Case law

Allen v. Clark

22 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 1938

L.R. 544; Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co., 1928, 276 U.S. 518 , 48 S.Ct. 404 , 72 L.Ed. 681 , 57 A.L.R. 426 ; Bullard v. … East Side Canal & Irrigation Co., 1908, 211 U.S. 293 , 29 S.Ct. 111 , 53 L.Ed. 189 (corporation organized for the sole purpose of bringing federal suit); Board of Com’rs of Lake County v.

Spalding v. United States

17 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 16, 1937

Board of Equalization (1933) 288 U.S. 325 , 53 S.Ct. 388 , 77 L.Ed. 812 . The taxpayer insists that these principles should be applied to the facts in her case, as they were in Burnet v. … Board of Harbor Commissioners of Los Angeles (1933) 130 Cal.App. 367 , 20 P.(2d) 130, 135.

Distribuidora Del Pacifico, S. A. v. Gonzalez

88 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 6, 1950

California Civil Code, Sec. 1789; and see, Bower-Geibel Wholesale Co. v. Sears-Roebuck & Co., 1946, D.C.Cal., 69 F.Supp. 158, 159 ; Pederson v. Goldstein, 1945, 70 Cal.App.2d 155 , 160 P.2d 878 ; Grupe v. … This firm was employed by Gonzalez before the merchandise was placed on board ship, to examine its condition and issue a certificate. This they did.

Harper Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

377 F. Supp. 3d 1134 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 28, 2019

(Policy § V, ¶ 18.) … See, e.g. , Brown v. Mid-Century Ins. Co. , 215 Cal. App. 4th 841 , 858, 156 Cal.Rptr.3d 56 (2013) ; see also Love , 221 Cal.

In re Imperial Irr. Dist

38 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 24, 1941

App., at page 129 of 35 P.2d: “Section 39, supra, specifies that the board of directors shall levy a tax covering all the interest coupons falling due, not a part or parcel thereof, within the discretion of the taxing board … Board of Supervisors, 183 Cal. 434 , 192 P. 40 ) and the courts will not interfere with such a classification, unless it is manifestly arbitrary or unreasonable. Rainey v.

Polanski v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

378 F. Supp. 2d 1222 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 2005

See, Savage v. Glendale Union High School, 343 F.3d 1036, 1040 (9th Cir.2003); Association of American Medical Colleges v. U.S., 217 F.3d 770 , 778 (9th Cir.2000); Reynolds v. … See, Safe Air for Everyone v.

United States v. Terrones

712 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, S.D. California · May 3, 1989

The 1975 brown and yellow Ford pickup is registered to one Joe Martinez at defendant Terrones’ current residence. … V.

Capadona v. the Lake Atlin

101 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 19, 1951

Lake Atlin he was compelled to board the vessel from the barge. … Those persons who are engaged to supply this fuel must board the vessel and are necessarily exposed to the same hazards and risks of the seamen.

First San Diego Properties v. Exxon Co.

859 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 25, 1994

De La Cruz v. Tormey, 582 F.2d 45, 48 (9th Cir.1978). … Defendants directed the court to the case of United States v.

Petition of Kutay

121 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, S.D. California · May 28, 1954

He was notified by telegram, “Present yourself to the draft board. Obtain form 301 and sign it.” … Machado v. McGrath, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 70 , 193 F.2d 706 ; Petition of Berini, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 112 F.Supp. 837 . 10 . Acheson v. Wohlmuth, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 375 , 196 F.2d 866 ; Revedin v.

Simmons v. Birge Co.

52 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 10, 1943

Browne, Statute of Frauds (5th Ed.) § 371. In Breckinridge v. Crocker, 78 Cal. 529 , 21 P. 179 , the court said: ‘The memorandum must contain all the material elements of the contract/ Again, in Craig v. … See, also, Sannickson v. Brown, 5 Cal. 57 ; Ashley v. Vischer, 24 Cal. 322 , 85 Am.Dec. 65. None of the cases decided in this state, and cited above, will be found to conflict with this view.

Murray v. American Surety Co. of New York

61 F. 273 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 23, 1894

within four years from the time it shall be' declared to be insolvent or be thrown into liquidation, as the case may be, unless at the expiration of such time it shall obtain the consent in writing from a majority of the board … East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Co. v. Southern Tel. Co., 112 U. S. 306 , 5 Sup. Ct. 168; Windsor v. McVeigh, 93 U. S. 276 .

Lloyd v. United States

211 F. Supp. 750 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 17, 1962

(United States v. Brown, 1954, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 ; The Tungus v. Skovgaard, 1959, 358 U.S. 588, 592-594 , 79 S.Ct. 503 , 3 L.Ed.2d 524 ; Hess v. … (Miller v.

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Baden

83 F. Supp. 208 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 21, 1949

See, Brown v. Brown, 1915, 170 Cal. 1, 5-6 , 147 P. 1168, 1171 ; Maxwell v. Maxwell, 1944, 66 Cal.App.2d 549, 551-553 , 152 P.2d 530 ; Franklin v. Franklin, 1945, 67 Cal.App.2d 717, 720-721 , 155 P. 2d 637 ; Majors v. … See, Claffy v. Forbes, D.C.Wash.1922, 280 F. 233 , per Judge Neterer. Johnson v. White, 8 Cir., 1930, 39 F.2d 793 ; Kaschefsky v. Kaschefsky, 6 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 836 ; Collins v.

United States v. Morris

154 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 14, 1957

Wells, by Gillig v. … Higgins v. McGrath, D.C.W.D.Mo.W.D.1951, 98 F.Supp. 670 .

Earth Island Institute, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.

92 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 7, 2000

(citing Farrar v. … In United States v.

Acret v. Harwood

41 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 25, 1941

State Board of Equalization, D.C.Cal, 1937, 21 F.Supp. 604 ; Rok v. Legg, D.C.Cal., 1939, 27 F.Supp. 243 . … (See National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Corp., 1937, 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 ), and the Fair Labor Standards Act, 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. (See United States v.

Los Angeles Ry. Corp. v. Railroad Commission of California

29 F.2d 140 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 10, 1928

Ed. 777 ; San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Co. v. City of Alameda (D. C.) 226 F. 889 ; Knoxville Gas Co. v. City of Knoxville (C. C. … San Diego Land Co. v. Jasper, 189 U. S. 439 , 23 S. Ct. 571 , 47 L. Ed. 892 ; McCardle v. Indianapolis Co., 272 U. S. 400 , 47 S. Ct. 144 , 71 L. Ed. 316 .

Royce v. Bonta

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 5, 2025

.: 3:23-cv-02012-H-BLM TIFFANY BROWN; and KRISTI 13 CARAWAY, … The Court requests that the parties be prepared 1 || to discuss Miller v.

Laureano-Gonzalez v. Main

125 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 22, 1954

An appeal’ taken to the-Immigration Board of Appeáls was dismissed on August 27, 1953. The critical question presented on this-motion to dismiss is whether the Attorney General is an indispensable party. … As stated by the Supreme Court in Williams v.