Case law

Scholder v. United States

298 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 23, 1969

See United States v. Eastman, 118 F.2d 421 (9th Cir. 1941); United States v. Preston, 352 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1965); Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Indians v. Puckkee, 321 F.2d 767 (10th Cir. 1963); Seifert v. … Seebach v. Cullen, 224 F.Supp. 15 (D.Cal.1963); Hill v. United States Board of Parole, 257 F.Supp. 129 (D.C.Pa.1966).

Chatman v. Cambero

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 14, 2022

Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 15 574 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). … See Foman, 371 U.S. at 182; Brown, 953 F.3d at 15 574; Eminence Cap., LLC, 316 F.3d at 1052. The Court therefore GRANTS 16 Defendants’ Motion to Amend. See Young v.

Zambrano-Burgos v. United States

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2021

Bowen v. … In 14 Gibbs v.

Yeargan v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 22, 2022

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015). And this Court 14 is “constrained to review the reasons the ALJ asserts.” Connett v. Barnhart, 340 F.3d 871, 15 874 (9th Cir. 2003). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 8 at 494.

Pacific Surf Designs, Inc. v. Whitewater West Industries, Ltd..r West

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 9, 2021

Living Designs, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont de 8 Nemours & Co., 431 F.3d 353, 361 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 9 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1996)). … Diaz v.

Casey

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 19, 2025

An immigration judge denied 26 Gomez Gomez bond, based on the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision in Matter of 27 Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. … See, e.g., Barco Mercado v. Francis, F.Supp.3d.__, No. 25-cv-6582 (LAK), 2025 WL 3295903, at *4 (S.D.N.Y.

Boykins v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 15, 2022

Brown, 520 14 U.S. at 410 (internal quotations omitted). … Id. at 1141–42 (citing Brown, 520 U.S. at 409).

Miguel v. LaRose

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 7, 2025

27 Despite originally succeeding at a bond hearing, the immigration judge allegedly changed 28 course thereafter and determined that he “lacked jurisdiction to redetermine Respondent’s | custody” “in light of’ the Board … .”); Vazquez 12 ||v. Feeley, No. 2:25-CV-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 13 |}2025) (same); see also Rodriguez v.

Mascorro v. The County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 22, 2025

Painters’ Tr. v. Ethan Enters., 480 F.3d 993, 999 27 (9th Cir. 2007). … Wilkins v. Santa Clara 12 || Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 20-CV-03256-EMC, 2022 WL 2834290, at *3 (N.D. Cal. July 20, 13 2022); Menefee v.

Blacksher v. Trump

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 16, 2021

v. … Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 14 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 15 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v.

Rios v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 7, 2020

v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489; see Eldridge, 2018 25 U.S. Dist.

In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation

242 F. Supp. 3d 1033 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 14, 2017

Copley v. Mingo County Board of Education, 195 W.Va. 480 , 466 S.E.2d 139 (1995). Id. at 884-85 (footnote omitted) (italicization in original). … Some Plaintiffs further allege overlap between Dongwon’s other subsidiaries and StarKist’s governing board. (See, e.g., ¡Kroger Compl. ¶ 23.)

Alibekov

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 14, 2026

This Court has applied 15 those factors to similar claims, see, e.g., De la Torre Duran v. Doe, Case No. 25cv3230 16 DMS (DDL); Ogandzhanian v. … Gao v. LaRose, 805 F.Supp.3d 1106, 1111 (S.D. Cal. 2025). See also 24 Zhakuov v. Noem, No. 3:26-cv-00288-RBM-DDL, 2026 WL 517981, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 25 25, 2026) (quoting Kydyrali v.

Dawes v. The People of the State of California

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 10, 2020

Board of 17 Regents of the University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 18 Finally, the “[c]ourt[] must consider the complaint in its entirety,” including 19 “documents incorporated into the complaint … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 13 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a 14 tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

LaRose

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 17, 2025

But the government appealed, and the Board of Immigration Appeals found that 27 Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I.&N. … Sept. 17, 2025) (same); Rodriguez v. Bostock, 19 || No. 3:25-cv-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash.

Loc Minh Nguyen v. Warden, et al.

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 21, 2025

See Kim 20 Ho Ma v. … Brown v. United States, 623 F.2d 54, 10 61 (9th Cir. 1980) (emphasis added). But that’s not the only circumstance in which the 11 Court may appoint counsel.

McCormick v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 2021

Jan. 7, 2019) 14 (plaintiff argued the complaint did not refer to the videos and that his claims did not depend 15 on the videos); Brown v. … See Smith v.

Schuh v. O'Malley

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 9, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. 15 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Reddick v. Cater, 157 F3.d 715, 722 16 (9th Cir. 1988)); Burrel v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015).

Cuyamaca Meats, Inc. v. San Diego & Imperial Counties Butchers' & Food Employers' Pension Trust Fund

638 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 26, 1986

On June 28, Local 229A filed an unfair labor practices charge against the Employers with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). … In Carter v.

National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 27, 2020

Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. 15 State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 578–79 (1986). … Ass’n des Eleveurs de Canards et 18 d’Oies du Quebec v. Harris, 729 F.3d 937, 948–49 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown, 476 19 U.S. at 579).