Case law

Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 24, 2020

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S, 11 915, 919 (2011) (citation omitted). … Sadana also participated in telephonic board meetings with Brown 16 who was in San Diego. (Id.) Defendant Sadana is a board member of MedImpact 17 Arabia, and is a resident of Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Ex parte Naoe Minamiji

36 F.2d 422 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 4, 1929

The Chinese Exclusion Act, the terms of which were considered in Tom Hong v. U. S., 193 U. S. 517 , 24 S. Ct. 517, 519 , 48 L. … In our own circuit, [Weedin v.

Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC

309 F.R.D. 631 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 18, 2015

(ECF No. 380-1, at 12; ECF No. 380-6 (Brown Tr.), Ex. 10 at 460:24-25.) 5 Plaintiffs argue that the “value” Brown received was de minimis, at best. … Plaintiffs highlight that Brown described the information from the three-day course as “minimal” and “basic or less.” (ECF No. 405 at 23; ECF No. 405-3 (Brown Tr.), Ex. 7 at 67:24.)

Brashear

District Court, S.D. California · May 19, 2026

Winter v. NRDC, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008). … Grp., Inc. v. Adamo 17 Constr., Inc., No. 25-CV-01419-BAS-SBC, 2025 WL 2799678, at *3 (S.D. Cal.

United States Ex Rel. Tietz v. Secretary of the Navy

156 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 23, 1957

Petrowski v. Nutt, 9 Cir., 161 F.2d 938 ; Money v. Wallin, 3 Cir., 186 F.2d 811 . 5. … McCord v. Page, 5 Cir., 124 F.2d 68 ; See: Mayborn v. Heflebower, 5 Cir., 145 F.2d 864 . 6.

Meyer v. United States

244 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 8, 1965

The court in Tomlinson v. … [Citing Comm. v. Duberstein, supra.] The court concludes, after a detailed consideration of the evidence in this case, that the dominant purpose of the Board of Directors in making the payments to Mrs.

Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

102 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 20, 1952

Bauman v. Ross, 1896, 167 U.S. 584, 593 , 17 S.Ct. 969 , 42 L.Ed. 270 ; Dohany v. Rogers, 1929, 281 U.S. 362, 369 , 50 S.Ct. 299 , 74 L.Ed. 904 ; U. S. v. Hess, 8 Cir., 1934, 70 F.2d 142 ; U. S. v. … Allen v. United States, D. C., 1926, 10 F.2d 807, 809 . (3) Congress took great pains to specify the qualifications of those who were to sit on the newly created Appeal Boards.

United States v. Secretary of the Navy

287 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 30, 1968

In re Grimley, 137 U.S. 147 , 11 S.Ct. 54 , 34 L.Ed. 636 (1890); Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393 , 81 S.Ct. 1230 , 6 L.Ed.2d 365 (1960); Chavez v. Fergusson, 266 F.Supp. 879 (N.D.Cal., 1967). … Under these circumstances the Local Draft Board by virtue of 50 U.S.C. App. *928 § 456(c) (2) (D) was bringing a soldier, who had already enlisted, into active service. United States v.

Hoyer v. United Dressed Beef Co.

67 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 14, 1946

See Kennedy v. Board of Education, 1890, 82 Cal. 483, 490 , 22 P. 1042 ; Zurich, etc., Insurance Co., Ltd., v. Kinsler, 1938, 12 Cal.2d 98, 99 , 81 P.2d 913 ; Shell Oil Co. v. … Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1943, 318 U.S. 253 , 63 S.Ct. 585 , 87 L.Ed. 744 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Isthmian S. S.

San Diego Cnty. Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union

325 F. Supp. 3d 1088 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 2018

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown , 564 U.S. 915 , 919, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). … Daimler , 571 U.S. at 139 n. 20, 134 S.Ct. 746 ; see Brown v.

Greeson v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.

55 F.2d 321 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 1931

See Jackson v. United States, 230 U. S. 18 , 33 S. Ct. 1011 , 57 L. Ed. 1363 , and Gray v. Reclamation District, 174 Cal. 624 , 163 P. 1024 . … In San Joaquin Irrigation Co. v.

Inglewood Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Richardson

121 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 28, 1954

See Phoenix-Buttes Gold Mining Co. v. Winstead, D.C.Cal.1914, 226 F. 863 . … Finally he cooperated with, and assisted, the Home Loan Bank Board’s conservator in relieving him.

Mendoza-Martinez v. Rogers

192 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 18, 1960

Plaintiff had resided in the United States from the date of his birth up to the time of his departure from the United States as set forth in Finding of Fact V above. VII. … Plaintiff appealed the decision of the special inquiry officer to the Board of Immigration Appeals, United States Department of Justice, and on October 23, 1953, said Board dismissed plaintiff’s appeal.

In re Purkett, Douglas & Co.

50 F.2d 435 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 1931

A.) 183 F. 913, 915 ; Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox, 264 U. S. 426 , 44 S. Ct. 396, 398 , 68 L. Ed. 770 ; and Weidhorn v. Levy, 253 U. S. 268 , 40 S. Ct. 534 , 64 L. Ed. 898 . … In Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v.

Brashear

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 9, 2026

FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE 14 CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD … See Escobedo v.

Aguilar

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 27, 2026

P. 41(b); Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 3 || F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Ferdik v. … Lewis v. Donovan, Case No. 21-cv- 16 || 1266-BAS-KSC, 2021 WL 6051571, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2021) (quoting Johnson v. 17 || Pamplin, No. 17-CV-00560-BAS-BLM, 2019 WL 494630, at *3 (S.D. Cal.

In re Aero Services, Inc.

75 F. Supp. 347 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 31, 1947

Wilkins, 4 Cir., 43 F.2d 670 ; In re Clayton Magazines, 2 Cir., 77 F.2d 852 ; City of Springfield v. Hotel Charles Co., 1 Cir., 84 F.2d 589 ; Dickinson v. Riley, 8 Cir., 86 F.2d 385 ; Board of Directors St. … Middelkamp v.

Stanz

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 20, 2026

On July 21, 2026, GRANT | SHENON | ALMARAZ, A Professional Law 22 Corporation (“GSA”) and all attorneys associated with it filed an ex parte motion to 23 withdraw from representation of Defendants Jordan Brown … Darby v. City 2 of Torrance, 810 F. Supp. 275, 276 (C.D. Cal. 1992).

Bell v. Hood

71 F. Supp. 813 · District Court, S.D. California · May 2, 1947

United States, 9 Cir., 1930, 41 F.2d 54 ; Brown v. United States, 9 Cir., 1926, 12 F.2d 926 . … Bell v. Hood, supra, 327 U.S. at 684 , 66 S.Ct. 777 ; Board of Commissioners of Jackson County v. United States, 1939, 308 U.S. 343, 349, 350 , 60 S.Ct. 285 , 84 L.Ed. 313 ; Dooley v.

United States v. Rindge

208 F. 611 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 27, 1913

Goddard on Easements, 270; Gaines v. Lunsford, 120 Ga. 370 , 47 S. E. 967 , 102 Am. St. Rep. 109 ; McDonald *621 v. Lindall, 3 Rawle (Pa.) 492; Dee v. King, 73 Vt. 375 , 50 Atl. 1109 ; Nichols v. Luce, 24 Pick. … Justice Brown in Camfield v. U. S., 167 U. S. 528 , 17 Sup. Ct. 868, 42 L.