Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

0.36s

  • Stanz v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 6, 2025

    Co. v. U.S. Dist. … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mansueto v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 7, 2025

    For example, in Harris v. … Ruiz v. McGuire, No. 16-CV-0388-AJB-BLM, 13 2017 WL 526542, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2017) (citing Harvest v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stanz v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 2025

    (“Defendants”) and to substitute 26 Defendant Jordan Brown pro se. ECF No. 179 (“Mot.”). … See generally 26 Suarez v. Del Toro, No. 22-cv-0021-GPC-BLM, 2023 WL 149105 (S.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stanz v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 2024

    [ECF No. 131] 15 JORDAN BROWN et al., 16 … See generally 26 Suarez v. Del Toro, No. 22-cv-0021-GPC-BLM, 2023 WL 149105 (S.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Arias

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 1, 2024

    (“Plaintiff” or “Brown”) moved this Court 18 to vacate and reenter its January 16, 2024, judgment so Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal could 19 be timely. … v. 7 || Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 507 U.S. 380, 394 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stanz v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 27, 2024

    15 [ECF No. 131] Defendants JORDAN BROWN; et al., … Phillips v. Tobin, 548 F.2d 408, 411-12 (2d. Cir. 1976); see also 11 v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cornwell v. California Board of Barbering & Cosmetology

    962 F. Supp. 1260 · District Court, S.D. California · May 2, 1997

    See, e.g., Jones v. State of Michigan, 525 F.Supp. 636 (E.D.Mich.1981) (State Board of Dentistry was a state agency); Johnson v. … Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners, 219 Cal.App.2d 504, 514 , 33 Cal.Rptr. 349 (1963). The constitutionality of the Cosmetology Act, the predecessor to the BCA, was challenged previously in Whitcomb v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Young's Market Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    12 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 21, 1935

    In Rosenberger v. Pacific Express Co., 241 U. S. 48 , 36 S. Ct. 510 , 60 L. … In Evansville Brewing Association v. Excise Commission (D.

    Reversed by State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co., 299 U.S. 59 (1936)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Greenley v. Kochava, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 27, 2023

    (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. 11 Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011))). … But 20 Brown is distinguishable.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Halus v. San Diego County Assessment Appeals Board

    789 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 20, 1992

    On February 4, 1992, the defendants San Diego County Assessment Appeals Board *328 and Ruth Williams filed a motion requesting dismissal of this case. … See Anson v. Merced County, 202 Cal.App.3d 1195 , 249 Cal.Rptr. 457 (1988); Glorietta Foods, Inc. v. City of San Jose, 147 Cal.App.3d 835 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 355 (1983).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Arias

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 16, 2024

    See Rose 22 v. … As explained in Rasberry, Anthony v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Arias

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 20, 2023

    Shinn v. … See Ford v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Kijakazi

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 31, 2023

    Kaufmann v. … James S. v. Kijakazi, 2023 WL 2536717 (S.D. Cal. 7 2023) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) and Buck v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leventhal v. Vista Unified School District

    973 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 1, 1997

    Second, California statutory law mandates the open nature of school board meetings not only in the Brown Act, Cal. … It is no defense to suggest that since the Brown Act created the Board meetings, the Brown Act can also authorize unconstitutional limitations on those meetings.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Stanz v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 27, 2023

    Am., Inc. v. AXA 15 Ins. Co., 2010 WL 11601204, at *3 (C.D. Cal. … See id.; Clarke v. Upton, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1037, 1043 (E.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stanz v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 2023

    Lee v. … which could be 8 afforded by Plaintiff or the JGH shareholders to seek recourse was futile, as Defendant 9 Brown improperly constituted the entirety of JGH’s Board . . . .”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Montgomery

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 27, 2022

    Only later was he charged with Jones’s murder. 12 13 See People v. Brown, 52 Cal. … People v. 8 Brown, 52 Cal. App. 5th at 910; (also Exhibit G at 21–24, 27).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Curiel

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 1, 2022

    See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); 4 Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). … See Lopez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Kijakazi

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 30, 2022

    Brown-Hunter v. … Orn v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Montgomery

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 10, 2022

    Peterson v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.