Case law

Coggeshall Development Corp. v. United States

23 Cl. Ct. 739 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 22, 1991

They requested the Portsmouth Planning Board to zone a portion of the property for residential use. 3 The Planning Board invited the Navy to comment on the proposal. 4 The Navy informed the Planning Board that it imposed … The Planning Board was not authorized to approve zoning requests. Rather, the Board compiled information on the request and reported to the Portsmouth Town Council.

Straughan v. United States

1 Ct. Cl. 324 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1865

(Pitman v. Hooper, 3 Sum., p. 50.) … J., (Wetmore v. Henshaw, 12 J.

American-Hawaiian S. S. Co. v. United States

46 F.2d 592 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1931

It is possible that this did not authorize the board to determine what constituted a “taxable year,” but it is quite clear what the board understood it to mean and it promulgated the following regulation with reference to … In Swift & Co. v. United States, 38 F. (2d) 365, 372, 69 Ct.

Woog v. United States

48 Ct. Cl. 80 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1913

.” *89 In United States v. … Hyde v. Shine, 199 U. S., 81 ; United States v. Keitel, 211 U. S., 394 ; Curley v. United States, 130 Fed. Rep., 1; Mc- *90 Gregor v. United States, 184 Fed. Rep., 195; Haas v. Henkel, supra. In United States v.

McCarron v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 582 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 2, 1987

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. … United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166, 179 , 101 S.Ct. 453, 461 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980).

Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 946 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 13, 1992

In Huston v. … See Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. United States, 331 U.S. 132, 136 , 67 S.Ct. 1168, 1170 , 91 L.Ed. 1391 (1947). As long as two members of the Board concur, the decision is viable under Board regulations. See Arens v.

Murphy v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 670 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1928

He was not examined or recommended for this appointment by a board of three naval officers nor by a board of medical officers, as required by the act of August 29, 1916 ( 39 Stat. 556 , 587, 588). … See also Kearney v. United States, D-804, this day decided (post, p. 683). The petition should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

18 F. Supp. 229 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1937

Over a decade ago, the United States Board of Tax Appeals in the case of Charles N. Manning et al. v. … This ruling has been followed consistently by the Board since that time. This same question has been considered on many occasions by the Circuit Courts of Appeal, and in the leading case of Anahma Realty Corporation v.

Puglisi v. United States

564 F.2d 403 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1977

See Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory, supra; Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, supra; Dandridge v. Williams, supra. … North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder’s Drug Stores, Inc., 414 U.S. 156, 167 (1973).

Decca Ltd. v. United States

544 F.2d 1070 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1976

Co. v. United States, 99 Ct. Cl. 1 (1942), affirmed in part, vacated in part, 320 U.S. 1 (1943), order on remand, 100 Ct. Cl. 566 (1943), this court followed Gardiner v. Howe , which it deemed, with Brown v. … This analysis agrees with that of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences. Rosen v.

Telephone Directory Advertising Co. v. United States

142 F. Supp. 884 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Lucas v. Earl, 281 U. S. 111 ; Burnet v. Leininger, 285 U. S. 136 ; Helvering v. Horst, 311 U. S. 112 ; Helvering v. Eubank, 311 U. S. 122 ; Harrison v. Schaffner, 312 U. S. 579 ; Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U. S. 591 . … Tingar, Inc. et al. v. Commissioner, 26 T. C.

AMCO Electric v. United States

493 F.2d 647 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1974

Co. v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 37 , 458 F. 2d 49 (1972). … Plaintiff relies heavily on Greenland Contractors v.

Shaller v. United States

202 Ct. Cl. 571 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1973

This Board is the final board of review on incentive award recommendations for employees of the Navy. b. … Martilla v. United States, 118 Ct. Cl. 177 (1950); Kempinski v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 451 (1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 981 ; Serbin v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 934 (1964). 35.

Ardmore Construction Co. v. United States

138 F. Supp. 276 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

board or of a division shall be deemed to be the decision of the board or of a division, as the case may be. … Loading and v/nloading cars. — Tlie contractor shall load promptly all railroad cars furnished for loading upon his order and shall unload from railroad cars promptly upon arrival all shipments consigned to him, and shall

Boyce v. United States

21 F. Supp. 274 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1937

Connor v. United States, 13 F.Supp. 455, 460 , 82 Ct.Cl. 476 , and Savannah Bank & Trust Company v. United States, 58 F.2d 1068 , 75 Ct.Cl. 245 . … In the case of Connor v.

Goodley v. United States

441 F.2d 1175 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

His application was denied by the Correction Board on December 1, 1969, and he brought this suit to recover retired pay from November 1, 1968. … As this court said in Abbott v. United States, 152 Ct.

Stromfeld

546 F.2d 431 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 28, 1976

Weslowski v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 682, 692 (1966); Rae v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 160, 170 (1962). … Unterberg v. *379 United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 994 , 412 F. 2d 1341 (1969); Ward v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 210 (1967); Furlong v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 557 (1961).

Gratehouse v. United States

512 F.2d 1104 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

HUD promptly appealed the foregoing decision to the CSC’s Board of Appeals and Review (BAR). … Plaintiff’s resignation, the board stated, “properly became effective on September 4, 1971.”

Fred A. Arnold, Inc. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,146 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 6, 1991

II In S & E Contractors, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Brown

618 F.2d 125 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1979

proceedings here on defendant’s counterclaim against plaintiff were suspended pending the conclusion of a federal district court case in the state of *492 Washington involving the same parties and issues (United States v. … Brown, Civil Action No. 146-73C2) wherein on August 6, 1979, a judgment was entered in favor of the United States against Horton J. Brown and others, which decision is currently on appeal.