Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
1.04s
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 15, 2022
Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING 12 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, v. … (d) the Plan and the 23 Plan’s past fiduciaries, Plan administrators, recordkeepers, service providers, 24 consultants, and parties-in-interest and (e) Defendants’ agents, officers, employees, 25 trustees, Board
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Apr 14, 2026
Kona 2 Enterprises, Inc. v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Nov 13, 2025
This is because a Board of Immigration Appeals’ opinion in 23 “Matter of Yajure Hurtado” “eliminat[ed] Immigration Judge jurisdiction to redetermine 24 custody for” “noncitizens who entered without inspection,” subjecting … .”); Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 7 □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025) (same); 8 ||see also Rodriguez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Apr 22, 2022
Erickson v. … , or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board....” 9 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMS Amlin Corporate Member, Ltd v. Bottini
District Court, S.D. California · Oct 8, 2020
Francis Bottini, Jr., Case No. 37-2019-00047099-CU-PN-CTL and Ronald G. 27 Brown Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Jeremy R Melton v. Francis Bottini, Jr., Case No. 37-2020- 00012491-CU-PN-CTL. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 2021
Reyes v. Brown, 12 No. 16CV84-JLS (BLM), 2017 WL 1355004, at *6 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2017), adopted by 13 2017 WL 2928777 (S.D. Cal. … Dittman v. California, 191 F.3d 24 1020, 1025–26 (9th Cir. 1999); see also Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 752 25 (9th Cir. 2009) (CDCR is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity).
Cited 0 timesUnknownGrayson Heat Control, Ltd. v. Los Angeles Gas Appliance Co.
40 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 10, 1941
The court there considers the prior Supreme Court cases of Seymour v. Osborne, 1871, 11 Wall. 516 , 78 U.S. 516 , 20 L.Ed. 33 , and Steward v. American Lava Co., 215 U.S. 161 , 30 S.Ct. 46 , 54 L.Ed. 139 . … Brown v. Piper, 1875, 91 U.S. 37 , 23 L.Ed. 200 ; Werk v. Parker, 1919, 249 U.S. 130 , 39 S.Ct. 197 , 63 L.Ed. 514 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2026
.: 26-cv-2741-RSH-DDL 12 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION 13 v. … /d. 9 Petitioner does not address the immigration judge’s stated reasons for denying bond, 10 || nor does he address whether he has appealed or will appeal his bond denial to the Board of 11 Immigration Appeals
Cited 0 timesUnknownMESA GRANDE BAND OF MISSION INDIANS v. Salazar
657 F. Supp. 2d 1169 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 25, 2009
Id. at 285 , 103 S.Ct. 1811 (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832, 833 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWalpert v. Solar Integrated Roofing Corp.
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2025
Greer v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSecurities and Exchange Commission v. de Nicolas Gutierrez
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2020
Brown v. China Integrated Energy, 4 Inc., 285 F.R.D. 560, 565 (C.D. Cal. 2012); Richmond Techs., Inc. v. Aumtech Bus. Sols., 5 No. 11-CV-02460-LHK, 2011 WL 2607158, at *13 (N.D. Cal. … Richmond, 2011 WL 2607158, at 9 *13; Brown, 285 F.R.D. at 566.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. General Petroleum Corporation
73 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 10, 1947
The power assigned to such official or board is administrative in character, not legislative. … In Gillioz v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedTitle Insurance and Trust Company v. United States
249 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 8, 1965
United States, 279 U.S. 151 , 49 S.Ct. 291 , 73 L.Ed. 647 ; Merchants National Bank of Boston v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 256 , 64 S.Ct. 108 , 88 L.Ed. 35 ; and Henslee v. … As authority for its position plaintiff cites Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bank of America, 9 Cir., 133 F.2d 753 , and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wells Fargo, 9 Cir., 145 F.2d 130 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedDawes v. The People of the State of California
District Court, S.D. California · May 20, 2024
Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978); Board of the 18 County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 402-04 (1997); Navarro v. Block, 72 F.3d 19 712, 714 (9th Cir. 1995). … Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCarlborg v. Department of Navy
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 17, 2025
The Recorder’s Log details the “Board of 18 Correction [cases] for two individuals, whose different cases were heard by the same board 19 on [May 19, 2022].” (Id.) … Based 8 on this precedent, courts have found that an agency is not required to produce screenshots. 9 See Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2026
Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). 14 That discretion is guided by seven factors. See Eitel v. … See 17 Board of Trs. of Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Tr. Fund v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 9, 2026
See Kourteva v. INS, 151 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 1128 (N.D. … See Doe v. Bondi, Case No. 3:25-cv-805-BJC-JLB, 2025 WL 1870979, at *1 (S.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCardosa v. Omni Hotels Management Corp.
177 F. Supp. 3d 1278 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 31, 2016
See Gould v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. New York, 790 F.2d 769, 774 (9th Cir.1986). As such, it cannot reach the merits of any dispute until it confirms its own subject matter jurisdiction. See Steel Co. v. … See Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 28, 2025
Council v. U.S. … (Id. at 2 (citing Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979); Douglas v. 13 Kalanta, No. 23-15104, 2024 WL 1795160, at *3 (9th Cir. Apr. 25, 2024), cert. denied, 14 145 S. Ct. 416 (2024)).)
Cited 0 timesUnknownSandoval v. San Diego, County of
District Court, S.D. California · Nov 9, 2023
Id.; see also McSherry v. … U.S. v. Vallejo, 237 F.3d 1008, 1019 7 (9th Cir. 2001). Relevancy requires “the evidence…logically advance a material aspect 8 of the party’s case.” Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 942 (9th Cir. 2007).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna