U. S. 112 ; Helvering v. Eubank, 311 U. S. 122 ; Harrison v. Schaffner, 312 U. S. 579 ; Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U. S. 591 . … Tingar, Inc. et al. v. Commissioner, 26 T. C.

Universal Fiberglass Corp. v. United States

537 F.2d 400 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

Co. v. United States, 84 Ct. Cl. 570 (1937)), elsewhere in the Federal court system (J. W. Bateson Co. v. … Supp. 437 (1946), and General Elevator Co v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl 467 (1952).