Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

3.45s

  • Ellsworth v. Integon National Insurance Company

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 22, 2021

    Fecht v. … Continental Insurance Company, 218 20 Cal.App.3d 69 (1990), Freedman v. State Farm Insurance Company, 173 Cal.App.4th 21 957 (2009) and Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hammett v. Sherman

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 13, 2020

    Streit v. 10 || Covington & Crowe, 82 Cal. App. 4th 441, 444 n.2 (2000). … Hedges v. Resolution Tr. Corp., 32 F.3d 1360, 1363 (9th Cir. 1994) (citing Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th Cir. 1982)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brazee v. Imperial County Jail Medical Staff

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 30, 2024

    Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 14 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 15 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v. … Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th 24 Cir. 2007) (quoting Bennett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gebremedn

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 23, 2026

    Petitioner filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals on 3 February 27, 2026. … .”); Rodriguez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dopazo-Barroso

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 2026

    In Demore v. … Nielsen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Duong v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    118 F. Supp. 2d 1059 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 17, 2000

    In Reno v. … Gisbert v. U.S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lily v. Rosenow

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 2025

    See Brown v. Harris, No. 1:12-CV-01472-GSA-PC, 2014 WL 711027, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 21 2014) (“The Local Rules provide for a motion, an opposition, and a reply. … DCD Programs, Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The Estate of Dominique McCoy v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 16, 2025

    v. … at 1071; see also Karl v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • County of San Diego v. Babbitt

    847 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 3, 1994

    As the Court said in City of Angoon v. … Additional documents which the County claims the Court should consider include declarations of experts and of residents near the Campo Reservation, and a letter from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board to

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Al Khafaji v. Koenig

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 2, 2020

    Woods v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mascorro

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 15, 2026

    Brown v. Stroud, No. CV 08-2348 VRW, 2011 WL 13312050, 13 at *3 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011); Strifling v. Twitter Inc., No. 22-CV-07739-JST, 2024 WL 14 54976, at *1 (N.D. Cal. … See also Costar Grp., Inc. v. Com. Real Est. Exch., Inc., 150 F.4th 1056, 8 1064 n.1 (9th Cir. 2025) (holding that district court did not err by dismissing claims outside 9 scope of amend); Ross v. Wilmington Sav.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Corlin

    44 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 27, 1942

    “In Rudd v. … People v. Armentrout, 1931, 118 Cal.App.Supp. 761 , 1 P.2d 556 . In Nobile v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Niss v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

    989 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 17, 1997

    Contractors v. City of Oakland, 96 F.3d 1204 , 1211 (9th Cir.1996). In Jablon v. … See, e.g., Kakar v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • A.G.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 2, 2026

    Block v. N. Dakota ex rel. Bd. of Univ. & Sch. … Pereira v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Guerra

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2026

    See Calhoun v. … Due 14 process requires that the prosecution disclose exculpatory evidence within its possession. 15 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 924 (9th Cir. 16 2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nguyen

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 4, 2026

    Petitioner has appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals 9 (BIA). As a result, there is no administratively final order of removal. … Walters v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Powers

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 2026

    Id.; see also Calhoun v. … Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baldwin Academy, Inc. v. Markel Insurance Company

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 17, 2021

    Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. … MacKinnon v. Truck Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mursal

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2026

    On June 15, 2026, an Immigration Judge 5 granted Petitioner asylum, see ECF No. 1-2 at 21, but DHS appealed the decision to the 6 Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), see id. at 26. … Lopez v. Garland, 631 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LaRose

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2026

    [Id.] 2 Petitioner appealed that order of removal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). 3 [Petition at 4.] She has remained in custody since October 30, 2025. 4 II. … See also Ibarra-Perez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.