Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.39s

  • Nguyen

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 4, 2026

    Petitioner has appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals 9 (BIA). As a result, there is no administratively final order of removal. … Walters v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baldwin Academy, Inc. v. Markel Insurance Company

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 17, 2021

    Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. … MacKinnon v. Truck Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bradshaw

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 2026

    Lujan v. … See Brown v. Google LLC, 685 F. Supp. 3d 2 909, 941 (N.D. Cal. 2023).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Powers

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 2026

    Id.; see also Calhoun v. … Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Guerra

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2026

    See Calhoun v. … Due 14 process requires that the prosecution disclose exculpatory evidence within its possession. 15 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 924 (9th Cir. 16 2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lindland v. TuSimple, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 5, 2022

    Defendant’s Board of Directors approved the stock options after Plaintiff’s 21 termination date. Id. ¶ 4. … Zivkovic v. S. Cal. 15 Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1088 (9th Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mursal

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2026

    On June 15, 2026, an Immigration Judge 5 granted Petitioner asylum, see ECF No. 1-2 at 21, but DHS appealed the decision to the 6 Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), see id. at 26. … Lopez v. Garland, 631 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LaRose

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2026

    [Id.] 2 Petitioner appealed that order of removal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). 3 [Petition at 4.] She has remained in custody since October 30, 2025. 4 II. … See also Ibarra-Perez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • County of San Diego v. Babbitt

    847 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 3, 1994

    As the Court said in City of Angoon v. … Additional documents which the County claims the Court should consider include declarations of experts and of residents near the Campo Reservation, and a letter from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. Booking Holdings, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 27, 2023

    Brown, 791 F.App’x 643, 645 6 (9th Cir. 2019) (citing Schwarzenegger, 374 F.3d at 800-01). … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 21 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) (quoting Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 317).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Keith v. City of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 3, 2023

    Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)). … Id. at 62 (quoting Brown, 520 U.S. at 409).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kenner Antonio Corrales Guidel v. Jeremy Casey, Warden of the Imperial Regional Detention Facility; Jesus Rocha, Acting Field Officer Director, San Diego Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Markwayne Mullin, Secretary of

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 1, 2026

    Hamdi v. … Munoz Materano v. Arteta, 804 F. Supp. 3d 395, 416 (S.D.N.Y. 4 2025) (citation modified) (citation omitted); Noori v. LaRose, 807 F. Supp. 3d 1146, 1164 5 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ramirez v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · May 7, 2024

    See e.g., Coreno v. Hiles, 2010 WL 4 2404395, at *3 (S.D. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 6 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Raiser v. San Diego County

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 25, 2019

    Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 14 397, 403 (1997). This limitation stems from the “language of § 1983 itself,” which 15 “cannot be easily read to impose liability vicariously.” Id. (quotations omitted). … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). 23 “This inquiry has been described as a difficult one.” See Koistra v. Cty. of San Diego, 310 24 F. Supp. 3d 1066, 1086 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore v. Lankford

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 6, 2021

    v. … .”); and Bird v. 20 || Mayhew, 2016 WL 374555, at *7 (E.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • David Hoyos Amado v. United States Department of Justice, et al.

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 4, 2025

    Hernandez v. … would be 9 futile because the Board of Immigration Appeals is obligated to apply the binding 10 precedent of Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Silva v. Sayer

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 16, 2024

    Pierce v. … Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see 9 Leyva v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mitchell v. Bennett

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 2025

    Brown, No. 11-CV-2202-GPC (WVG), 2014 WL 1096189, at 14 *8 (S.D. Cal. … Brown, No. 11-CV-2202-GPC (WVG), 2014 WL 1096189, at *3 (S.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ali v. Franklin Wireless Corp.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 3, 2023

    Kim, and David Brown (collectively “Defendants”) filed an 23 opposition, to which Lead Plaintiff replied. (Doc. Nos. 47, 48.) … See Epstein v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Contreras v. Diaz

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 2020

    CivLR 5 15.1; Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 6 1989) (“[A]n amended pleading supersedes the original.”); Lacey v. … (ECF No. 10 at 8 (citing Brown v. Marshall, No. CIV S- 15 07-0956 MCE DAD P, 2012 WL 12906131, *9 (E.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.