Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
3.45s
Ellsworth v. Integon National Insurance Company
District Court, S.D. California · Apr 22, 2021
Fecht v. … Continental Insurance Company, 218 20 Cal.App.3d 69 (1990), Freedman v. State Farm Insurance Company, 173 Cal.App.4th 21 957 (2009) and Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 13, 2020
Streit v. 10 || Covington & Crowe, 82 Cal. App. 4th 441, 444 n.2 (2000). … Hedges v. Resolution Tr. Corp., 32 F.3d 1360, 1363 (9th Cir. 1994) (citing Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th Cir. 1982)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrazee v. Imperial County Jail Medical Staff
District Court, S.D. California · Apr 30, 2024
Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 14 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 15 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v. … Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th 24 Cir. 2007) (quoting Bennett v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jun 23, 2026
Petitioner filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals on 3 February 27, 2026. … .”); Rodriguez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 2026
In Demore v. … Nielsen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDuong v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
118 F. Supp. 2d 1059 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 17, 2000
In Reno v. … Gisbert v. U.S.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 2025
See Brown v. Harris, No. 1:12-CV-01472-GSA-PC, 2014 WL 711027, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 21 2014) (“The Local Rules provide for a motion, an opposition, and a reply. … DCD Programs, Ltd. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownThe Estate of Dominique McCoy v. County of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California · Jun 16, 2025
v. … at 1071; see also Karl v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCounty of San Diego v. Babbitt
847 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 3, 1994
As the Court said in City of Angoon v. … Additional documents which the County claims the Court should consider include declarations of experts and of residents near the Campo Reservation, and a letter from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 15, 2026
Brown v. Stroud, No. CV 08-2348 VRW, 2011 WL 13312050, 13 at *3 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011); Strifling v. Twitter Inc., No. 22-CV-07739-JST, 2024 WL 14 54976, at *1 (N.D. Cal. … See also Costar Grp., Inc. v. Com. Real Est. Exch., Inc., 150 F.4th 1056, 8 1064 n.1 (9th Cir. 2025) (holding that district court did not err by dismissing claims outside 9 scope of amend); Ross v. Wilmington Sav.
Cited 0 timesUnknown44 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 27, 1942
“In Rudd v. … People v. Armentrout, 1931, 118 Cal.App.Supp. 761 , 1 P.2d 556 . In Nobile v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNiss v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.
989 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 17, 1997
Contractors v. City of Oakland, 96 F.3d 1204 , 1211 (9th Cir.1996). In Jablon v. … See, e.g., Kakar v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 2, 2026
Block v. N. Dakota ex rel. Bd. of Univ. & Sch. … Pereira v. U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2026
See Calhoun v. … Due 14 process requires that the prosecution disclose exculpatory evidence within its possession. 15 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 924 (9th Cir. 16 2007).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 4, 2026
Petitioner has appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals 9 (BIA). As a result, there is no administratively final order of removal. … Walters v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 2026
Id.; see also Calhoun v. … Ashcroft v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBaldwin Academy, Inc. v. Markel Insurance Company
District Court, S.D. California · Dec 17, 2021
Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. … MacKinnon v. Truck Ins.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2026
On June 15, 2026, an Immigration Judge 5 granted Petitioner asylum, see ECF No. 1-2 at 21, but DHS appealed the decision to the 6 Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), see id. at 26. … Lopez v. Garland, 631 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2026
[Id.] 2 Petitioner appealed that order of removal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). 3 [Petition at 4.] She has remained in custody since October 30, 2025. 4 II. … See also Ibarra-Perez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna