Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.78s

  • Salido v. Hill

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 27, 2025

    . § 1915A(a), (b)(1)-(2); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 446‒47 11 (9th Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). … Nordstrom v. Ryan, 762 F.3d 903, 907 n.1 (9th Cir. 2014) 14 (quoting Wheeler v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kinsey v. Saul

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 6, 2021

    See Leon v. … Brown-Hunter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Solar Integrated Roofing Corp. v. Massey

    District Court, S.D. California · May 3, 2024

    In 3 February of 2020, SIRC’s Board of Directors (“the Board”) issued Massey 5,000,000 4 shares of Class B SIRC stock worth $1,500,000.00 as compensation after Massey told the 5 Board he had not received any compensation … The Board 6 issued Massey another 1,5000,000 shares four months later, again for compensation. Id. 7 at 5.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Durkin v. Shields

    179 F.R.D. 286 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 18, 1998

    In Burroughs v. … In Kaiser Steel Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 3, 2020

    Cal. filed Oct. 2, 2019); Lader v. Sodexo Mgmt., Inc., No. 19-CV- 1908 TWR (BLM) (S.D. Cal. filed Oct. 2, 2019); Evers v. Sodexo Mgmt., Inc., No. 19-CV-1907 TWR 26 (BLM) (S.D. Cal. filed Oct. 2, 2019); Browning v. … Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal., 28 Inc., 7 Cal. 4th 926, 932 (1994) (quoting Teitelbaum v. Borders, 206 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility District

    193 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 5, 1961

    In McFarland v. … The case of Schwartz v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2020

    Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler 10 Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 11 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1995)). … on the Company's Board of Directors would 13 || have been futile shall be the composition of the Board of Directors as of February 7, 2020, 14 || the date this action was initiated. 15 5.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anokiwave, Inc. v. Rebeiz

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 20, 2019

    Hallett v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fisher

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 14, 2025

    See Preiser v. 21 Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 488-500 (1973). … Nettles v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Evans Hotel, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 28, 2022

    ; BRIGETTE BROWNING (“Browning”); 27 SAN DIEGO COUNTY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 28 AFL-CIO (“SDCBCTC”); and TOM LEMMON, an individual (“Lennon”) (collectively, 1 “Defendants”) along … Dutta v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dunsmore v. State of California

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 8, 2025

    Here, 24 RBGG only proposes a 5% across-the-board cut. (Doc. No. 807-1 at 26.) … Freese v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chung v. QBE Insurance Corporation

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 21, 2024

    Vazquez v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McNeely Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 27, 2025

    Brown- 10 Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493. 11 That is not to say that the ALJ’s decision was careless.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rebecca Bamberger Works, LLC v. Bamberger

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 30, 2024

    The board would include Bamberger and two LLYC 24 representatives. … Reno Air Racing Ass’n v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 24, 2026

    Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 20 325 (1989); Andrews v. … Norton v. S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. 5.324 Acres of Land

    79 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 12, 1948

    In Brown v. Bachelder, 214 Cal. 753, 755 , 7 P.2d 1027,1028 , it is stated, ‘That the presumption is highly favored in the law is made clear by the discussion of this court in Anderson v. … This reasoning finds expression in Brown v. Bachelder, 214 Cal. 753, 755, 756 , 7 P.2d 1027 .” (Italics supplied.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Alvarado

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 11, 2025

    Brown v. … Proc. 2 Code § 352.1 and Brown, the limitations period set by Cal. Civ. Proc.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Raya v. Barka

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 3, 2023

    See Wise v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Goodlow

    District Court, S.D. California · May 29, 2026

    . § 1915A(a), (b)(1)–(2); Resnick v. Hayes, 10 213 F.3d 443, 446–47 (9th Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 11 2011). … Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 21 1225 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting Bennett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Title Insurance and Trust Company v. United States

    249 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 8, 1965

    United States, 279 U.S. 151 , 49 S.Ct. 291 , 73 L.Ed. 647 ; Merchants National Bank of Boston v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 256 , 64 S.Ct. 108 , 88 L.Ed. 35 ; and Henslee v. … As authority for its position plaintiff cites Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bank of America, 9 Cir., 133 F.2d 753 , and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wells Fargo, 9 Cir., 145 F.2d 130 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.