Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.48s

  • Glenn v. United States

    129 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 1955

    See: Ozawa v. United States, 1922, 260 U.S. 178, 194 , 43 S.Ct. 65, 67 , 67 L.Ed. 199 ; Chatwin v. … United States v. American Trucking Ass'ns, supra, 310 U.S. at page 543 , 60 S.Ct. 1059 ; Pollard v. Bailey, 1874, 20 Wall. 520, 525-526 , 87 U.S. 520, 525-526 , 22 L.Ed. 376 ; Brown v.

    Reversed by United States v. Michael Glenn, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Ida Mae Glenn, 231 F.2d 884 (1956)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gan Seow Tung v. Clark

    83 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 18, 1949

    Quon Quon Poy v. Johnson, 1926, 273 U.S. 352, 358 , 47 S.Ct. 346 , 71 L.Ed. 680 ; Kessler v. … Siu Say v. Nagle, 9 Cir., 1924, 295 F. 676 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Residential Energy Services Network, Inc. v. Building Science Institute, Ltd. Co., et al.

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 21, 2025

    Corp. v. … But that principle was already 14 clear from the statute, which states that the Board “‘may accept’ such proof ‘as prima facie 15 evidence that the mark has become distinctive.’” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Plies

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 31, 2026

    Vasquez v. … See Brown-Hunter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Southern California Rental Housing Association v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 2022

    DISMISS AS MOOT AND 15 Plaintiff GRANTING LEAVE TO RE-FILE 16 [ECF NO. 16] COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, BOARD … Rental Housing v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lopez

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 19, 2026

    See Ivey v. … City 17 of Oakland v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Koehler v. Pulvers

    614 F. Supp. 829 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 1985

    Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 109 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901 (1976); cf Stephenson v. … Code § 1710 (2), (3); Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, supra, 57 Cal.App.3d at 110 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901 ). Mr.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Matter of Extradition of Valdez-Mainero

    3 F. Supp. 2d 1112 · District Court, S.D. California · May 8, 1998

    Browne, 205 U.S. 309, 316 , 27 S.Ct. 539 , 51 L.Ed. 816 (1907), and McCann v. U.S. Board of Parole, 488 F.2d 39, 40 (3d Cir.1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 958 , 94 S.Ct. 1974 , 40 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974)). 2. … In Emami v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC

    267 F.R.D. 625 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 26, 2010

    v. … Cicairos, 35 Cal.Rptr.3d at 252-53 ; Brown, 249 F.R.D. at 585 . However, the employee is not required to use the provided meal period.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Conde v. Sensa

    259 F. Supp. 3d 1064 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 26, 2017

    See Tran v. … See, e.g., Doe v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Harper v. George Bailey Detention Facility

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 15, 2021

    See 6 Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 7 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a tortfeasor.”); 8 Jackson v. … Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dolgoff v. Kaynar Co.

    18 F.R.D. 424 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 20, 1955

    See Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co. v. O. S. Walker Co., 1 Cir., 1948, 167 F.2d 687, 693 . The question remains whether the validity of the patent in suit need be adjudicated upon this motion .for summary judgment. … Co. v. H.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Klat

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 2, 2026

    Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, opposes the first motion to dismiss, 20 filed by the County of San Diego (the “County”) and the County of San Diego Board of 21 Supervisors (the “Board”), see ECF No. 7, as well as the second … Based on this allegation of “legal standing,” Plaintiff alleges that 24 Governor Newsom, the County, the Board, and Ms.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Allman v. Philip Morris, Inc.

    865 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 22, 1994

    Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). … For example, in Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp, 937 F.2d 899, 918 (3rd Cir.1991), cited favorably by the Ninth Circuit in Oscar v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Bhatia v. Silvergate Bank

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 1, 2023

    of 20 || directors, the date of every meeting, and board minutes. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). A 12 bank is a citizen of the state in which its main office is located. Rouse v. Wachovia Mortg., FSB, 13 747 F.3d 707, 715 (9th Cir. 2014); see 28 U.S.C.A. § 1348.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.

    137 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 10, 1956

    Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 1918, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 . 36 . Federal Communications Commission v. … Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, supra Note 35. 39 . Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, supra Note 35. 40 . Joseph Burstyn, Inc., v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Bilbray

    782 F. Supp. 1420 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 3, 1991

    West Virginia Board of Education v. … Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo, a case involving the incorporation of the Latin cross on a city seal.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 2021

    Whittlestone, Inc. v. … cancel the board meeting. 12 Docket no. 23-15 is an email from Carter to board members announcing his 13 intent to hold the board meeting as originally scheduled.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Guess

    425 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 23, 2006

    Pierce v. … Love v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 29, 2025

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). “[T]he 22 burden of showing that an error is harmful normally falls upon the party attacking 23 the agency’s determination.” Molina v. … Gomez-Perez v. Berryhill, No. SACV 16-1174 JC, 14 2017 WL 810275, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2017) (quoting Brown-Hunter, 15 806 F.3d at 492).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.