Case law

Miller v. Becerra

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 2020

Warth v. … Shooting Sports Ass’n v. Holder, 727 F.3d 975, 981 (9th Cir. 2013) 26 (quoting Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 521 F.3d 1238, 1240 n.1 (9th Cir. 2008)). 27 The bar for standing is not particularly high.

Smith Arizmendez v. McCourt

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 19, 2024

Leer v. … Johns v.

Hernandez v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 18, 2023

Garrison v. … Brown-Hunter v.

Williams v. United States Marshals

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 25, 2022

Ivey v. Board of Regents of the 28 University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 1 B. … See 4 || Lira v.

Tijerina v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2022

Specifically, Plaintiff requests the Court 15 take judicial notice of articles and information from Defendant’s website; several of 16 Defendant’s employees’ and/or board members’ LinkedIn profiles; a map of Burlingame … (quoting Ray v.

Butler Li v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 22, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). … See Smartt v.

Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc.

924 F. Supp. 1559 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 29, 1996

Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board of Education, 868 F.2d 1085, 1088 (9th Cir.1989) (internal citations omitted). … Int’l v.

United States v. Schneiderman

106 F. Supp. 906 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 18, 1952

R., 7 Cir., 1940, 116 F.2d 96, 98 ; United States v. Polzin, D.Md.1942, 48 F.Supp. 476, 478 ; see also Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 159-160 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543 ; Brown v. … But as I read Dennis v.

J.J v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 1, 2025

v. … Corbett v. Pharmacare U.S., 4 Inc., 544 F. Supp. 3d 996, 1011 (S.D. Cal. 2021); Renn, 2023 WL 6050582, at *3 5 (applying “substantially similar” test); Brown v.

Leonard Eugene Ward v. M. H. Valadez

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 2, 2020

Hinton v. … See Olsen v. Idaho State Bd.

The Eclipse Group LLP v. Target Corporation

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 24, 2020

Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., Inc., 523 F.3d 973, 979 (9th Cir. 6 2008) (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 n.11 (1984)). … (finding reasonable Mayer Brown’s hourly rates 12 between $170 to $895 for work in a patent matter); San Diego Comic Convention v. Dan 13 Farr Prods., Case No. 14-cv-1865-AJB-JMA (S.D. Cal.

Johnson v. Athenix Physicians Group, Inc.'s

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 10, 2020

Franklin v. … Valles v.

In Re: Valladoid

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 17, 2022

Evid. 201; Reyn’s Pasta Bella, LLC v. … BAP 1995); accord Clark v.

Phillips v. Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 3, 2021

Chavez v. … Brown & Bain, 400 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir. 2005); this 12 includes any result of the litigation, excluding interests and costs, that “entail[s] a payment” by the defendant. Guglielmino v.

Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenan

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 30, 2020

Vance 26 v. … F.T.C. v.

Stark v. Stall

District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 2021

See Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1247 (9th 26 Cir. 2013). … Ctr. v.

Handal & Associates, Inc. v. Sandler

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 3, 2021

Nelson v. … See, e.g., Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A. v. Brown, 2017 U.S. Dist. 4 LEXIS 204184, at *17-20 (C.D.

Rogers v. Giurbino

288 F.R.D. 469 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 19, 2012

See United States v. … Burdensomeness, overbreadth, and prison safety An objecting party must make some showing that the interrogatory is unduly burdensome or overly board. See Hall v. Tehrani, No.

ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2025

Thus, in Baroness, the Trademark Board held 8 that “CMS” referring to Cabernet, Merlot, and Syrah varietals was not generic. Id. … Morgan v.

Rudolph v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 27, 2022

Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983) (“In Social 17 Security cases[,] the ALJ has a special duty to fully and fairly develop the record and to 18 assure that the claimant’s interests are considered.”) … Lewin v.