Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

0.35s

  • Drown v. United States

    203 F. Supp. 514 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 30, 1962

    Giblin v. … In Schnitzer v. C. I.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mora

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 23, 2026

    See Gonzalez v. … See Olajide v. Brown, Case No. 18-cv-03991-CRB, 19 2018 WL 3328227, at *3 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Issaka Nii Doodo Abubakar Saddick v. Jeremy Casey, Warden, et al.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 7, 2026

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004). “The traditional function of the 4 writ is to secure release from illegal custody.” Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 5 (1973). … See, e.g., Rodriguez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Casaudoumecq

    46 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 1942

    Leonard v. Bennett, 9 Cir., 116 F.2d 128 , 44 A.B.R.,N.S., 745; In re Brown, D.C.S.D.Iowa, 21 F.Supp. 935 , 36 A.B.R.,N.S., 828. In the case of Potter v. Union Central Life Ins. … In the case of Moser v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. Roache

    788 F. Supp. 1498 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 24, 1992

    Class II gaming consists of bingo, pull-tabs, lotto, punch boards, tip jars, and certain card games permitted under state law. Id. at § 2703(7)(A)(i). … Shevlin v. Schewe, 809 F.2d 447 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. City of Chicago, 534 F.2d 708, 711 (7th Cir.1976); Thomas v. Board of Educ., 607 F.2d 1043 , 1047 n. 7 (2d Cir. 1979); Watkins v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • United States v. City of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 17, 2024

    Id. 6 In 2019, the United States submitted a final remedial action completion report to the 7 San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (“Water Board”) regarding its Site 8 cleanup … Lane v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wilson v. CDCR

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 11, 2023

    Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). 9 “The purpose of § 1915A is ‘to ensure that the targets of frivolous or malicious suits need 10 not bear the expense of responding.’” Nordstrom v. … Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting 19 Bennett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maddern v. Austin

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 22, 2022

    Case Citations Deemed “Inapplicable” 16 In his discovery motion, Plaintiff cites Brown v. Sullivan, 916 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 17 1990), Rodriguez v. … No. 23 at 8, Brown, Rodriguez, and 5 Ibrahim address “bad faith” in the context of attorney’s fee awards. Brown, 916 F.2d at 6 495; Rodriguez, 542 F.3d at 709; Ibrahim, 912 F.3d at 1153.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ornelas v. Spearman

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 2020

    See Castro v. … See Slack v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Casey

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2026

    He appealed the denial of his asylum application to the Board 9 of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s decision in 10 February 2026. (Am. Pet. at 4.) … See Gomez Cabrera v. Blanche, United States Court 12 of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 26-948.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. 3,065.94 Acres of Land

    187 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 28, 1960

    Co. v. Board of County Supervisors, 10 Cir., 79 F. 575 ; United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 10 Cir., 270 F. 1 ; Ewert v. Thompson, 8 Cir., 281 F. 449 -451; Pennok et al. v. … United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Alpine Sherriff Department

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 22, 2019

    See Davis v. Molina, No. 1:14-cv-01554 LJO DLB PC, 2016 U.S. 20 Dist. LEXIS 53031, at *6 (E.D. Cal. … See Yeti by 5 Molly, Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clayton v. Kijakazi

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 3, 2024

    Lambert v. Saul, 6 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488- 7 89 (9th Cir. 2015)). The “‘clear and convincing’ standard requires an ALJ to show his 8 work.” Smartt v. … See Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). Harmless 9 error is therefore the exception to the rule in Social Security appeals. See id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Richardson v. San Diego Sheriff's Office

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 15, 2021

    See Board of Cty. 16 Comm’rs. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a 17 municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v. 18 Barnes, 749 F.3d 755, 762 (9th Cir. 2014).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Meza v. United States

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2022

    May v. … Based on the 12 court’s review, Detective Brown’s “miscarriage” statement fell far short of the tactics 13 used in United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Riverside Cement Co. v. Rogan

    59 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 28, 1945

    Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 259 (resolution of Board of Directors approved by all stockholders) ; Oviatt’s v. … See: Murchison’s Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir. 1935, 76 F.2d 641 ; Reed Drug Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gentle v. Sessions

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 20, 2019

    See 16 Castro-Cortez v. … Rojas- 20 Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 819 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation and quotation omitted); 21 Dhangu v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • J.K.J. v. City of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 26, 2019

    See, e.g., Bacon v. Mandell, No. 10–5506, 2012 WL 4105088, at *14 n. 21 (D.N.J. Sept. 14, 2012). … Id.; cf., e.g., Brown v. Alexander, No. 13–01451, 2015 WL 1744331, 26 at *7 (N.D.Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Emmons v. City of Escondido

    168 F. Supp. 3d 1265 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 2, 2016

    Brown, 392 Fed.Appx. 515 (9th Cir.2010), where two 911 emergency calls were placed concerning the same event, and not just one call. These authorities are not helpful to Plaintiff. … See Illinois, 497 U.S. 177 , 110 S.Ct. 2793 , Mincey v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Young

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 24, 2026

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting 23 Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th Cir. 1998)). … Meneses v. Berryhill, No. ED CV 16-1061-PLA, 2017 WL 598759, at *4 (C.D. 5 Cal. Feb. 14, 2017) (citing Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.