Case law

Cohen

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 21, 2026

See Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 12 159, 169 n. 17 (1985) (“The Court has held that § 1983 was not intended to abrogate a 13 State’s Eleventh Amendment immunity”); see also Brown v. Cal. … First, the Board incorrectly relies on Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. 3 Garrett, in which the Supreme Court held that claims arising under Title I of the ADA are 4 barred by the Eleventh Amendment. 531

Arenas v. United States

95 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 1951

United States, 1937, 299 U.S. 476, 497 , 57 S.Ct. 244 , 81 L.Ed. 360 ; Board of Commissioners of Creek County v. Seber, 1943, 318 U.S. 705, 715-717 , 63 S.Ct. 920 , 87 L.Ed. 1094 . … Sunderland v. United States, 1924, 266 U.S. 226, 233-234 , 45 S.Ct. 64 , 69 L.Ed. 259 ; United States v. Eastman, 9 Cir., 1941, 118 F.2d 421 ; Board of Commissioners of Creek County v.

City of Carlsbad v. Shah

666 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 20, 2009

The Board, therefore, granted the opposer’s motion for summary judgment. Id. at 1664. Similarly, in L.C. Licensing, Inc. v. … See Honda Motor *1166 Co. v.

Levanti v. Tippen

585 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, S.D. California · May 7, 1984

Ibid.; see also Tofano, supra, 718 F.2d at 314 ; Brown v. Board of Bar Examiners, 623 F.2d 605, 610 (9th Cir.1980). … Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-39 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 755-56 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Tofano v. Supreme Court of Nevada, 718 F.2d 313, 315 (9th Cir.1983).

Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co. v. McIver

27 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 7, 1939

This section has been construed in connection with exactly the same exclusionary clause in an insurance policy by the District Court of Appeal for the State of California in Brown v. Travelers Ins. … Co. v. Kennedy, 301 U.S. 389 , at page 395, 57 S.Ct. 809 , 81 L.Ed. 1177 ; Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Morris, 6 Cir., 27 F.2d 508 ; Murdie v.

Grajczyk v. DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY

210 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 8, 1962

The law is well settled that the exclusive remedy for the commission of an unfair labor practice is • in proceedings originally before the National Labor Relations Board. San Diego Building Trades Council, etc. v. … Union Starch and Refining Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 186 F.2d 1008 , 27 A.L.R.2d 629 ; Radio Officers Union, etc. v. N. L. R. B., 347 U.S. 17 , 74 S.Ct. 323 , 98 L.Ed. 455 .

Gonzalez v. Board of Trustees of San Diego Community College District

District Court, S.D. California · May 21, 2020

Dworkin v. … Clark v. State of California, 123 F.3d 2 1267, 1271 (9th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted). 3 In Hill v.

Petro v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.

95 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 1950

In Boulter v. … Justice Stone in Aschen-brenner v.

Polley v. Westover

77 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 15, 1948

Distributing Co. had its license suspended for three days pursuant to Sub-division 5, Rule 42 of the State Board of Equalization. The State Board rule was suspended October 9, 1944. 16. … V. The sum of $1,530.55 paid by Edith Buryi Polley, $1,530.87 paid 'by Alethea F. Polley, $1,530.87 paid by Frank A. Polley, and $1,530.55 paid by Fred M. Polley, to the defendant, Harry C.

Bernard v. U. S. Aircoach

117 F. Supp. 134 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 23, 1953

Co. v. … Co. v. Cackette, 9 Cir., 8 F.2d 259 . * * ” Also pertinent is Thomas v.

Stetson v. American Hawaiian S. S. Co.

63 F. Supp. 24 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 1945

V. … board another vessel as a crew member on his return to the United States.

Chervy v. PENINSULAR AND ORIENTAL STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY, LTD.

243 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 20, 1964

Barrette v. Home Lines, Inc., 168 F.Supp. 141 (S.D.N.Y.1958); Mulvihill v. Furness, Withy & Co., 136 F.Supp. 201 , (S.D.N.Y.1955). The case of Lawlor v. Incres Nassau Steamship Line, Inc., 161 F. … Co. v. Grant Bros. Const. Co., 288 U.S. 177 , 33 S.Ct. 474 , 57 L.Ed. 787 (1912); Baltimore & Ohio S. W. Ry. Co. v. Voigt, 176 U.S. 498 , 20 S.Ct. 385 , 44 L.Ed. 560 (1899); Schiemann v.

Carson v. Meador

120 F. Supp. 260 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 1954

Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752 , 67 S.Ct. 1493 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 ; Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 327 U.S. 540 , 66 S.Ct. 712 , 90 L.Ed. 839 ; Florentine v. Landon, 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 870 . … Williams v. Fanning, 332 U.S. 490 , 68 S.Ct. 188 , 92 L.Ed. 95 ; Navarro v. Landon, D.C.S.D.Cal., 106 F.Supp. 73— Byrne; Koepke v. Fontecchio, 9 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 125 .

United States v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.

124 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 22, 1954

Mazurosky v. United States, 9 Cir., 1939, 100 F.2d 958 . 4 . Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 ; Schino v. … And see, Pevely Dairy Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 363, 369-370 ; Johnson v. United States, 8 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 673, 676 . 8 . Theatre Enterprises v.

Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.

546 F. Supp. 2d 951 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 4, 2008

See Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir.1992) (citing U.S. Steel Corp. v. U.S., 780 F.2d 1465, 1468 (Fed.Cir.1984)). … See Sibia Neurosciences, Inc. v. Cadus Pharm. Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist.

Yonejiro Nakasuji v. Seager

3 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 1933

The decision of Claussen v. … Denholm Shipping Co., Ltd., v. Elting (D. C.) 55 F.(2d) 422 ; Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Annonyme v. Elting (D. C.) 55 F.(2d) 340 ; National Surety Co. v.

Saad v. Dalton

846 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 1, 1994

On April 1, 1993, a Board of Inquiry was held. This Board consisted of two females and one male. … Christoffersen v. Washington State Air Nat’l Guard, 855 F.2d 1437 , 1442 (9th Cir.1988); Muhammad v. Secretary of Army, 770 F.2d 1494, 1495 (9th Cir.1985).

Bullock's, Inc. v. United States

43 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 26, 1942

A claim that fails to meet the statutory requirements and that has been properly disallowed by the Commissioner as defective leaves the Board without jurisdiction to grant a refund. See United States v. … The action of the Board in dismissing the petition upon respondent’s motion was proper and there is not merit in the contention that it was without power so to do. Arabi Packing Co. v.

Bell v. Hood

71 F. Supp. 813 · District Court, S.D. California · May 2, 1947

United States, 9 Cir., 1930, 41 F.2d 54 ; Brown v. United States, 9 Cir., 1926, 12 F.2d 926 . … Bell v. Hood, supra, 327 U.S. at 684 , 66 S.Ct. 777 ; Board of Commissioners of Jackson County v. United States, 1939, 308 U.S. 343, 349, 350 , 60 S.Ct. 285 , 84 L.Ed. 313 ; Dooley v.

Troy Laundry Co. v. Lockwood

63 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 18, 1945

Acret v. Harwood, D. C., 1941, 41 F.Supp. 492 ; Neher v. Harwood, 9 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 846 . The subalterns in this case are not even members of the board. … It says it will be injured more than $3,000 if the board should find certain facts which may be in the books. Clearly, therefore, this allegation falls by the wayside under the ruling of the Supreme Court in McNutt v.