Case law

Rupley v. United States

124 Ct. Cl. 59 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

Co. v. United *63 States, 186 U. S. 279 . However, that is not the important phase of this case. No doubt the estimate was in good faith and seemed reasonable at the time it was made. … feet of ponderosa pine ($5 per M), 2,300 M board feet of sugar pine ($6 per M), 2,300 M board feet of Douglas fir ($3 per M), and 700 M board feet of incense cedar ($3 per M); (3) that, if declared the successful bidder,

Ellis v. United States

610 F.2d 760 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979

See generally, Poschl v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 672 (1975); Morelli v. United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 848 (1966); Davis, Administrative Law § 30.05 (1972). Cf. Udall v. Tollman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 (1965). … Co. v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 649 , 428 F.2d 1241 (1970); Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 599 , 372 F.2d 1002 (1967); 28 U.S.C. § 1491 . See Williamson v. United States, 166 Ct.

Upton v. United States

131 F. Supp. 518 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

The Civil Service Commission’s Board of Appeals and Review affirmed the decision of the Fourth United States Civil Service Region. … Riley v. United States, 126 F. Supp. 214 . The plaintiff claims the facts in this case bring it within the purview of our decision in Goodwin v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 417 . We do not think so.

Ayres v. United States

186 Ct. Cl. 350 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

Wage board employees are not entitled to be paid for periods set aside for eating purposes, provided that this non-compensated time meets the standard succinctly stated in Bantom v. United States, 165 Ct. … Abbott v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 459, 463 , 151 F. Supp. 929, 932 (1957).

White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,054 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 24, 1981

It provides: Judicial review of board decisions — Actions in United States Court of Claims; district court actions; time for filing (a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), and in lieu of appealing the decision of the … of the receipt by the contractor of the decision of the contracting officer concerning the claim, and shall proceed de novo in accordance with the rules of the appropriate court. *629 As we said in Paragon Energy Corp. v.

Van Wagenen v. United States

31 Ct. Cl. 175 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 24, 1896

Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 398 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1988

Therefore, according to defendant, since both Hamilton and H.P.I. equally controlled one member of the board and the third board member was controlled by neither, Hamilton, in fact, shared equal power over the board with … power in electing Hermes’ board members.

Eastman v. United States

635 F.2d 833 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1980

Compare Deerman v. Commissioner, 43 T.C.M. (P-H) ¶ 74,084 at 411-12 (1974); Pennington v. Commissioner, 36 T.C.M. (P-H) ¶ 67,111 at 567 (1967). … Compare Coe v. Commissioner, 43 T.C.M. (P-H) ¶ 74,129 at 555-56, 557 (1974); Farris v. Commissioner, 41 T.C.M. (P-H) ¶ 72,165 at 862(1972).

The Martin Lane Company, Inc. v. The United States

432 F.2d 1013 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1970

Sturm v. United States, supra; Paschen Contractors, Inc. v. United States, supra. … Embassy Moving & Storage Co. v. United States, supra; Hol-Gar Mfg. Corp. v. United States, supra.

Leslie D. Jamerson v. The United States

401 F.2d 808 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1968

This is not a case like Field v. … Plaintiff reads Grahl v.

Werner v. United States

642 F.2d 404 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1981

Beckham v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 628 , 392 F.2d 619 (1968). See also Smith v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 545, 552-53 (1964). Loral Elects. Corp. v. United States, 181 Ct. … Cl. 822, 832 , 387 F.2d 975, 980 (1967), cited in Beckham v. United States, supra note 8, 183 Ct. Cl. at 636 , 392 F.2d at 623 . Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393 (1961). Id. at 401-02 . Id. at 40-04. Borys v.

Prater v. United States

172 Ct. Cl. 608 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

Following timely appeal, the Board of Appeals and Review of the U.S. … Horn v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 234 , 177 F. Supp. 438 (1959); Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 (1959).

Gager v. United States

126 F. Supp. 181 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1954

With the permission of the Joint Purchasing Board, Mr. … After V-J Day in 1945, the buildings, redesigned, where necessary, to meet building codes, were sold to private industry, farmers, etc., at considerably higher prices.

Wales v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 580 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 30, 1988

Fairchild v. Lehman, 814 F.2d 1555, 1557 (Fed.Cir.1987) (review of board decision challenging Article 15 proceeding); Varn v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 391, 394 (1987) (same). … The clemency request was not before the ABCMR, but the Gunn statement appears in the record before the board. . But see United States v.

Shepherd v. United States

113 F. Supp. 648 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1953

Bein v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 144 ; Eastern Contracting Co. v. United *657 States, 97 Ct.Cl. 341 ; P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. United States, 92 Ct.Cl. 280 . … Ackerlind v. United States, 240 U.S. 531 , 36 S.Ct. 438 , 60 L.Ed. 783 ; Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v.

Prefab Products, Inc. v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,378 · United States Court of Claims · May 9, 1986

Arlington Alliance, Ltd. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 347, 357-58 , 685 F.2d 1353, 1359 (1982); W.H. Moseley Co. v. … Thoen v. United States, 765 F.2d 1110, 1116 (Fed.Cir.1985); W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1336, 1338 (Fed.Cir.1983); Ske lly & Loy v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 370, 372 , 685 F.2d 414, 416 (1982); W.H.

Shane v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 294 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 18, 1983

Brown of the Bank of Nevada stating that Parcel One was located in an area of significant noise and therefore was ineligible for FHA insurance and referred Mr. Brown to Mr. Nicholas G. … Brown and *302 stated that the Air Force had no objections at all to residential development on the Parcel One property. Subsequently, on June 2, 1972, Mr. Brown wrote to Mr. Gris-wold at HUD, enclosing a copy of Col.

Miracle Contractors, Inc. v. United States

229 Ct. Cl. 786 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1982

See Jenkins v. United States, 224 Ct.Cl. 710 (1980). … However, the GSA Board of Contract Appeals (board) rejected plaintiffs’ position and continued the suspensions.

Sharp

521 F.2d 1406 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1975

However, she did nothing in her own behalf *976 until Marcli 14, 1974, when she applied to the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Becords. On November 4,1974, the Board denied her application. … These cases are Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) and Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 (1974). However, these oases can be distinguished.

Blum v. United States

231 Ct. Cl. 739 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1982

See Harris v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 762 ; Woodward v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 769 (1976) (order). But see Ray v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 1 , 453 F.2d 754 (1972). … DeCicco v.