Case law

Bhatia v. Silvergate Bank

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 1, 2023

of 20 || directors, the date of every meeting, and board minutes. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). A 12 bank is a citizen of the state in which its main office is located. Rouse v. Wachovia Mortg., FSB, 13 747 F.3d 707, 715 (9th Cir. 2014); see 28 U.S.C.A. § 1348.

United States v. Guess

425 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 23, 2006

Pierce v. … Love v.

Estrada

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 23, 2026

Brown, 171 Cal. … are analyzed under the 2 reasonableness standard of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” 3 Brown, 171 Cal. App. 4th at 527 (quoting Munoz v. City of Union City, 120 Cal.

Occidental Life Ins. v. Rogan

48 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 11, 1942

Founders General Corp. v. Hoey, supra. The Eighth Circuit in Becker v. … This has been a recognized rule since the days of Chief Justice Marshall, when in the case of Brown v.

Forbush v. NTI-CA Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 2025

Brown v. 5 USA Taekwondo, 11 Cal. 5th 204, 213 (2021); Gilead Tenofovir Cases, 98 Cal. App. 5th 6 911, 920 (2024). “Whether a duty exists is a question of law to be resolved by the court.” 7 Brown v. … See Brown v.

Larose

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2026

Petitioner 19 received a bond hearing on April 20, 2026; the immigration judge (“IJ”) denied bond due 20 to a risk of flight and Petitioner reserved appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals 21 (“BIA”). [Doc. … Leonardo v. 28 Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1160 (9th Cir. 2011). 1 The Court therefore DENIES Petitioner’s motion for an updated custody 2 || determination. 3 Itis SO

Opici v. Cucamonga Winery

73 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 1947

In Doctor v. … In City of Indianapolis v.

Barnes-Wallace v. Boy Scouts of America

275 F. Supp. 2d 1259 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 2003

Mitchell, 530 U.S. at 843 , 120 S.Ct. 2530 ; Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753, 780 , 115 S.Ct. 2440 , 132 L.Ed.2d 650 (1995); Witters v. … See Alvarado v.

Villasenor v. McNett

District Court, S.D. California · May 10, 2021

See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 15 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely 16 because it employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v. … Hudson v.

Flaherty v. McDonald

183 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 1960

industry affecting commerce within the meaning of § 3(c) of the 1959 Labor Act, and that Local 2869 is certified as bargaining representative of the employees of Kaiser Steel Corporation by the National Labor Relations Board … III; see Lockerty v.

Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Ass'n v. United States

81 F. Supp. 991 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 24, 1949

Plaintiffs, a nonprofit California corporation, and individuals comprising its board of directors, seek by this action “to enjoin, set aside, suspend and annul a certain report, requirement and order of the Interstate Commerce … Co. v. United States, 257 U.S. 114, 116 , 42 S.Ct. 25 , 66 L.Ed. 156 ; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific R. Co., 1912, 222 U.S. 541, 547, 548 , 32 S.Ct. 108 , 56 L.Ed. 308 .

Diaz v. California Department of Corrections

217 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, S.D. California · May 14, 1963

(Thompson v. Overlade, 7 C.A., 1954, 216 F.2d 492, 493 .) … (Whittaker v. Overholser, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 66 , 299 F.2d 447, 448 .)

Friesland Fishing Company LLC v. Maughan

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2023

WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 14 11) BEN BROWN MAUGHAN III, … P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 25 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Westover

70 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 11, 1947

As said by Judge Mathews in Pacific National Bank of Seattle v. … In McDermott v.

SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.

830 F. Supp. 2d 986 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 21, 2011

Naughton left ATS shortly after it filed for bankruptcy, and is now the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors for Histogen. … By September 2002, Naughton presented a confidential report on Nouri-Cel’s hair growth potential to ATS’s Scientific Advisory Board (“the SAB Report”).

Jones v. Montgomery

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 14, 2023

Petitioner challenges the denial by 5 13 || the Board of Parole Hearings of his request to advance his next parole hearing. … See 3 17 Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitioner was S 18 || convicted in Alameda County which is in this district.

Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. California

343 F. Supp. 3d 952 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 28, 2018

Brown, Jr. (collectively, "State") to expand its gaming rights. However, Pauma now claims the State has failed to negotiate with the Tribe in good faith. … In Seminole Tribe of Florida v.

Silverman v. United States Department of Defense

817 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 2, 1993

National Transportation Safety Board, 888 F.2d 854, 856 (D.C.Cir.1989). The court’s role is “to review the whole administrative record to determine whether there was a rational basis for the agency’s action.” Caiola v. … Robinson v. Cheney, 876 F.2d 152, 160 (D.C.Cir.1989).

United States v. Chaplin

54 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 14, 1944

In Snowden v. Edward J. Hughes et al., 64 S.Ct. 397 , this was an action against members of the State Primary Canvassing Board. … Decker v. Board of Health Commissioners, 6 Cal.App.2d 334 , 44 P.2d 636 ; Scully v. State, 20 Cal.2d 178 , 124 P.2d 609 ; People v. Thompson, 55 Cal. App.2d 147 , 130 P.2d 237 .

San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Monsanto Co.

309 F. Supp. 3d 854 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 30, 2018

In Clinton v. … San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board The Port District does not identify which of these alleged redundant defenses it requests the Court to strike.