Case law

Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

79 Ct. Cl. 25 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

The contract in this case in its pertinent provisions is identical with the contract which is the subject of suit in Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. … Co. v.

Myerle v. United States

31 Ct. Cl. 105 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1896

(Dubois v. Del. and H. Canal, 4 Wend., 285 ; Allamon v. The Mayor, etc., 43 Barbour, 33; Bendemagle v. Codes, 19 Wend., 207 ; Badger v. Libcombe, 15 Pick., 409 .) … Again (in Shaw v.

MacDougald Construction Co. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 210 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1952

Cls. 256, 283, 284 ; Callahan Construction Co. v. United States, 91 C. Cls. 538, 632-635 . … See Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 504 , cert. den. March 10, 1952.

Laurens L. Delano v. The United States

393 F.2d 517 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1968

Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1, 11 , 85 S.Ct. 1271 , 14 L.Ed.2d 179 (1965); Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 15 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); and Ganse v. United States, 376 F.2d 900, 904 , 180 Ct.Cl. 183, 189 (1967). … See Zemel v. Rusk, supra, and Udall v. Tallman, supra.

Page-River-Curran v. United States

574 F.2d 1063 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1978

In Camel Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 460 , 572 F. 2d 280 (1978), we rejected as not binding on us a Board ruling to the contrary. In agreement are Major Coat Co. v. United States, 211 Ct. … Withal, the Board has at least some expertise and experience. Its after-renegotiation profit allowances are legitimate data for use in determination of reasonable levels of profit (Major Coat Co. v.

Villier v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 341 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 29, 1989

In Bivens v. … Shiflett v.

Ayres v. United States

186 Ct. Cl. 350 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

Wage board employees are not entitled to be paid for periods set aside for eating purposes, provided that this non-compensated time meets the standard succinctly stated in Bantom v. United States, 165 Ct. … Abbott v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 459, 463 , 151 F. Supp. 929, 932 (1957).

Gove v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 296 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 30, 1991

In Austin v. … Williams v.

H & H Manufacturing Co. v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 873 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

See Lester Brothers, Inc. v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 536 (1960); Thomas E. Zoda v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 49 , 180 F. … American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United States, 259 U.S. 75 (1920).

Looney v. District of Columbia

19 Ct. Cl. 230 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1884

In this cáse the claimant makes another point: That he was directed by the treasurer of the Board of Public Works to sell his interest-bearing securities. … The power of the Court of Claims to give judgment against a claimant upon a counter-claim under those provisions was authoritatively settled by the Supreme Court in the case of McElrath v. The United States ( 102 U. S.

W. H. Moseley Co. v. United States

677 F.2d 850 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 21, 1982

Lehman, Inc. v. … Lehman, Inc. v. United States, ante at 11. 41 U.S.C. § 605 (c)(1) (Supp. III 1979). Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United States, ante at 11.

Simons v. United States

92 Ct. Cl. 132 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1940

We have heretofore held in dependent mother cases, see Tomlinson v. United States, 66 C. … As was said in Tomlinson v. United States, supra, *137 “different circumstances might require a different holding.”

Barnard-Curtiss Co. v. United States

301 F.2d 909 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1962

Plaintiff takes the same position herein as it did before the Board. … The common law English case of Hadley v. Baxendale is in point in this regard.

Marland v. United States

53 F.2d 907 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1931

School District v. Zediker, 4 Okl. 599, 603 , 47 P. 482 ; Board of Education v. State, 26 Okl. 366, 370 , 109 P. 563 ; State ex rel. v. Ross, 76 Okl. 11 , 183 P. 918 ; Consolidated School District No. 1 v. … Stoutz v. Brown, 5 Dill. 445 , Fed. Cas. No. 13505. And school land owned by Maryland as a proprietor and situated in Louisiana was also held to be nontaxable. City of New Orleans v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co., supra.

International Arms & Fuze Co. v. United States

101 Ct. Cl. 297 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1944

De Laval Steam Turbine Co. v. United States, 284 U. S. 61, 70, 71 ; Russell Motor Car Company v. United States, 261 U. S. 514, 528 , affirming Russell Motor Car Company v. United States, 57 C. … Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. United States, 265 U. S. 106, 123, 125 ; Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, supra, at p. 523.

Kellerman v. United States

504 F.2d 1128 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1974

In July 1968, Congress increased the wage rate for GS-18 employees across the board to $30,239. … Newman v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 784 (1958) ; Baxter v. United States, 129 Ct. Cl. 254 , 136 F. Supp. 748 (1954), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 936 (1956).

White

157 Ct. Cl. 939 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1962

Military pay; active duty pay; retired pay (nondisability) ; arbitrary action of correction board; limitation of *940 actions. — Plaintiff sues for additional active duty pay and also for additional nondisability retired … Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto and oral argument of counsel, it was concluded, on the basis of Lipp v. United States, 157 Ct.

Llamera v. United States

15 Cl. Ct. 593 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1988

Hamilton and a three-man boarding party from the Coast Guard Cutter Alert (Alert) boarded the vessel. … Vansant v.

Wade

553 F.2d 104 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1977

Armstrong v. United States, supra at 764; Kurfess v. … Abbott v.

Prefab Products, Inc. v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,378 · United States Court of Claims · May 9, 1986

Arlington Alliance, Ltd. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 347, 357-58 , 685 F.2d 1353, 1359 (1982); W.H. Moseley Co. v. … Thoen v. United States, 765 F.2d 1110, 1116 (Fed.Cir.1985); W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1336, 1338 (Fed.Cir.1983); Ske lly & Loy v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 370, 372 , 685 F.2d 414, 416 (1982); W.H.