Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
0.73s
District Court, S.D. California · Jan 26, 2021
The staff gave Hay an 11 ultimatum: either report to the Betty Ford Foundation Drug Addiction Treatment Center, 12 or be fired and reported to the Medical Board of California. … Leite v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBlackmer v. Six Named Agents of the U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 2021
Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 19 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 20 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v. … Denton v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 12, 2026
(the 7 “Decedent”), a twelve-year-old child who was on a stand-up paddle board near De Anza 8 Cove in Mission Bay. (Id. ¶¶ 40, 48, 49.) … Khoja v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 14, 2020
See Brown-Hunter v. … Nichols v. Saul, 2019 WL 6252934, at *10 (S.D. Cal., 21 Nov. 22, 2019) (quoting Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495). A remand for an immediate award of 22 benefits is appropriate only in rare circumstances.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Apr 25, 2025
Monell, 436 U.S. at 690; Board of 12 the County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 402–04 (1997); Navarro v. … Lee v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSunPower Corporation v. Sunpower California, LLC
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 2, 2021
Corp. v. … & Loan Ass'n v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa., 873 F.2d 229, 231 (9th Cir. 1989) 5 || (quoting Bilbrey by Bilbrey v. Brown, 738 F.2d 1462, 1470 (9th Cir. 1984).
Cited 0 timesUnknownMARKEL AMERICAN INS. CO. v. Fitt
528 F. Supp. 2d 1010 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 18, 2007
Co. v. Mellone, 773 F.Supp. 189, 191 (C.D.Cal.1990)). … Trinh v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 894 F.Supp. 1368, 1372 (N.D.Cal. 1995); see Reliance Ins. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEnalasys Corporation v. Taylor
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 13, 2020
The new board in turn 23 fired all the corporation’s officers, including its president, Eric Taylor. … See Hightman v. FCA US LLC, 2009 14 WL 3780272, slip op. at *3 (S.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 20, 2023
Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 18 494.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDavallou v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals US Head Quarters
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 27, 2020
Artiglio v. Superior 11 Court, 27 Cal. Rptr. 2d 589, 591 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994); see also Brown v. … Co., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 21, 2020
West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988); Naffe v. … Caldwell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 13, 2026
DeLorme v. Sullivan, 924 F.2d 841, 846 19 (9th Cir. 1991). Substantial evidence means “more than a mere scintilla” but less than a 20 preponderance. Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971); Desrosiers v. … See Green v. Saul, No. 1:19-CV-00058-BAM, 19 2020 WL 1227895, at *7-9 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2020), adopted by2020 WL 3496998 (E.D. 20 Cal. June 29, 2020); Brown v. Berryhill, 697 F. App’x 548 (9th Cir. 2017); Diaz v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 1, 2020
Ashcroft v. … See 8 Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSan Diego County Lodging Association v. The City of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California · May 3, 2021
Id. at 1190; 14 accord Allied Concrete & Supply Co. v. … (See Browning Decl., ECF No. 13-1 ¶ 4). 22 Local 30 lobbied to pass the Ordinance and has an interest in upholding the Ordinance to 23 protect its members. (See id. ¶¶ 6-7).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSan Diego Cty. Credit Union v. Citizens Eq. First
360 F. Supp. 3d 1039 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 2019
Patent and Trademark Office's ("USPTO") Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") claiming the SDCCU Mark is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake or to deceive consumers when viewing CEFCU's Mark. ( Id. ¶¶ 5, 40 … ."); Agence France Presse v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Nov 20, 2020
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing 3 Bell Atl. Corp. v. … Agyeman, 390 F.3d at 1103 (quoting Wilborn v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · May 17, 2022
Brown 192 Cal. App. 4th 1212, 1233 (2011) (stating that “[t]he 8 admission of prior acts as propensity evidence encompasses both charged and uncharged 9 acts”) (citing People v. … Falsetta, 21 Cal. 4th 903, 917–918 (1999); People v. Brown, 77 10 Cal. App. 4th 1324, 1332–1334 (2011); People v. Garcia, 89 Cal. App. 4th 1321, 1331– 11 1332 (2001)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownReiger v. Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP
117 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 2, 2000
.”); Novak v. … Price Waterhouse's audit opinion stated in pertinent part: To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Altris Software, Inc.
Cited 35 timesPublishedPersian Gulf Inc. v. BP W. Coast Prods. LLC
324 F. Supp. 3d 1142 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 2018
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) ; Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l League of Postmasters of U.S. , 497 F.3d 972 , 975 (9th Cir. 2007). … Gilley Enter., Inc. v. Atl. Richfield Co., 588 F.3d 659 , 661 (9th Cir. 2009), and "the analysis under the Cartwright Act is identical to that under the Sherman Act," *1157 Name.Space, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna