Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

2.56s

  • Kirby v. United States

    155 F. Supp. 240 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 9, 1957

    In Parks v. United States, 137 C. … In this regard, see Norden v. Royall, 90 F. Supp. 834 (D.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Joseph J. Holman, Jr. v. The United States

    383 F.2d 411 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1967

    On February 13, 1964, he appealed the Regional Office decision to the United States Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals arid Review. … Prater v. United States, supra, 172 Ct.Cl. at 615 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Kenneth Reed Construction Corp. v. United States

    475 F.2d 583 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1973

    Co. v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 374 , 351 F. 2d 987 (1965); W. H. Edwards Eng'r Corp. v. United States, 161 Ct. … WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 1 , 323 F. 2d 874 (1963); Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States, 109 Ct. Cl. 390 (1947).

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Penn Yan Agway Cooperative, Inc. v. The United States

    417 F.2d 1372 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1969

    Wiggin Terminals, Inc. v. … Central Cooperative v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Lezin v. United States

    98 F. Supp. 574 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 9, 1951

    Elchibegoff v. United States, 106 C. Cls. 541 ; Wittner v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 231 ; Simon v. United States, 113 C. Cls. 182 . … The Civil Service Commission reviewed the case and concurred in the decision of the Loyalty Review Board panel. Thereupon the Navy Department reinstated the plaintiff on March 8,1949.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Descon System Ltd. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,989 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1984

    R-D Mounts, Inc. v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 320, 323 (1983); William Green Construction Co. v. … Cofan Associates, Inc. v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 85 (1983); Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 146 , 655 F.2d 1047 (1981); D.R. Smalley & Sons v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Harold H. Gearinger, as of the Estate of Royal Barry Shaw v. The United States

    412 F.2d 862 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

    If the Air Force Correction Board, in a proper case, can do this, perhaps the Navy Correction Board could accomplish a similar action. … Plaintiff seeks, in addition, the costs of Shaw’s previous proceeding before the Navy Correction Board but that expense is not allowable. See Middleton v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 786 (1966).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Miracle Contractors, Inc. v. United States

    229 Ct. Cl. 786 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1982

    See Jenkins v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 710 (1980). … However, the GSA Board of Contract Appeals (board) rejected plaintiffs’ position and continued the suspensions.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Huntzinger v. United States

    9 Cl. Ct. 90 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1985

    The board, after considering his application and record, transferred Mr. … The Court of Claims has long held that resort to permissive administrative procedures such as a petition to a corrections board does not toll the statute. Bonen v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Airco, Inc. v. United States

    557 F.2d 237 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 15, 1977

    V. 1975), as amended by Pub. L. 92-415, we now have authority to correct records, as an incident to monetary relief, and we have always exercised power to reform contracts in connection with money claims, Chernick v. … The Board unfortunately did not specify what would justify deviating from the general rule. We must try to reason as it would have.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • T. C. Bateson Construction Co. v. United States

    319 F.2d 135 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1963

    No representative of a union testified at the hearings before the Engineers Board or this Board, and it is doubtful that any of the witnesses could be considered friendly to the unions. … Fuller Co. v. United States, 108 Ct.Cl. 70, 94 ; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, sections 295, 315; Williston on Contracts, sections 677, 1318; Chalender v. United States, 127 Ct. Cl. 557, 563 ; The Kehm Corp. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United States

    66 Ct. Cl. 230 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1928

    See Metal Products Co. v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 997, 1013 ; Douglas Traction & Light Co. v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 268 ; District of Columbia v. Gallaher, 124 U. S. 505 . … Bliss Co. v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 777 , was one in which the plaintiff sought to recover on account of increased cost in wages caused by acts of the Government.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Trone v. United States

    230 Ct. Cl. 904 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1982

    We hold that this case is controlled by our opinion in Barber v. United States, ante at 287, 676 F.2d 651 , and, therefore, plaintiff is entitled to relief. Plaintiff is the widow of Frederick W. … Plaintiff raised this claim before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (board) on March 12, 1979.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Spinks v. United States

    4 Cl. Ct. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1984

    V 1981) (the “EAJA”), and RUSCC 81(e). … V 1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MacCallum v. United States

    142 F. Supp. 925 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

    . *926 The plaintiff was employed in the Munitions Board, Office of the Secretary of Defense, as an Industrial Specialist (Controls Methods), in position No. 1600-1-156-12, Munitions Board, Office of Priorities and Controls … See Ciaffone v. United States, 126 Ct.Cl. 532, 537 . The defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition is granted, and the petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clark v. United States

    145 Ct. Cl. 374 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1959

    Plaintiff took an appeal to the Board of Grievance Review. … Prosterman v. United States, 144 C. Cls. 692 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United States

    165 Ct. Cl. 217 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 13, 1964

    Smith Courtney Co. v. United States, 46 Ct. Cl. 262, 265-266 (1911); Cannon v. United States, 137 Ct. Cl. 104, 107 (1956), 146 F. Supp. 827, 829 . … American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board, 133 F. Supp. 100, 103 (D.D.C., 1955), aff’d per curiam, 235 F. 2d 18 (C.A.D.C., 1956).

    Cited 111 timesPublished
  • Cowhig

    652 F.2d 69 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 27, 1981

    He now seeks to have that discharge declared null and void and requests that this court remand the action to the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records and direct the board to expunge his records. … Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct.Cl. 527, 531 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • L. Balkin Builder, Inc. v. United States

    142 F. Supp. 597 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

    As was stated in Holton, Seelye & Company v. United States, 106 C. … Joplin et al. v. United States, 89 C. Cls. 345, 356 ; Pennsylvania Coal and Coke Corporation v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 236, 247 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Newman v. United States

    143 Ct. Cl. 784 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1958

    The hearing was actually held on February 26,27, and March 4, 1946, before a three-member board. … Adler v. United States, 129 C. Cls. 150 ; Kirby v. United States, 140 C. Cls. 92 . The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.