The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 SARA ROYCE; SARAH CLARK; Case No.: 3:23-cv-02012-H-BLM
TIFFANY BROWN; and KRISTI
13
CARAWAY, ORDER REQUESTING PARTIES BE
14 PREPARED TO ADDRESS SECOND
Plaintiffs,
CIRCUIT CASE AT HEARING
15
v.
16
TOMÁS ARAGÓN, in his official
17 capacity as the State Public Health
Officer,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21 On December 20, 2024, Plaintiffs Sara Royce, Sarah Clark, Tiffany Brown, and
22 Kristi Caraway filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) against Defendant Tomás
23 Aragón. (Doc. No. 48.) On January 10, 2025, Defendant Aragón filed a motion to dismiss
24 the TAC. (Doc. No. 50.) A hearing on Defendant’s motion is currently set for March 10,
25 2025, at 1:30 p.m. (Doc. No. 56.)
26 On March 3, 2025, the Second Circuit issued a decision in the case Miller v.
27 McDonald, __ F. 4th __, 2025 WL 665102 (2d Cir. 2025), involving a free exercise
28 challenge to a school immunization law. The Court requests that the parties be prepared
1 || to discuss Miller v. McDonald at the hearing scheduled for March 10, 2025.
2
3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 ||DATED: March 5, 2025 I |. JI { fd
5 MARILYN L. HUFF, District J
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
9
10
1]
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28