Case law

Thomas v. Papa Johns International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · May 8, 2024

v. … See Shulman v. Grp.

J.F. v. San Diego County Unified School

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 2, 2020

See, e.g., Bacon v. Mandell, 18 No. 10–5506, 2012 WL 4105088, at *14 n. 21 (D.N.J. Sept. 14, 2012). … Id.; cf., e.g., Brown v. Alexander, No. 13–01451, 2015 WL 1744331, at *7 (N.D.Cal.

Casey

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 3, 2026

Petitioner appealed to the Board of Immigration 9 Appeals (BIA). … Perry, 95 F.4th 750 (4th 2 | Cir. 2024) (same); Martinez v.

Hammerlord

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 24, 2026

Lance v. … Goodman v.

The People of the State of California v. Coast Runner Industries Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 4, 2024

See Brown v. Elec. … Hood v.

Davalos

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 25, 2026

Smolen v. … Brown-Hunter v. 10 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 11 (9th Cir. 1998)); see also Holohan v.

Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd.

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 7, 2022

Guz v. … As evidence of discriminatory motive, 10 Plaintiffs allege that in a 2018 Board meeting, Defendant’s Board “cited” the San Diego 11 Branch as being “seen as ‘post-mature.’” Id.

Zaback v. Kellogg Sales Company

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 22, 2020

The back packaging also lists the following ingredients: “[w]hole 13 grain oats, brown rice syrup, almonds, dried cane syrup, oat bran, brown rice, natural 14 flavors, ground flax seeds.”2 (Id.). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).

Burt

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 14, 2025

Comm’rs v. 25 Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 415 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 (emphasis in original).

Vazquez

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 10, 2026

See Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494. 10 VI.

Kalayci

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 17, 2026

Fuga v. Warden, 2026 WL 1396685, *3 (E.D.Cal. … Dada v.

Arellano v. Olson

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 31, 2022

No. 7 at 9 (citing Brown v. … See Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 19 942-43 (9th Cir. 2005) (“the applicable statute of limitations must be tolled while a 20 prisoner completes the mandatory exhaustion process”).

Penton v. Kernan

528 F. Supp. 2d 1020 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 20, 2007

Brown v. Mayle, 283 F.3d 1019 at 1040 (9th Cir.2002), vacated on other grounds, Mayle v. Brown, 538 U.S. 901 , 123 S.Ct. 1509 , 155 L.Ed.2d 220 (2003); United States v. Sorenson, 914 F.2d 173, 174 (9th Cir.1990). … Brown, 283 F.3d at 1040 (9th Cir. 2002), vacated on other grounds, Mayle v. Brown, 538 U.S. 901 , 123 S.Ct. 1509 , 155 L.Ed.2d 220 (2003). Petitioner's sentence was enhanced by the Three Strikes law.

Schatte v. INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE, ETC.

84 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, S.D. California · May 27, 1949

See Amalgamated Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261 , 60 S.Ct. 561 , 84 L.Ed. 738 ; Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers Union, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 183 ; United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers, etc. v. … United Packing House Workers, etc., v. Wilson & Co., D.C., 80 F.Supp. 563, 568 .

Pacific Scientific Co. v. Aerotec Industries of California

243 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 12, 1965

The Patent Office Board of Appeals reversed the examiner and allowed these claims. What is now patent 234 likewise was first rejected on the basis of prior art. … Stearns v. Tinker & Rasor, 220 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1955).

Sampedro v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 15, 2023

(Id. at 24–25 (quoting Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489. 10 b.

Jan

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2026

(Return, Ex. 5.) 4 After that bond decision, the immigration judge held a merits hearing on Petitioner’s 5 case following a remand order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).1 After … for the first 90 days post final 14 removal order, or until June 21, 2026.2 Thus, Respondents argue Petitioner’s claim is not 15 yet ripe, and will not be ripe until at least September 24, 2026, according to Zadvydas v.

Keavney v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · May 27, 2020

See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 12 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a 13 tortfeasor.”); Jackson v. … Acri v.

United States v. Franzenberg

739 F. Supp. 1414 · District Court, S.D. California · May 25, 1990

Under U.S. v. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 739 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1982).

Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Adecco S.A.

371 F. Supp. 2d 1203 · District Court, S.D. California · May 16, 2005

In this regard an independent Counsel has been appointed by the Audit & Finance Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to conduct an investigation. … Adams v.