Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.17s

  • In Re Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist.

    21 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 13, 1937

    See Helvering v. Powers (1934) 293 U.S. 214 , 55 S.Ct. 171 , 79 L.Ed. 291 ; Ohio v. Helvering (1934) 292 U.S. 360 , 54 S.Ct. 725 , 78 L.Ed. 1307 ; Brush v. … elected by a vote not of property owners, but of all electors within the district, the fact that the officers are subj ect to recall, as are all other officers of the state, the fact that, before bonds are issued by the Board

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 18, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 24 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robinson v. Madden

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 7, 2023

    Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782 (1978) (per curiam) (suit against State and its Board 19 of Corrections barred by Eleventh Amendment absent State's consent to suit). … Brown v. California 23 Dep't of Corrections, 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Dittman v. California, 24 191 F.3d 1020, 1025-26 (9th Cir. 1999)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. Retail Pro, Inc.

    673 F. Supp. 2d 1108 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 18, 2009

    SEC v. … .”); SEC v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Latham v. DOES

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 2020

    v. … Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 446–47 (9th 13 Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Newsom

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 2021

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 15 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … Booth v. Churner, 532 16 U.S. 731, 736 (2001); Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 936-37 (9th Cir. 2005).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern Cal. v. United States

    628 F. Supp. 1018 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 25, 1986

    In Arizona v. … Fuentes v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pine Valley House Resort, LLC v. Newsom

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2022

    Id. at 1058 n.3 (citing Coalition to Defend Affirmative 2 Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133 (9th Cir. 2012); Cardenas v. … Ore. 28 Rest. & Lodging Ass’n v. Brown, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2020 WL 6905319, at *4 (D. Or. 2020) 1 (quoting Ass’n des Eleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Quebec v. Harris, 729 F.3d 937, 948 2 (9th Cir. 2013)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bashinski Jr. v. United States

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 2, 2024

    See Brown v. Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc., No. 10 222CV00972RFBNJK, 2023 WL 4624691 (D. Nev. … Brown v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Hous., LLC, No. 23- 10 CV-567-JES-DDL, 2023 WL 7555305, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Greer v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 10, 2023

    Sheriff’s Department Critical Incident Review Board 3 The Sheriff’s Department Critical Incident Review Board (“CIRB”) is an internal 4 oversight board that reviews and investigates inmate deaths … Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 (2009)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Guerrero v. So

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 30, 2020

    Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 10 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 11 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v. … Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th Cir. 20 2007) (quoting Bennett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Greco D.O. v. Matthew Todd Ahern DO

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 2022

    Dental Servs. v. … See Turner v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Standard Oil Co.

    60 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 1945

    United States, 1944, 320 U.S. 549 , 64 S.Ct. 346 , 88 L.Ed. 305 ; Billings v. Truesdell, 1944, 321 U.S. 542 , 64 S.Ct. 737 , 88 L.Ed. 917 ; Local Draft Board No. 1 v. … Bullock’s, 1923, 190 Cal. 673 , 214 P. 649 ; White v. Davis, 1930, 103 Cal.App. 531, 541-543 , 284 P. 1086 ; Maggart v. Bell, 1931, 116 Cal.App. 306, 310, 311 , 2 P.2d 516 ; Lincoln v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 153 F.2d 958 (1946)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Vaught IV v. Oppedisano

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 30, 2020

    Ashcroft v. … the Board of 1 Parole Hearing . . . .”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. City of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 15, 2025

    The San Diego Regional 3 Water Quality Control Board (the “Water Board”) concurred with the Navy’s selected 4 remedy. … See Feder 16 v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Freddy Leyva v. Mr. Soto

    District Court, S.D. California · May 17, 2023

    Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 13 926, 943 (9th Cir. 2005). … Price v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kelly v. City of Poway

    District Court, S.D. California · May 13, 2022

    In California, state law has designated the State Water 14 Resources Control Board and nine regional boards––including the San Diego County 15 Regional Board (the “Board”)––as the principal state agencies authorized to … Council v. Sw.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Shell Oil Co.

    169 B.R. 684 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 11, 1994

    Robinson v. Michigan Consol. … In re Videocart, Inc., 165 B.R. 740 (Bankr.D.Mass.1994); Browning v. Navarro, 748 F.2d 1069 , 1076 n. 21 (5th cir.), reh’g denied en banc, 747 F.2d 1465 (5th Cir.1984); Fedders North Amer., Inc. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Nunez v. Ford Motor Company

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 12, 2023

    Starr v. … Browning v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc., 9 549 F. Supp. 3d 996, 1006 (N.D. Cal. 2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stroud v. Neuschmid

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 28, 2019

    Brown v. Mayle, 283 F.3d 1019, 1040 (9th Cir. 2002) judgment vacated on other 21 grounds, Mayle v. … Brown, 538 U.S. 901 (2003) (“The district court correctly concluded that 22 this state law claim is not cognizable on federal habeas review.”); see also Rood v. 23 Swarthout, No. 12CV01476-AC-P, 2019 U.S

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.