Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.68s

  • Greco D.O. v. Matthew Todd Ahern DO

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 16, 2021

    Williams, 729 F.2d 581, 582 (8th Cir. 6 1984); Harrop v. W. … Co., 14 729 F.2d at 582-83 (citing Bradford Exchange v. Trein's Exchange, 600 F.2d 99, 102 (7th 15 Cir. 1979) (per curiam); Thomas v. Colorado Trust Deed Funds, Inc., 366 F.2d 136, 139 16 (10th Cir. 1966)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dunsmore v. State of California

    District Court, S.D. California · May 22, 2025

    14, 2025, the undersigned issued an Order finding “the attorney- 18 client privilege applies to the CIRB Report information contained in the expert 19 reports of Gary Raney, Kelly Ramsey and Pablo Stewart” under Greer v. … the Chief Legal Advisor nor the Deputy Chief 22 Legal Advisor attended the CIRB meeting pertaining to the death of Raymond Dix 23 that is referenced in Jeffrey Keller’s report; instead, Heidi Williams from “CIRB 24 BOARD

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Polanco-Garcia

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2026

    Petitioner 4 appealed that order of removal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and that appeal is 5 pending. … Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brooks Entertainment, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 12, 2022

    Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 11 994 (2d Cir. 1989), to evaluate claims under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act as limited 12 by the First Amendment.7 Brown v. Elec. … In Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Walcoff v. Innofoods USA, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2023

    Id.; see also Brown v. Van’s Int’l 28 Foods, Inc., No. 22-CV-00001-WHO, 2022 WL 1471454, at *11 (N.D. Cal. … Kasky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Butler v. Valdez

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2022

    v. … Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 10 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 11 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. 22 Devices, More or Less, Halox Therapeutic Generator

    98 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 27, 1951

    One form of certificate shall be issued by the board of chiropractic examiners, which said certificate shall be designated ‘License to practice chiropractic,’ which license shall authorize the holder thereof to practice chiropractic … In People-v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Strauss v. Magana

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 8, 2021

    Id. at 690; Board of the Cty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 28 U.S. 397, 402‒04 (1997); Navarro v. Block, 72 F.3d 712, 714 (9th Cir. 1995). … Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ardic

    District Court, S.D. California · May 22, 2026

    This Court has applied 17 those factors to similar claims, see, e.g., De la Torre Duran v. Doe, Case No. 25cv3230 18 DMS (DDL); Ogandzhanian v. … See 3 || also Zhakuov v. Noem, No. 3:26-cv-00288-RBM-DDL, 2026 WL 517981, at *3 (S.D. Cal. 4 || Feb. 25, 2026) (quoting Kydyrali v. Wolf, 499 F.Supp.3d 768, 773 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wheeler v. Allison

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 2022

    ”) (citations omitted); 3 Silveira v. … See id. at 485; see also Petrocelli v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fluence Energy, LLC v. M/V/BBC Finland

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 22, 2023

    Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu, 7 14 F.3d 1427, 1429 (9th Cir. 1993). … (quoting Kilkenny v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nelson v. Silverman

    888 F. Supp. 1041 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 6, 1995

    Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982) (In Harlow v. … Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589, 597 , 51 S.Ct. 608, 611-12 , 75 L.Ed. 1289 (1931); Todd v. United States, 849 F.2d 365 (9th Cir.1988). 21 . Ferrel v. Brown, 847 F.Supp. 1524 (W.D.Wash.1993); Morales v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Escondido Union School District v. Chandrasekar

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 21, 2019

    Union School Dist. v. … The Board was to consider the 25 Agreement at its May 9, 2019 regular Board meeting, in closed session.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mohsenzadeh v. Kelly

    276 F. Supp. 3d 1007 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 6, 2017

    Boj noordi v. … Pittston Coal Group v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 24, 2023

    “Litigation” means Omnitracs LLC and XRS Corporation v. Platform Science, 8 Inc. … “Litigation” means Omnitracs LLC and XRS Corporation, v. Platform 8 Science, Inc.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • T & E Pastorino Nursery v. Duke Energy Trading & Marketing, L.L.C.

    268 F. Supp. 2d 1240 · District Court, S.D. California · May 19, 2003

    See Christianson v. Colt Indus., 486 U.S. 800, 808 , 108 S.Ct. 2166 , 100 L.Ed.2d 811 (1988) (citing Franchise Tax Board of California, 463 U.S. at 27-28 ); see also Duncan, 76 F.3d at 1486 . 1. … In People v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Royall

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 17, 2025

    Brown v. Kennard, 94 Cal. App. 4th 25 40, 44 (Ct. App. 2001). … O’Guinn v. Lovelock Corr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lindora, LLC v. Isagenix International, LLC

    198 F. Supp. 3d 1127 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 1, 2016

    Daimler, 571 U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 746, 751 (2014) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)). … See, e.g., Brown v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • United States v. Twombly

    475 F. Supp. 2d 1019 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 22, 2007

    Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 481 , 109 S.Ct. 3028 , 106 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989). But see S.O.C.,. Inc. v. … See U.S. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roller v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 22, 2022

    Defendant filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s request, which states two copies of the 19 Summons and Complaint were delivered to the Clerk of the San Diego County Board of 20 Supervisors. … Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington 3 || Restaurants Group, Inc., 375 F.3d 922, 925-26 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Am. Ass’n of 4 || Naturopathic Physicians v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.