Case law

Murphy v. United States

78 F. Supp. 236 · District Court, S.D. California · May 28, 1948

Plaintiff then protested, and on October 10, 1940 filed with the Board of Tax Appeals [now the Tax Court] a petition for redetermination of the deficiency. … [Girard Trust Co. v. United States, 1926, 270 U.S. 163 , 46 S.Ct. 229 , 70 L.Ed. 524 ; Colgate Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United States, 1932, 58 F.2d 499 , 74 Ct.Cl. 562 ; McKenney v.

Mubanga

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 6, 2026

Moreover, in constitutional adjudication as elsewhere, equitable remedies are a special 20 blend of what is necessary, what is fair, and what is workable.”); Brown v. … Board of 21 Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 (1955) (“Traditionally, equity has been characterized by a 22 practical flexibility in shaping its remedies and by a facility for adjusting and reconciling 23 public and private

Easter v. CDC

694 F. Supp. 2d 1177 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 9, 2010

Still, he has not provided a copy of a tort claim submitted to the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board. … See Wolff v.

In re Liquimatic Systems, Inc.

194 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, S.D. California · May 31, 1961

Tokar v. Redman, 1956, 138 Cal. App.2d 350 , 291 P.2d 987 ; Fissel v. Monroe, 1917, 33 Cal.App. 756 , 166 P. 607 ; White v. Besse, 1904, 145 Cal. 223 , 78 P. 649 ; Morgan v. Hecker, 1888, 74 Cal. 540 , 16 P. 317 . … Freeman v. La Morte, 1957, 148 Cal.App. 2d 670 , 307 P.2d 734 ; Security-First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles v. Bruder, 1941, 44 Cal.App.2d 767 , 113 P.2d 3 ; Adams v.

Board of Trustees of the Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glass Workers Local Union 1399 Health & Welfare Trust v. Summit Commercial Floors, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 23, 2021

Union #1399 Health & Welfare Tr. v. Summit Com. Floors, Inc., No. 1 321CV00081BENAHG, 2021 WL 2014793, at *1 (S.D. Cal. May 20, 2021). … Compare ECF No. 18 9 at 4-8 (citing Wigton v. Murphy, 410 F. Supp. 3d 1121, 1121-22 (D.

Slawski v. L. H. Eubank & Son

35 F. Supp. 275 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 1940

One group functions to move the board from a vertical to a lateral *276 position. Another and unrelated group operates to accomplish lateral adjustment of the board. … This brings plaintiff under the ruling in the leading cases of Reckendorfer v. Faber, 92 U.S. 347 , 23 L.Ed 719, and Pickering v. McCullough, 104 U.S. 310 , 26 L.Ed. 749 .

Rickson v. Ward

359 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, S.D. California · May 25, 1973

Dellaverson v. Laird, supra; Feliciano v. Laird, supra; Townley v. Resor, supra; Roth v. Laird, 446 F.2d 855 (2nd Cir. 1971) . 2. … United States v. Guaraldi, supra; United States v. Cate, supra. 5.

Payne v. Clarke

271 F. 525 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 8, 1921

Co. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, 97 , 35 Sup. Ct. 494, 495 ( 59 L. Ed. 853 , L. R. … In this behalf, plaintiff’s contention is that under the decisions in Illinois Central Ry. v. Hoopes (D. C.) 233 Fed. 135 , C. & N. W. v. Stein (D. C.) 233 Fed. 716 , Johnson-Brown v. D., L. & W. R. R. (D.

Cesario

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 19, 2025

Brown (“Brown”) 7 8. Lyle Arnold (“Arnold”) 8 9. David F. … The TAC also purports to state claims against a “former Biocept board 2 member[]” named “Wilson.”4 Id. at 4.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange

186 F. Supp. 830 · District Court, S.D. California · May 20, 1960

C. v. … As the Court of Appeals stated in 264 F.2d 199 , 211: “Irrespective of what a purchase price note secured by a second trust deed may be under California law (Brown v.

Holiday v. United States

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 28, 2025

Kimmelman v. … Lord v.

United States v. Rodriguez

182 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 1960

Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 1954, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 66 , 223 F. 2d 531, 555 . … Jamos Brown Scott set out the codification of this same area made by the Institute of International Law, meeting in 1931 (James Brown Scott, “The Two Institutes of International Law,” 26 Am.

Koehler v. Pulvers

606 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 8, 1985

Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 109 , 128 CaLRptr. 901 (1976). Defendant submits no evidence or argument to this conspiracy aspect of the claim. … Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 110 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901 (1976).

Duke v. Webb

673 F. Supp. 1519 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 5, 1987

Rodrigues v. … See Covington v. Anderson, 487 F.2d 660 (9th Cir.1973). The Ninth Circuit case of Schlanger v.

Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp.

306 F. Supp. 2d 958 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2003

The Board Report specifically states: “Patent opposition due to work at MRI has been an issue since 1984..” (Id.) Further, the Board Report establishes Dow’s notice that the ’344 patent’s title was long in dispute. … For example, the Board Report commissioned by FilmTee’s Board states that the “Government investigated and requested information from FilmTec regarding [the] ’344 patent and MRI... [in 1985] and again in 1988.”

Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Southern California Gas Co.

102 F. Supp. 685 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 29, 1952

Navigation Co. v. Cunard S. S. … Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co., 204 U.S. 426 , 27 S.Ct. 350 , 51 L.Ed. 553 ; Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 222 U.S. 506 , 32 S.Ct. 114 , 56 L.Ed. 288 ; Northern Pacific R. Co. v.

Ellis v. American Hawaiian S. S. Co.

77 F. Supp. 836 · District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 1948

While the Jackson case cited with approval Collins v. Dollar S. S. Lines, D.C., 23 F.Supp. 395 , and Meyer v. Dollar S. S. Lines, 9 Cir., 49 F.2d 1002 , which were both criticized in Aguilar v. … And in the Meyer case the accident was on board sHp, which ship was completely in the control of the owner.

McFarland v. United States

351 F. Supp. 394 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 1, 1972

v. … The Board relied heavily on Bew v. United States, 286 F.2d 570 (4th Cir. 1961), a case whose facts closely parallel those of the instant case.

United States v. Allen

193 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, S.D. California · May 8, 1961

Brandow v. United States, 9 Cir., 1959, 268 F.2d 559 ; Weinstock v. United States, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 231 F.2d 699 ; Freidus v. United States, 1955, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 133 , 223 F.2d 598 ; Rolland v. … United States, 9 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 439 , certiorari denied 1949, 337 U.S. 925 , 69 S.Ct. 1169 , 93 L.Ed. 1733 ; exclusion board in military area established under Executive Order, United States v.

United States v. Ballard

35 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 8, 1940

Thus, in People v. … Brown v. New Jersey, 1899, 175 U.S. 172 , 20 S.Ct. 77 , 44 L.Ed. 119 . As tersely put by the Supreme Court of .California, in People v.