Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.64s

  • LaRose

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 17, 2025

    But the government appealed, and the Board of Immigration Appeals found that 27 Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I.&N. … Sept. 17, 2025) (same); Rodriguez v. Bostock, 19 || No. 3:25-cv-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McCormick v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2021

    Jan. 7, 2019) 14 (plaintiff argued the complaint did not refer to the videos and that his claims did not depend 15 on the videos); Brown v. … See Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Schuh v. O'Malley

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 9, 2024

    Brown-Hunter v. 15 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Reddick v. Cater, 157 F3.d 715, 722 16 (9th Cir. 1988)); Burrel v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cuyamaca Meats, Inc. v. San Diego & Imperial Counties Butchers' & Food Employers' Pension Trust Fund

    638 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 26, 1986

    On June 28, Local 229A filed an unfair labor practices charge against the Employers with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). … In Carter v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pegueros v. Pollard

    District Court, S.D. California · May 3, 2021

    See Ford v. Pliler, 590 F.3d 782, 20 789 (9th Cir. 2009); Rasberry v. Garcia, 448 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir. 2006); see also 21 Baker v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 484 F. App’x 130, 131 (9th Cir. 2012); Brown v. … Brown v. Miller, No. EDCV 14-1864 RNB, 2015 28 WL 269057, at *7 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Luther v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 6, 2020

    Heck v. … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 10 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a 11 tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Zoro v. O'Malley

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 19, 2025

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). “[T]he 9 burden of showing that an error is harmful normally falls upon the party attacking 10 the agency’s determination.” Molina v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494. 22 B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Archambeault

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 17, 2025

    This is because a Board of 23 Immigration Appeals’ opinion in “Matter of Yajure Hurtado” held that “noncitizens who 24 entered without inspection and were later apprehended in the interior are categorically 25 ineligible … See, e.g., Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25- 8 || cv-02304 CAS (BFM), 2025 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Green v. Thiessen

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 2023

    Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1172 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Brown v. Valoff, 422 11 F.3d 926, 937 (9th Cir. 2005)). … In support, Plaintiff cites Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Payment Logistics Limited v. Lighthouse Network, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 30, 2019

    (quoting Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962)). … Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Diu

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 14, 2026

    P. 12(h)(3); 17 Harmon v. Superior Ct. of State of Cal. … /vey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Arguello v. John Doe

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 2, 2024

    . § 1915A(b)(1)-(2); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 446-47 (9th 17 Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). … Nordstrom v. Ryan, 762 F.3d 903, 920 n.1 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting 20 Wheeler v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bonilla v. City of San Diego

    755 F. Supp. 293 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 1991

    Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727, 2738 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); see also Malley v. … The only evidence presented by Plaintiff on this issue is an article from the San Diego Tribune describing a public meeting of the San Diego Citizens’ Review Board on Police Practices.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Spatcher v. City of Oceanside

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 13, 2020

    Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 14 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 15 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v. … Bias v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shop My Porch, Inc. v. Sidransky

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 1, 2022

    Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co., 618 F.3d 970, 973 (9th Cir. 2010) 16 (citation omitted); see also Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., 913 F. Supp. 2d 881, 888 17 (N.D. … See Wyshak v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kinser v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 20, 2020

    Ashcroft v. … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 6 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held 7 liable solely because it employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ashline

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 2026

    . § 1915A(a), (b)(1)-(2); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 446-47 17 (9th Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). … See Rosati v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pinney & Topliff v. Chrysler Corporation

    176 F. Supp. 801 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 17, 1959

    Levy v. Scott, 1896, 115 Cal. 39, 42 , 46 P. 892 ; Hall v. Susskind, 1898, 120 Cal. 559, 563 , 53 P. 46 ; Truett v. Onderdonk, 1898, 120 Cal. 581, 588 , 53 P. 26 ; Goodrich v. … Edward Brown & Sons v. City and County of San Francisco, 1950, 36 Cal. 2d 272, 279 , 223 P.2d 231, 235 . 30 . 92 C.J.S., pp. 1027-1028; Restatement, Torts, § 892; Surface v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Prokopev

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 7, 2026

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004) (citing U.S. … Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hubka v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

    215 F. Supp. 2d 1089 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 2002

    John Bianchi, a board-certified orthopedist, is employed by Paul Revere and conducts medical reviews for the insurer. … Guebara v. Allstate Ins. Co., 237 F.3d 987, 992 (9th Cir.2001) (citation omitted).

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.