Case law

Cornwell v. Hamilton

80 F. Supp. 2d 1101 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 18, 1999

Jenness v. … See McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. 140, 148 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 , 117 L.Ed.2d 291 (1992); Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496, 500-01 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982).

United States v. Jotham Bixby Co.

55 F.2d 317 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 11, 1932

The defendants include the city of Los Angeles, its board of park commissioners, and its board of library commissioners, and, in addition, a large number of individuals who are the heirs of the original owners of a tract … App. 69 , 268 P. 388 ; Slavich v. Hamilton, 201 Cal. 299 , 257 P. 60 ; Hall v. Fairchild-Wilton Co., 66 Cal. App. 615 , 227 P. 649 ; Mulvey v. Wangenheim, 23 Cal. App. 268 , 137 P. 1106 ; and Church v.

Collier

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 18, 2025

Brown v. Court 7 of Appeals – Third Dist., 2012 WL 368376, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012).” (Doc. No. 9 at 8 1) (additional citations omitted). … See Leer v.

Greer v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 24, 2019

See Canton v. 13 Harris, 489 U.S. 378-390-91 (1989); Brown, 520 U.S. at 404; Trevino v. Gates, 99 F.3d 14 911, 918 (9th Cir. 1996). … Brown at 407. (Internal citations omitted).

United States v. King

335 F. Supp. 523 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 23, 1971

In United States v. … Crawley v.

In re Ridgecrest Development Co.

129 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 31, 1950

That Ridgecrest Development Company, a corporation, Kern County, California, pursuant to a resolution passed by its board of directors, filed its voluntary petition in bankruptcy and was adjudged bankrupt on May 12, 1947. … V. That by an order dated December 12, 1949, the Referee in Bankruptcy, William A.

Voss v. Supermail/Western Union

675 F. Supp. 1210 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 9, 1987

See National Labor Relations Board v. Carson Cable TV, 795 F.2d 879, 881-82 (9th Cir.1986); Carpenters’ Local Union No. 1478 v. … Id., quoting National Labor Relations Board v. Jeffries Lithograph Co., 752 F.2d 459, 463 (9th Cir.1985).

People of California v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

726 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 6, 1989

To support its argument, TWA cited language from Newberry v. … Williams, 482 U.S. at 391-94 , 107 S.Ct. at 2429-30 ; Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v.

Citizens Development Corporation, Inc. v. San Diego, County of

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 2020

CMAX, Inc. v. Hall, 300 F.2d 265, 268 (9th Cir. 1962) 12 (citing Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254–55 (1936)). … Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 658 F.3d 1038, 1048–49 (9th Cir. 11 2011) (quoting Brown v.

In the Matter of FP Newport Corp., Ltd.

144 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 11, 1956

United States v. Metcalf, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 677 ; State Board of Equalization of State of California v. Boteler, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 386 ; California State Board of Equalization v. … Newport Corp. v. Sampsell, 9 Cir., 216 F.2d 344 . Neither the receipt of the royalties on contracts after liquidation, nor the sales constituted doing business. As said in *509 California State Board of Equalization v.

United States v. 360 Acres of Land

174 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 25, 1959

Skinner, 1941, 18 Cal.2d 349 , 115 P.2d 448 , 492, 149 A.L.R. 299 , where the court quoted with approval, from Bull v. … In view of these facts and of the precepts set forth in the foregoing quotation from Bull v.

United States v. Vibradamp Corporation

257 F. Supp. 931 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 7, 1966

For example, in Want v. C. I. … In Field v. United States, 9 Pet. 182 , 9 L.Ed. 94 (1835), one Brown had made an assignment for the benefit of creditors under court supervision.

Emert v. San Diego Probation Department

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 2025

Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing Foman 13 v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). … Brown, 953 F.3d 25 at 574.

Dunbar v. Pena

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 16, 2022

Kona Enters., Inc. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 402‒04 (1997); Navarro v. Block, 72 F.3d 712, 5 714 (9th Cir. 1995).

Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.

64 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 9, 1946

In the case of Coe v. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 361 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 318 , 87 L.Ed. 315 , arising in our own district, we find some pertinent language wherein the court stated: “All of these cases proceed on the ground that the taxation or regulation

Colden v. Asmus

322 F. Supp. 1163 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 18, 1971

In recent years, a man enlisting in the Navy could expect to serve in such places as the • “brown water Navy” in Vietnam, a recruiting station in Seattle or on the. high seas. In the case of United States v. … Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Merritt, 282 F.2d 924, 928-929 (6th Cir. 1960).

Hendon v. Ramsey

528 F. Supp. 2d 1058 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 28, 2007

The CTCA requires that a tort claim against a public entity or its employees be presented to the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, formerly known as the State Board of Control, no more than six months … The CTCA requires that a tort claim against a public entity or its employees be presented to the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, formerly known as the State Board of Control, no more than six months

San Diego Cnty. Sch. Risk Mgmt. Joint Powers Auth. v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

339 F. Supp. 3d 1019 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 16, 2018

Al v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, et. Al. , 65 Cal. Comp. Cases 1441 , 2000 Cal. Wrk. Comp. … Decisions by the Workers Compensation Appeals Board are not binding precedent, but are persuasive in front of the WC Board. BART , 111 F.Supp.3d at 1072 n. 4 ; Griffith v. WCAB , 209 Cal.

Pirelli v. United States

729 F. Supp. 715 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 26, 1990

Special Assistant United States Attorney Kimberly Brown appeared on behalf of the respondent. … See Brantz v. United States, 724 F.Supp. 767, 772 (S.D.Ca.1989).

Wenzel & Henoch Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Water Dist.

18 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 24, 1937

Higgins (1915) 170 Cal. 541 , 150 P. 769 ; Brown v. Aguilar (1927) 202 Cal. 143 , 259 P. 735 ; Monson v. … See United States v. Gleason, supra; Martinsburg & Potomac R. R. Co. v. March, supra. The . fact that the clause does not say so in so many words does not stand in the way of this interpretation. See Brown v.