Case law

Moore v. Duran

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 9, 2023

Resnick v. … v.

N.R.

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 11, 2026

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 1 325 (1989); Andrews v. … Gibson v.

Mcgovern v. U.S. Bank N.A.

362 F. Supp. 3d 850 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 25, 2019

Corinthian Colleges, Inc. , 733 F.3d 928 , 932 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown , 565 U.S. 530 , 533, 132 S.Ct. 1201 , 182 L.Ed.2d 42 (2012) ). … Kilgore v. KeyBank Nat'l Ass'n , 718 F.3d 1052 , 1058 (9th Cir. 2013) ( en banc ) (quoting Chiron Corp. v. Ortho Diagnostic Sys., Inc. , 207 F.3d 1126 , 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) ).

Shields v. Dollar Tree, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 16, 2024

v. Lichtenegger, 7 913 F.3d 884, 892 (9th Cir. 2019). … See Applied Underwriters, 15 913 F.3d at 891 (reversing dismissal in part due to “the court’s failure to cite Rule 41(b)” 16 and “the permissive wording of its orders” (quoting Brown v.

San Diego Coastkeeper, et al. v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., et al.

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 24, 2026

Frew v. Hawkins, 540 U.S. 431, 437 (2004). 5 III. … Kasper v. Board of Election Comm'rs, 814 F.2d 332, 338 (7th Cir. 10 1987). For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the parties’ joint motion without 11 ||prejudice. [Doc. No. 36.]

Sullivan v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 25, 2024

Hill v. … (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 8 2015)); Burrell v. Colvin, 775 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2014). 9 1.

Alcantara v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 23, 2021

See Brown-Hunter 16 v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown- 22 Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495. Such error is not harmless and requires reversal. Id. at 489.

Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 30, 2024

See Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 483 P.3d 5 159, 164 (Cal. 2021) (cleaned up). … Bass v.

Abera v. San Diego Pacificvu LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 10, 2025

See Jones v. … Cal. 2 || Nov. 25, 2020) (denying prisoner’s IFP motion and denying the motion for TRO as moot); 3 || Olajide v. Brown, Case No. 18-cv-03991-CRB, 2018 WL 3328227, at *3 (N.D. Cal.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 4, 2021

SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, 15 AND (2) ORDERING v. … Griffin 2 ||v. County School Board, 377 U.S. 218, 226-27 (1964). Permitting or denying leave to file 3 ||a supplemental pleading or claim is left to the sound discretion of the court. Keith v.

Royce v. Bonta

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 17, 2025

Malik v. Brown, 16 5 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Callahan v. Woods, 658 F.2d 679, 683 (1981)); 6 accord Al Saud v. Days, 50 F.4th 705, 714 (9th Cir. 2022). … The “governing authority” is the 23 entity responsible for the school’s operation and control, such as the principal or the 24 governing board of the school district. Cal.

Alejandra Rodriguez; Al Allal v. Torrence’s Farm Implements Profit Sharing Plan II; Kirk Profit Sharing Plan II Administrative Committee

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 17, 2024

See, e.g., Brown v. Rawlings 13 Fin. … v.

Pliszka v. Axos Bank

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 13, 2024

Knutson v. … Leslie v. Brown Bros., Inc., 208 Cal. 606, 621 (1929). “There 17 are several well-recognized exceptions to this rule.” Golden Eagle, 20 Cal. App. 4th at 18 1386.

Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Welles

7 F. Supp. 2d 1098 · District Court, S.D. California · May 21, 1998

In Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. … CONCLUSION In Prestonettes v.

Keenan v. Pyle (In Re Keenan)

467 B.R. 191 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 13, 2011

See Keenan v. Pyle, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1078 , 175 L.Ed.2d 888 (2010). … See In re MacIntyre, 74 F.3d 186 , 187 (9th Cir.1996); In re Brown, 239 B.R. 204, 206-07 (S.D.Cal. *196 1999).

Cole v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 13, 2022

Gutierrez v. … Instead, the 28 ALJ’s ruling is analogous to what the Ninth Circuit found insufficient in Brown-Hunter v. 1 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015): the ALJ “simply stated [a] non-credibility 2 conclusion and then

Mascorro v. The City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 22, 2025

Kaley v. … .”); Ulmer v.

Wescott v. Gray

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 4, 2025

We finally discontinued that practice at the insistence of our board. … Men’s Colony v.

Najlbullah v. U.S. Military

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 11, 2022

Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 2 (1992) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989)); Lopez v. … Id. at 1103 (quoting Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 25 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)); see also Terrell v.

Scally v. Velasquez

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 11, 2022

v. … When a protected liberty interest is not at stake, the minimum 4 requirements of due process require only that “the findings of the prison disciplinary board 5 [be] supported by some evidence in the record.”