Case law

Boyce v. United States

21 F. Supp. 274 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1937

Connor v. United States, 13 F.Supp. 455, 460 , 82 Ct.Cl. 476 , and Savannah Bank & Trust Company v. United States, 58 F.2d 1068 , 75 Ct.Cl. 245 . … In the case of Connor v.

Tulia Feedlot, Inc. v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 364 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 9, 1983

However, at the regular meeting of the corporation’s Board of Directors held on July 14, 1970, the board voted to obtain an additional guaranty of $25,000 from each of the previous guarantors, and to pay each guarantor annually … Rubber Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner, 335 F.2d 75, 78 (6th Cir. 1964).

In re Judicial Misconduct

2 Cl. Ct. 255 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1983

Cole and possibly other plaintiffs in Baskett v. … See Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 765-66 , 100 S.Ct. 2455, 2463-64 , 65 L.Ed.2d 488 (1980); Flaksa v.

Vance v. United States

30 Ct. Cl. 252 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 1, 1895

(Hamilton v. Dillin, 21 Wall. R., 73.) The capture was made by a military expedition in hostile territory, and was a lawful capture. (Young v. United States, 97 U. S. R., 39 .) … In this instance the military board was without jurisdiction to try the question of the claimants’ loyalty or to establish their ownership in the property or to determine their right to it or its proceeds.

Leopold v. United States

18 Ct. Cl. 546 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1883

of the Naval Academy; the assignment to the various corps to be made by the Secretary of the Navy, upon the recommendation of the Academic Board. … (United States v. Freeman, 3 How., 556 .) In arriving at the meaning of the law, the words “at the Academy,” following “undergraduates,” should not be overlooked.

Ardmore Construction Co. v. United States

138 F. Supp. 276 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

board or of a division shall be deemed to be the decision of the board or of a division, as the case may be. … Loading and v/nloading cars. — Tlie contractor shall load promptly all railroad cars furnished for loading upon his order and shall unload from railroad cars promptly upon arrival all shipments consigned to him, and shall

Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United States

396 F.2d 977 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968

The AEC lias established a Board of Contract Appeals (10 C.E.R. Part 3 (1968)). … Corp. v.

Elmhirst v. United States

38 F.2d 915 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1930

of the board, Appeal of Straight, 7 B. … R. 1305, Goodrich v., Edwards, and Walsh v. Brewster, supra, were all handed down on the same day and written by Mr. Justice Clarke. In the ease of Walsh v.

Alpert v. United States

161 Ct. Cl. 810 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1963

Plaintiff appealed this order to the Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board, Department of Labor. … Bailey v. United States, supra; J ones v. Summerfield, supra; Evans v. Leedom, sufra; Grasse v. Snyder, supra; Arant v. Lane, sufra; Benson v. Zahner, 289 F. 2d 756 (D.C.

Honeywell, Inc. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,611 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1989

Keco Indus., Inc. v. United States, 192 Ct.Cl. 773, 784 , 428 F.2d 1233, 1237 (1970); Heyer Prod. Co. Inc. v. United States, 135 Ct.Cl. 63, 69 , 140 F.Supp. 409, 413 (1956); Paxson Elec. Co. Inc. v. … The Chairman of the Board will be one of the five members. Three of the Board members will be appointed by Hazeltine, including the Chairman, and two by Tadiran.

Terminal Construction Corp. v. United States

171 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

Miller, Inc. v. United States, supra note 1; Carol D. Heers v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 294 (1964). … Co. v. United States, supra.

Gilbane Building Co. v. United States

166 Ct. Cl. 347 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964

Crook Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 254 U.S. 83, 86 ; Chouteau v. United States, supra [ 95 U.S. 61 (1877)]; cf. United States v. Smith, 94 U.S. 214, 217 .

Benevento v. United States

461 F.2d 1316 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

Daniels v. United States, supra; Ayres v. United States, supra; Abbott v. … V, 1965-69).

Coastal Cargo Company, Inc. v. The United States

351 F.2d 1004 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1965

See also Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, 325 F.2d 446 , 163 Ct.Cl. 465, 472 (1963); Nesbitt v. United States, supra footnote 6. … Brown & Son Electric Co. v. United States, supra, 325 F.2d at 450, 163 Ct.Cl. at 472. Cf. Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v. United States, 337 F.2d 861 , 162 Ct.Cl. 802, 808 (1963).

Public Water Supply District No. 3 v. United States

135 F. Supp. 887 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1955

The plaintiff relies on the case of United States v. State of Alabama, 313 U. S. 274 , to support its position that a lien came into existence when the bonds were issued. … In Missouri tie County Court is the equivalent of the board of county commissioners or a board of supervisors. Its functions are legislative and administrative rather than judicial.

National Cored Forgings Co. v. United States

132 F. Supp. 454 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

The *457 claims were denied whereupon they were appealed to the Appeal Board of the Office of Contract Settlement. … Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation and the United States, supra; Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation, supra; Reconstruction Finance Corporation v.

Pardo v. United States

648 F.2d 1330 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1981

In April 1976, plaintiff appealed to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). … In its cross-motion, the Government invokes United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), in arguing that this court is without jurisdiction.

Williamson Heater Co. v. United States

58 Ct. Cl. 63 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 29, 1923

On appeal to the Secretary of War the decision of the board was affirmed. ■ The record presented to the court, whatever it may have been before the board, unfolds the following uncontradicted situation: In September, 1918 … Graves v. Hepke, 2 B. & A. 131. The case seems to us to fall clearly within the terms and intent of the Dent Act.

Husky Oil NPR Operations, Inc. v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,090 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1985

United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 397 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 952 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 3 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); United States v. … Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 , 61 S.Ct. 767, 770 , 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941); Eastport Steamship Corp. v.

Fred A. Arnold, Inc. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,146 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 6, 1991

II In S & E Contractors, Inc. v. … Co. v.